Investigating Factors Contributing to Poor Performance in Teaching and Learning of N3 Assembly Drawing: A Case of uMgungundlovu TVET College

Philani Brian Mlambo, Mthokozisi Sakhile Mkhwanazi
{"title":"Investigating Factors Contributing to Poor Performance in Teaching and Learning of N3 Assembly Drawing: A Case of uMgungundlovu TVET College","authors":"Philani Brian Mlambo, Mthokozisi Sakhile Mkhwanazi","doi":"10.36312/esaintika.v8i1.1479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poor performance in Assembly Drawing (AD) has been a significant issue in Engineering Graphics and Design (EGD) in high schools and TVET colleges. This poor performance in AD, which is a crucial component of the EGD exam, leads to students not performing well in Grade 12 and consequently limits their entry into engineering programs in TVET colleges. Consequently, this study aims to investigate the contributing factors to poor performance in the teaching and learning of AD among N3 students. To achieve the objectives of this study, a mixed research approach was employed, and data was collected through semi-structured interviews and the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test (PSVT). A purposive sampling method was used to select four Engineering Drawing (ED) lecturers and 45 N3 Engineering Drawing students to participate in this study. Furthermore, Piaget's perception and imagery theory and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) were utilized as frameworks underpinning this study. The interview results were analyzed using thematic analysis, while the data from the PSVT was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The findings of this study indicate that N3 students have very low spatial visualization skills, and the negative attitude displayed by both students and lecturers towards the teaching and learning of AD contributes to poor performance in N3 ED. The findings further revealed that the lack of drawing-related teaching qualifications among lecturers also contributes to poor performance in AD. Furthermore, the quantitative findings show that the students achieved a mean score of 16.82, with a standard deviation of 8.389, indicating poor performance on the PSVT test. One limitation of this study is the small number of lecturers interviewed (four), which makes it difficult to generalize the results. Therefore, future studies should include a larger sample size of lecturers. This study recommends that lecturers be hired based on their relevant teaching qualifications and further suggests the use of technology to enhance students' spatial visualization skills and improve their performance in AD.","PeriodicalId":165148,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika","volume":"96 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v8i1.1479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor performance in Assembly Drawing (AD) has been a significant issue in Engineering Graphics and Design (EGD) in high schools and TVET colleges. This poor performance in AD, which is a crucial component of the EGD exam, leads to students not performing well in Grade 12 and consequently limits their entry into engineering programs in TVET colleges. Consequently, this study aims to investigate the contributing factors to poor performance in the teaching and learning of AD among N3 students. To achieve the objectives of this study, a mixed research approach was employed, and data was collected through semi-structured interviews and the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test (PSVT). A purposive sampling method was used to select four Engineering Drawing (ED) lecturers and 45 N3 Engineering Drawing students to participate in this study. Furthermore, Piaget's perception and imagery theory and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) were utilized as frameworks underpinning this study. The interview results were analyzed using thematic analysis, while the data from the PSVT was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The findings of this study indicate that N3 students have very low spatial visualization skills, and the negative attitude displayed by both students and lecturers towards the teaching and learning of AD contributes to poor performance in N3 ED. The findings further revealed that the lack of drawing-related teaching qualifications among lecturers also contributes to poor performance in AD. Furthermore, the quantitative findings show that the students achieved a mean score of 16.82, with a standard deviation of 8.389, indicating poor performance on the PSVT test. One limitation of this study is the small number of lecturers interviewed (four), which makes it difficult to generalize the results. Therefore, future studies should include a larger sample size of lecturers. This study recommends that lecturers be hired based on their relevant teaching qualifications and further suggests the use of technology to enhance students' spatial visualization skills and improve their performance in AD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查导致 N3 装配图教学效果不佳的因素:UMgungundlovu 职业技术教育与培训学院的案例
装配图(AD)成绩差一直是高中和职业技术教育与培训学院工程制图与设计(EGD)的一个重要问题。装配图(AD)是工程图学与设计(EGD)考试的重要组成部分,其成绩不佳导致学生在 12 年级的成绩不理想,从而限制了他们进入职业技术教育与培训学院的工程专业学习。因此,本研究旨在调查导致初三学生在副学士考试中成绩不佳的因素。为了实现本研究的目标,本研究采用了混合研究法,通过半结构式访谈和普渡空间可视化测试(PSVT)收集数据。本研究采用目的性抽样法,选取了四名工程制图(ED)讲师和 45 名 N3 工程制图学生参与研究。此外,皮亚杰的感知与意象理论和教学内容知识(PCK)被用作本研究的基础框架。访谈结果采用主题分析法进行分析,而 PSVT 数据则采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行分析。研究结果表明,初三学生的空间可视化能力非常低,而学生和讲师对AD的教与学所表现出的消极态度也是导致初三教育学成绩不佳的原因之一。研究结果还显示,讲师缺乏与绘画相关的教学资质也是导致学生在 AD 方面表现不佳的原因之一。此外,定量研究结果显示,学生在 PSVT 测试中的平均得分为 16.82 分,标准差为 8.389 分,这表明学生在 PSVT 测试中表现不佳。本研究的局限性之一是受访讲师人数较少(4 人),因此很难将结果一概而论。因此,今后的研究应包括更多的讲师样本。本研究建议根据讲师的相关教学资质聘用讲师,并进一步建议使用技术提高学生的空间可视化技能,改善他们在AD中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Future Classroom: Analyzing the Integration and Impact of Digital Technologies in Science Education Characteristics of Project-Based Learning Models on the Project to Strengthening the Pancasila Student Profiles at Muhammadiyah School The Influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Mobile Learning on Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Did the Mediation of Self-Competence Matter? Bioindicators for Forest Area Condition: A Systematic Literature Review Learning Outcomes of the Inquiry-in-Action Model for Chemistry Experimentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1