Modelling Customised Student Support Framework to Enhance University at-risk Students’ Study Skills

T. V. Ndobe, S. Seeletse, T. Hungwe
{"title":"Modelling Customised Student Support Framework to Enhance University at-risk Students’ Study Skills","authors":"T. V. Ndobe, S. Seeletse, T. Hungwe","doi":"10.26803/ijlter.23.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poor pass rates are a severe concern for the Department of Higher Education and Training and the universities in South Africa. Throughput rates remain low and programme completion takes much longer. On the other hand, universities suffer high dropouts due to general students' poor academic performance. One feasible intervention is student support. Universities should implement efficient and monitored student support systems (SSS). The paper discussed ways in which students may be supported with their study skills. It explored the attributes that are useful to improving students’ pass rates and the general students’ academic performance at a selected South African University (SSAU). These attributes can be integrated through planning implementation, monitoring, evaluation and control (PIMEC) processes. Action research benchmarking exercise adopting the theoretical frameworks of constructivism and symbolic interactionalism was conducted. Some successful approaches and benchmarks from international and developed countries’ universities were used to formalise and model student support in a modern tertiary institution setting. The boosted PIMEC concept and the improved student support response systems (SSRS) were blended in developing the PIMEC framework that this paper proposed for the SSAU. Besides, the concepts and approaches (such as crowdsourcing and incubation) used in business success were used to fortify the model. This resulted in a PIMEC-Enhanced SSRS Blended Model for improving the current SSS, emphasising communication within the system from top management, ICT and academic operation levels. Thus, it recommended the identification of at-risk students early during formative assessments.","PeriodicalId":37101,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","volume":"121 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor pass rates are a severe concern for the Department of Higher Education and Training and the universities in South Africa. Throughput rates remain low and programme completion takes much longer. On the other hand, universities suffer high dropouts due to general students' poor academic performance. One feasible intervention is student support. Universities should implement efficient and monitored student support systems (SSS). The paper discussed ways in which students may be supported with their study skills. It explored the attributes that are useful to improving students’ pass rates and the general students’ academic performance at a selected South African University (SSAU). These attributes can be integrated through planning implementation, monitoring, evaluation and control (PIMEC) processes. Action research benchmarking exercise adopting the theoretical frameworks of constructivism and symbolic interactionalism was conducted. Some successful approaches and benchmarks from international and developed countries’ universities were used to formalise and model student support in a modern tertiary institution setting. The boosted PIMEC concept and the improved student support response systems (SSRS) were blended in developing the PIMEC framework that this paper proposed for the SSAU. Besides, the concepts and approaches (such as crowdsourcing and incubation) used in business success were used to fortify the model. This resulted in a PIMEC-Enhanced SSRS Blended Model for improving the current SSS, emphasising communication within the system from top management, ICT and academic operation levels. Thus, it recommended the identification of at-risk students early during formative assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立定制化学生支持框架,提高大学问题学生的学习技能
通过率低是南非高等教育与培训部和各大学严重关切的问题。通过率仍然很低,完成课程需要更长的时间。另一方面,由于普通学生学习成绩差,大学的辍学率也很高。一个可行的干预措施是学生支持。大学应实施高效且受监督的学生支持系统(SSS)。本文讨论了支持学生学习技能的方法。论文探讨了在一所选定的南非大学(SSAU)中有助于提高学生及格率和学生总体学业成绩的属性。这些特质可以通过规划实施、监测、评估和控制(PIMEC)过程加以整合。采用建构主义和符号互动主义理论框架,开展了行动研究基准设定工作。国际和发达国家大学的一些成功方法和基准被用于在现代高等院校环境中对学生支持进行正规化和示范。本文提出的 PIMEC 框架融合了 PIMEC 概念和改进的学生支持响应系统(SSRS)。此外,商业成功中使用的概念和方法(如众包和孵化)也被用于强化该模型。这就产生了一个 PIMEC--增强型 SSRS 混合模型,用于改进当前的 SSS,强调从高层管理、信息和通信技术以及学术运作层面在系统内进行沟通。因此,它建议在形成性评估期间及早发现问题学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
期刊最新文献
The Potential of Linguistic Landscapes for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Cuenca, Ecuador Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Learner Autonomy: A Case Study in Vietnam Reflection Analysis of Resilient and Sustainable Research and Publication Activities at the National University of Science & Technology, Oman during COVID-19 The Effectiveness of Team Teaching in Improving Reading Skill among Thai EFL Undergraduates and Their Attitudes toward this Strategy Testing the Healthy School Organisation Instrument (i-OS) and the Holistic Psychological Well-Being Model of School Organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1