Klausul Arbitrase dan Kewenangan Absolut Lembaga Arbitrase dalam Praktek Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan

Femmy Syamana, Zil Aidi
{"title":"Klausul Arbitrase dan Kewenangan Absolut Lembaga Arbitrase dalam Praktek Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan","authors":"Femmy Syamana, Zil Aidi","doi":"10.47467/reslaj.v6i3.5101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Indonesia, the settlement of disputes through arbitration is regulated by Law no. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Problem Resolutions. Article 7 Law no. 30 of 1999 stipulates that the parties can agree to an agreement on a dispute that has occurred or will occur between them to be resolved through arbitration with a written agreement agreed upon by the parties. In the selection of arbitral settlement there is a link between the arbitration clause and the selection of settlement through arbitration as well as the implementation of absolute authority and the selection of arbitral institutions in the practice of dispute resolution outside the court. The approach method used is normative juridical. The results of the study state that the choice of arbitration as a dispute resolution is based on a contract in accordance with what is implied in Article 7 and Article 9 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 1999, and in this case the parties to the agreement agree to include an arbitration clause, The court is bound by the agreement made by the parties, with the provisions of the article, the absolute competence of arbitration is born when the parties expressly choose to resolve disputes through an arbitration forum where this has been accommodated in Article 3, Article 4, Article 10 and Article 11 paragraphs (1) and (2) in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, which negates the authority of court institutions to examine cases that are already bound by an arbitration clause.","PeriodicalId":508337,"journal":{"name":"Reslaj : Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reslaj : Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v6i3.5101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Indonesia, the settlement of disputes through arbitration is regulated by Law no. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Problem Resolutions. Article 7 Law no. 30 of 1999 stipulates that the parties can agree to an agreement on a dispute that has occurred or will occur between them to be resolved through arbitration with a written agreement agreed upon by the parties. In the selection of arbitral settlement there is a link between the arbitration clause and the selection of settlement through arbitration as well as the implementation of absolute authority and the selection of arbitral institutions in the practice of dispute resolution outside the court. The approach method used is normative juridical. The results of the study state that the choice of arbitration as a dispute resolution is based on a contract in accordance with what is implied in Article 7 and Article 9 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 1999, and in this case the parties to the agreement agree to include an arbitration clause, The court is bound by the agreement made by the parties, with the provisions of the article, the absolute competence of arbitration is born when the parties expressly choose to resolve disputes through an arbitration forum where this has been accommodated in Article 3, Article 4, Article 10 and Article 11 paragraphs (1) and (2) in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, which negates the authority of court institutions to examine cases that are already bound by an arbitration clause.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
仲裁条款和仲裁机构在法院外解决争议实践中的绝对权力
在印度尼西亚,通过仲裁解决争议受 1999 年关于仲裁和替代性问题解决方案的第 30 号法律管辖。1999 年第 30 号法律第 7 条规定,当事人可就他们之间已经发生或将要发生的争议达成协议,通过仲裁解决争议,并由当事人达成书面协议。在选择仲裁解决方式时,仲裁条款与选择仲裁解决方式之间存在着联系,同时在法院之外解决争议的实践中,执行绝对权威和选择仲裁机构也存在着联系。所使用的方法是规范法学方法。研究结果表明,根据 1999 年第 30 号法律第 7 条和第 9 条第(1)款的规定,选择仲裁作为争议解决方式是以合同为基础的、当当事人明确选择通过仲裁机构解决争议时,仲裁的绝对权限便产生了,1999 年第 30 号法律《仲裁和非诉讼争议解决法》第 3 条、第 4 条、第 10 条和第 11 条第 1 款和第 2 款对此作了规定,否定了法院机构审查已受仲裁条款约束的案件的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Directors on Financial Performance with Independent Commissioners as a Moderating Variable Collaborative Governance Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata “Waduk Bendo” di Desa Bendo, Kecamatan Kapas, Kabupaten Bojonegoro The Influence of Mental Health on Employee Performance with Physical Activity as a Moderating Variable Short Video Marketing: Strategies For Increasing Tourism In Indonesia The Influence Of Service Quality and Lifestyle On Purchase Decisions Using Shopee Paylater In Bandar Lampung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1