Analgesic Effect of Quadratus Lumborum Block Type III and Type II Versus Lateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

Q2 Medicine Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.5812/aapm-140464
Hesham Elsayed Elashry, Mohamed Abdelbadie, Abeer Ali Elshabacy, Omnia Ali Elmiseery
{"title":"Analgesic Effect of Quadratus Lumborum Block Type III and Type II Versus Lateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial","authors":"Hesham Elsayed Elashry, Mohamed Abdelbadie, Abeer Ali Elshabacy, Omnia Ali Elmiseery","doi":"10.5812/aapm-140464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Appropriate pain management promotes immediate mobilization and allows the parturient to adequately care for her neonate after cesarean section (CS). Objectives: This trial objective was to compare the type III and type II quadratus lumborum block (QLB) to transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) regarding postoperative analgesic effect in CS. Methods: This randomized, controlled, single-blind trial involved 60 women presenting for CS under spinal anesthesia. The patients were assigned randomly to either the QLB type III, QLB type II, or lateral TAPB group. All blocks were performed using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% bilaterally at the end of the operation with ultrasound guidance. Pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) score at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours. The level of patient satisfaction was graded on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Numerical rating scale measurements at 6, 8, and 12 hours and total consumed meperidine in the 1st 24 hours after the operation were reduced significantly in QLB III than in QLB II and TAPB groups (P < 0.05) with an insignificant difference between the QLB II and TAPB groups (P > 0.05). The onset of the first request for analgesia was delayed significantly in QLB III, compared to QLB II and TAPB groups (P < 0.05), without a significant difference between the QLB II and TAPB groups (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction and adverse events (e.g., postoperative nausea and vomiting, bradycardia, and hypotension) exhibited insignificant differences among the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The QLB type III ensured better analgesia as evidenced by significantly lower pain measurements and amount of meperidine in the first 24 hours after the operation with delayed time of the first rescue analgesia in comparison to QLB II and TAPB; however, QLB II and TAPB were similar.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"105 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-140464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Appropriate pain management promotes immediate mobilization and allows the parturient to adequately care for her neonate after cesarean section (CS). Objectives: This trial objective was to compare the type III and type II quadratus lumborum block (QLB) to transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) regarding postoperative analgesic effect in CS. Methods: This randomized, controlled, single-blind trial involved 60 women presenting for CS under spinal anesthesia. The patients were assigned randomly to either the QLB type III, QLB type II, or lateral TAPB group. All blocks were performed using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% bilaterally at the end of the operation with ultrasound guidance. Pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) score at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours. The level of patient satisfaction was graded on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Numerical rating scale measurements at 6, 8, and 12 hours and total consumed meperidine in the 1st 24 hours after the operation were reduced significantly in QLB III than in QLB II and TAPB groups (P < 0.05) with an insignificant difference between the QLB II and TAPB groups (P > 0.05). The onset of the first request for analgesia was delayed significantly in QLB III, compared to QLB II and TAPB groups (P < 0.05), without a significant difference between the QLB II and TAPB groups (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction and adverse events (e.g., postoperative nausea and vomiting, bradycardia, and hypotension) exhibited insignificant differences among the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The QLB type III ensured better analgesia as evidenced by significantly lower pain measurements and amount of meperidine in the first 24 hours after the operation with delayed time of the first rescue analgesia in comparison to QLB II and TAPB; however, QLB II and TAPB were similar.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖腹产中腰四肌阻滞 III 型和 II 型与腹横肌外侧平面阻滞的镇痛效果:随机对照多中心试验
背景:适当的疼痛管理可促进产妇立即恢复活动能力,并使其在剖宫产术(CS)后能够充分照顾新生儿。试验目的本试验旨在比较 III 型和 II 型腰方肌阻滞(QLB)与腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)对 CS 术后镇痛效果的影响。方法:这项随机对照单盲试验涉及 60 名在脊髓麻醉下接受 CS 的女性患者。患者被随机分配到 QLB III 型、QLB II 型或侧位 TAPB 组。所有阻滞都是在手术结束后,在超声引导下使用 20 mL 0.25% 布比卡因进行的。在麻醉后护理病房(PACU),分别于 2、4、6、8、12、18 和 24 小时使用数字评分量表(NRS)对疼痛进行评估。患者满意度采用李克特五点量表评分。结果:QLB III 组在术后 6、8 和 12 小时的数字评分量表测量值和术后 24 小时的甲哌啶总消耗量显著低于 QLB II 组和 TAPB 组(P < 0.05),QLB II 组和 TAPB 组之间的差异不显著(P > 0.05)。与 QLB II 组和 TAPB 组相比,QLB III 组首次要求镇痛的时间明显推迟(P < 0.05),QLB II 组和 TAPB 组之间的差异不显著(P > 0.05)。患者满意度和不良事件(如术后恶心和呕吐、心动过缓和低血压)在三组之间的差异不明显(P > 0.05)。结论:与 QLB II 型和 TAPB 型相比,QLB II 型和 TAPB 型在术后 24 小时内的疼痛测量值和甲哌丁用量明显降低,首次镇痛抢救时间也有所延迟,这证明 QLB III 型能确保更好的镇痛效果;不过,QLB II 型和 TAPB 型的镇痛效果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
The Power of Color Flow Doppler Ultrasonography Versus Blind Technique in Localization of Epidural Catheter: A Randomized Prospective Study. Spinal Anesthesia Management in a 30-Year-Old Patient with Progeria Syndrome: A Case Report. Robotic Pediatric Urologic Surgery-Clinical Anesthetic Considerations: A Comprehensive Review. Anesthetic Management Recommendations Using a Machine Learning Algorithm to Reduce the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgeries Retraction Note: The Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Esmolol on Early Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Middle Ear Surgery Under Hypotensive Technique: A Comparative, Randomized, Double-blind Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1