Mechanisms for Ensuring Transparency and Accountability of Police Operations: A Comparative Study

{"title":"Mechanisms for Ensuring Transparency and Accountability of Police Operations: A Comparative Study","authors":"","doi":"10.62271/pjc.16.1.649.664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to conduct a comparative analysis of approaches to the definition and implementation of mechanisms for ensuring transparency and accountability in police operations and to identify best practices. The research used the comparative analysis method, the formal-legal method, and the content analysis method. It was established that principal mechanisms of ensuring transparency in police operations involve providing open access to information through digital channels available to the public; ensuring public participation and control over police activities; implementing interaction with mass media. The principal approach to ensuring the accountability of police operations is the evaluation of police activity. The work proved that enhancing transparency and accountability can be achieved through various mechanisms, including implementing a top-notch electronic platform for citizens, as demonstrated by the UK police website. Adopting the concept of community policing is another effective strategy to promote these principles, as well as utilising social networks for interaction with citizens and carrying out qualitative and quantitative evaluations of police work, such as police effectiveness, efficiency, and legitimacy assessments. The findings of this study have the potential to provide valuable insights for law enforcement agencies in Ukraine and other countries by facilitating the integration of successful practices into their policing operations etc.","PeriodicalId":516769,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Criminology","volume":"59 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.1.649.664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article aims to conduct a comparative analysis of approaches to the definition and implementation of mechanisms for ensuring transparency and accountability in police operations and to identify best practices. The research used the comparative analysis method, the formal-legal method, and the content analysis method. It was established that principal mechanisms of ensuring transparency in police operations involve providing open access to information through digital channels available to the public; ensuring public participation and control over police activities; implementing interaction with mass media. The principal approach to ensuring the accountability of police operations is the evaluation of police activity. The work proved that enhancing transparency and accountability can be achieved through various mechanisms, including implementing a top-notch electronic platform for citizens, as demonstrated by the UK police website. Adopting the concept of community policing is another effective strategy to promote these principles, as well as utilising social networks for interaction with citizens and carrying out qualitative and quantitative evaluations of police work, such as police effectiveness, efficiency, and legitimacy assessments. The findings of this study have the potential to provide valuable insights for law enforcement agencies in Ukraine and other countries by facilitating the integration of successful practices into their policing operations etc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确保警察行动透明和问责的机制:比较研究
本文旨在对确保警察行动透明度和问责制的机制的定义和实施方法进行比较分析,并确定最佳做法。研究采用了比较分析法、形式-法律法和内容分析法。研究确定,确保警察行动透明度的主要机制包括通过公众可利用的数字渠道提供公开的信息获取途径;确保公众参与和控制警察活动;实施与大众媒体的互动。确保警察行动问责制的主要方法是对警察活动进行评估。这项工作证明,可以通过各种机制来提高透明度和加强问责制,其中包括为公民建立一个一流的电子平台,英国警察网站就证明了这一点。采用社区警务的概念是促进这些原则的另一项有效战略,还可利用社交网络与公民互动,并对警务工作进行定性和定量评估,如警务效力、效率和合法性评估。这项研究的结果有可能为乌克兰和其他国家的执法机构提供有价值的见解,促进将成功做法纳入其警务工作等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of a Restitution Model Based on Justice and Legal Certainty for Crime Victims in Indonesia The Problem of Jurisdictional Conflict and the Applicable Law on Cybercrime Assessing Human Impact on Coral Reef Ecosystems in Berau Regency, Indonesia: Implications for Conservation and Sustainable Tourism Development Legal Mechanism to Ensure the Sovereignty of a State’s Membership in the EU and NATO Development of the Organisational and Legal Mechanism of State Control of Local Self- Government in Ensuring the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1