Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy in the remission of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Polish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0054.2674
Joanna Aguirre Talledo, J. Caballero-Alvarado, Maria De la Cruz Davila, Carlos Zavaleta-Corvera
{"title":"Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy in the remission of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis","authors":"Joanna Aguirre Talledo, J. Caballero-Alvarado, Maria De la Cruz Davila, Carlos Zavaleta-Corvera","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0054.2674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine whether Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more effective than vertical sleeve gastrectomy in the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, the literature search was performed in 4 Web of Science, Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Medline/Ovid databases, 1323 results were identified, followed by screening and 14 articles selected and included in the systematic review were obtained. Primary and secondary outcomes were measured through an RR with a 95% CI.Results: The primary outcome of T2DM remission was 15% in favor of VSG, RR: 1.15; [95% CI: 1.04 – 1.28]. For secondary outcomes, hypertension remission was 7% in favor of RR VSG: 1.07; [95% CI: 1.00 – 1.16]. Remission of dyslipidemia was 16% in favor of RR VSG: 1.16; [ 95% CI: 1.06 – 1.26]. BMI after surgery was in favor of RYGB MD: -1.31; [95% CI: -1.98 – -0.64]. For excess weight loss was in favor of VSG with a MD: 6.50; [95% CI: 4.99 – 8.01]. In relation to total cholesterol, they were favorable for RYGB in 65% MD: -0.35; [95% CI: -0.46 – -0.24], with a value of p<0.05. For LDL values our results were favorable for RYGB at 69% MD: -0.31; [95% CI: -0.45 – -0.16], p<0.01 value.Conclusion: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is more effective in DM2 remission, hypertension remission, dyslipidemia remission, weight loss compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more effective in lowering BMI, lowering total cholesterol, LDL and TG compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.2674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more effective than vertical sleeve gastrectomy in the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, the literature search was performed in 4 Web of Science, Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Medline/Ovid databases, 1323 results were identified, followed by screening and 14 articles selected and included in the systematic review were obtained. Primary and secondary outcomes were measured through an RR with a 95% CI.Results: The primary outcome of T2DM remission was 15% in favor of VSG, RR: 1.15; [95% CI: 1.04 – 1.28]. For secondary outcomes, hypertension remission was 7% in favor of RR VSG: 1.07; [95% CI: 1.00 – 1.16]. Remission of dyslipidemia was 16% in favor of RR VSG: 1.16; [ 95% CI: 1.06 – 1.26]. BMI after surgery was in favor of RYGB MD: -1.31; [95% CI: -1.98 – -0.64]. For excess weight loss was in favor of VSG with a MD: 6.50; [95% CI: 4.99 – 8.01]. In relation to total cholesterol, they were favorable for RYGB in 65% MD: -0.35; [95% CI: -0.46 – -0.24], with a value of p<0.05. For LDL values our results were favorable for RYGB at 69% MD: -0.31; [95% CI: -0.45 – -0.16], p<0.01 value.Conclusion: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is more effective in DM2 remission, hypertension remission, dyslipidemia remission, weight loss compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more effective in lowering BMI, lowering total cholesterol, LDL and TG compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在缓解 2 型糖尿病方面,Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与垂直袖状胃切除术的比较:系统回顾与元分析
目的确定Roux-en-Y胃旁路术在缓解2型糖尿病方面是否比垂直袖带胃切除术更有效:在 Web of Science、Medline/PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Medline/Ovid 4 个数据库中进行了文献检索,确定了 1323 项结果,随后进行了筛选,最终选择了 14 篇文章纳入系统综述。主要和次要结果通过RR和95% CI来衡量:结果:T2DM缓解率为15%,而VSG为15%,RR为1.15;[95% CI:1.04 - 1.28]。在次要结果中,高血压缓解率为 7%,VSG 的 RR 为 1.07;[95% CI:1.00 - 1.16]。血脂异常缓解率为16%(RR VSG:1.16;[95% CI:1.06 - 1.26])。手术后的体重指数(BMI)为 RYGB MD:-1.31;[95% CI:-1.98 -0.64]。对于超重减肥,VSG 的 MD 值为 6.50;[95% CI:4.99 - 8.01]。在总胆固醇方面,RYGB 的 MD:-0.35;[95% CI:-0.46 --0.24],P<0.05。对于低密度脂蛋白值,我们的结果是 69% 的 MD 有利于 RYGB:-0.31;[95% CI:-0.45 -0.16],P 值<0.01:与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术相比,腹腔镜袖带胃切除术在 DM2 缓解、高血压缓解、血脂异常缓解和体重减轻方面更为有效。与腹腔镜袖带胃切除术相比,Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术在降低 BMI、降低总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白和总胆固醇方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Hemorrhoidal laser ablation procedure: a minimally invasive treatment for grades II, III, and IV using a 1470 nm diode laser The impact of adipose fat tissue on pathogenesis of crypto-glandular anal fistula Assessment of the usefulness and effectiveness of interactive telemedicine classes in surgery – survey of polish medical students The intraoperative application of indocyanine green (ICG), in breast reconstructive surgery using a latissimus dorsi flap, as a preventive factor for tissue ischemia and postoperative complications Analysis of risk factor for surgical site infection and other postoperative complications in patients following loop ileostomy reversal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1