Evaluation of the Effects of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma on Candida albicans Strains: An in vitro Study

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.5812/jjm-142236
Mahsa Najafi, E. Lotfali, Reyhaneh Shoorgashti, H. Ebrahimi, Simin Lesan
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effects of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma on Candida albicans Strains: An in vitro Study","authors":"Mahsa Najafi, E. Lotfali, Reyhaneh Shoorgashti, H. Ebrahimi, Simin Lesan","doi":"10.5812/jjm-142236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antifungal resistance is increasing, posing a challenge for treating candidiasis. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) is a potential alternative, but its association with traditional antifungals is poorly understood. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma on Candida albicans. Methods: In this in vitro study, C. albicans strains were irradiated with DBD plasma for 5, 10, and 15 minutes, both with and without nystatin. The number of colonies was counted, and the MTT method assessed Candida's survival. Data were analyzed with SPSS26. Results: This study showed that in both experimental groups, with and without nystatin, the lowest C. albicans cell viability was observed following a 10 minute DBD exposure within the groups subjected to plasma treatment (P < 0.001). The positive control group (nystatin without plasma exposure) exhibited a diminished count of viable cells in comparison to the group with 10 minute plasma irradiation without nystatin (P < 0.001). The 10 and 15 minute DBD plasma exposures, along with their positive control counterparts, demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in colony count compared to the 5 minute DBD exposure and the negative control groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Nystatin was more effective than DBD plasma irradiation in reducing C. albicans cell viability. When used in combination, 10 minute DBD plasma irradiation with nystatin was more effective than 5 or 15 minute irradiation times in reducing the survival rate of C. albicans.","PeriodicalId":17803,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-142236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antifungal resistance is increasing, posing a challenge for treating candidiasis. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) is a potential alternative, but its association with traditional antifungals is poorly understood. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma on Candida albicans. Methods: In this in vitro study, C. albicans strains were irradiated with DBD plasma for 5, 10, and 15 minutes, both with and without nystatin. The number of colonies was counted, and the MTT method assessed Candida's survival. Data were analyzed with SPSS26. Results: This study showed that in both experimental groups, with and without nystatin, the lowest C. albicans cell viability was observed following a 10 minute DBD exposure within the groups subjected to plasma treatment (P < 0.001). The positive control group (nystatin without plasma exposure) exhibited a diminished count of viable cells in comparison to the group with 10 minute plasma irradiation without nystatin (P < 0.001). The 10 and 15 minute DBD plasma exposures, along with their positive control counterparts, demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in colony count compared to the 5 minute DBD exposure and the negative control groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Nystatin was more effective than DBD plasma irradiation in reducing C. albicans cell viability. When used in combination, 10 minute DBD plasma irradiation with nystatin was more effective than 5 or 15 minute irradiation times in reducing the survival rate of C. albicans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估介质阻挡放电等离子体对白色念珠菌菌株的影响:体外研究
背景:抗真菌耐药性正在增加,给治疗念珠菌病带来了挑战。冷大气等离子体(CAP)是一种潜在的替代疗法,但人们对它与传统抗真菌药物之间的关系知之甚少。研究目的本研究旨在评估介质阻挡放电(DBD)等离子体对白色念珠菌的影响。方法:在这项体外研究中,用 DBD 等离子体照射白色念珠菌菌株 5、10 和 15 分钟,同时使用或不使用奈司他丁。计数菌落数量,并用 MTT 法评估白色念珠菌的存活率。数据用 SPSS26 进行分析。结果研究结果表明,在两个实验组中,无论是使用还是不使用硝司他丁,在暴露于 DBD 10 分钟后,观察到血浆处理组的白色念珠菌细胞存活率最低(P < 0.001)。阳性对照组(未暴露于等离子体的硝司他丁)与经过 10 分钟等离子体照射但未暴露于硝司他丁的组相比,存活细胞数量减少(P < 0.001)。与 5 分钟 DBD 照射组和阴性对照组相比,10 分钟和 15 分钟 DBD 血浆照射组及其阳性对照组的菌落数量在统计学上显著减少(P < 0.001)。结论:在降低白僵菌细胞活力方面,硝司他丁比 DBD 等离子照射更有效。在降低白僵菌存活率方面,10 分钟 DBD 等离子辐照与硝司他丁联合使用比 5 分钟或 15 分钟辐照更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, (JJM) is the official scientific Monthly publication of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. JJM is dedicated to the publication of manuscripts on topics concerning all aspects of microbiology. The topics include medical, veterinary and environmental microbiology, molecular investigations and infectious diseases. Aspects of immunology and epidemiology of infectious diseases are also considered.
期刊最新文献
A Perspective Study on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Voriconazole in Pediatric Patients with Hematologic Disorders Genomic Characterization and Antimicrobial Resistance of Four Mcr-1 Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Human and Environment Sources, Hainan Province, Tropical China IP-10, MIP1α, IL-6, and IL-1β as Biomarkers Associated with Disease Severity of COVID-19 Efficacy of Crude Extract from Streptomyces cellulosae Against Biofilm-Related Genes of Candida albicans Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis Genotyping of Biofilm-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1