Short-Term Evolution of Provision and Regulation Ecosystem Services in the Early Stage of Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration-Based System in Niger

Nouhou Salifou Jangorzo, Abou Soufianou Sadda, Sami Mari Ousmane, H. Issoufou
{"title":"Short-Term Evolution of Provision and Regulation Ecosystem Services in the Early Stage of Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration-Based System in Niger","authors":"Nouhou Salifou Jangorzo, Abou Soufianou Sadda, Sami Mari Ousmane, H. Issoufou","doi":"10.20546/ijcmas.2024.1301.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thousands of hectares have been treated with Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR) over many decades to reverse the adverse effects of land degradation. Many studies have attempted to evaluate the effect of this Soil Land Management (SLM) practice a posteriori. The aim of this study is to assess the evolution of Ecosystem Services (ES) in the first stage of FMNR based agroforestry system in Niger. We, therefore, monitored the evolution of Ecosystem services in sixty farmers (30 practicing FMNR and 30 without practicing FMNR) over three years (2017, 2018 and 2019). The year 2017 was considered as the reference year. Provisioning ecosystem services (agricultural production, fire, wood, service wood) and regulating services (Carbone sequestration) where quantified each year from the same farmers and in the same fields. All crop yields were quantified by biophysical measurements using a plot yield (10m x 10m) included in a larger plot (50m x 50m) for dendrometry measurements. Carbone sequestration was measured by soil carbon analysis and allometric equation for vegetation Carbone. The evolution of financial benefit is measured using Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA). The results showed that the increase in yields in FMNR fields compared to non-FMNR fields was not regular for all crops. Furthermore, the FMNR system improves the regulatory service, and hence, it stores a higher amount of organic carbon (605.5 mg / kg) than the systems without FMNR (432.5 mg / kg). The results of the CBA showed that the incremental cost is negative in 2017 but positive in 2018 and 2019. Therefore, the FMNR practice makes farmers wealthier. Soil Land Management Practices are financially profitable when all ecosystem services are quantified and valued.","PeriodicalId":13777,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2024.1301.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thousands of hectares have been treated with Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR) over many decades to reverse the adverse effects of land degradation. Many studies have attempted to evaluate the effect of this Soil Land Management (SLM) practice a posteriori. The aim of this study is to assess the evolution of Ecosystem Services (ES) in the first stage of FMNR based agroforestry system in Niger. We, therefore, monitored the evolution of Ecosystem services in sixty farmers (30 practicing FMNR and 30 without practicing FMNR) over three years (2017, 2018 and 2019). The year 2017 was considered as the reference year. Provisioning ecosystem services (agricultural production, fire, wood, service wood) and regulating services (Carbone sequestration) where quantified each year from the same farmers and in the same fields. All crop yields were quantified by biophysical measurements using a plot yield (10m x 10m) included in a larger plot (50m x 50m) for dendrometry measurements. Carbone sequestration was measured by soil carbon analysis and allometric equation for vegetation Carbone. The evolution of financial benefit is measured using Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA). The results showed that the increase in yields in FMNR fields compared to non-FMNR fields was not regular for all crops. Furthermore, the FMNR system improves the regulatory service, and hence, it stores a higher amount of organic carbon (605.5 mg / kg) than the systems without FMNR (432.5 mg / kg). The results of the CBA showed that the incremental cost is negative in 2017 but positive in 2018 and 2019. Therefore, the FMNR practice makes farmers wealthier. Soil Land Management Practices are financially profitable when all ecosystem services are quantified and valued.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日尔以农民管理为基础的自然再生系统初期提供和调节生态系统服务的短期演变情况
几十年来,成千上万公顷的土地经过农民管理的自然再生(FMNR)处理,以扭转土地退化的不利影响。许多研究都试图对这种土壤土地管理(SLM)做法的效果进行事后评估。本研究旨在评估尼日尔基于 FMNR 的农林系统第一阶段生态系统服务 (ES) 的演变情况。因此,我们在三年(2017、2018 和 2019 年)内监测了 60 位农民(30 位实施 FMNR 的农民和 30 位未实施 FMNR 的农民)的生态系统服务演变情况。2017 年被视为参照年。每年对相同农户和相同田地的提供性生态系统服务(农业生产、火灾、木材、役用木材)和调节性服务(碳固存)进行量化。所有作物产量均通过生物物理测量进行量化,测量方法是将一块产量为 10 米 x 10 米的地块纳入一块更大的地块(50 米 x 50 米)中进行测深测量。碳固存通过土壤碳分析和植被碳异速方程进行测量。经济效益的变化是通过成本效益分析(CBA)来衡量的。结果表明,与非调频核磁共振田块相比,调频核磁共振田块的增产对所有作物来说都不具有规律性。此外,FMNR 系统改善了调节服务,因此,它储存的有机碳量(605.5 毫克/千克)高于无 FMNR 系统(432.5 毫克/千克)。成本效益分析结果显示,2017 年的增量成本为负,但 2018 年和 2019 年为正。因此,FMNR 实践使农民更加富裕。如果对所有生态系统服务进行量化和估价,土壤土地管理实践在经济上是有利可图的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Molecular Characterization of Azotobacter and PSB from Xerophytic Plants of Maharashtra State, India Ethno-botanical Study of Some Important Climbers and Lianas of Adumalleshwara (Jogimatti) of Chitradurga, Karnataka Meta-Topolin Induced Shoot Organogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Different Explants of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) An OMICS-Based Approach Studies Natural Products Study on Enzyme Activities and Nutrient Availability in Calcareous Soil as Influence by Phytase and FYM Levels under Soybean Cultivation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1