Efficacy of LRINEC Scoring in Patients of Necrotizing Fasciitis and its Correlation with the Outcome

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Polish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0053.9502
Sumit Kumar, Suhas Agarwal, Gaurav Patel, Ishan Sehgal, Sandeep Gara, Pushkar Yadav
{"title":"Efficacy of LRINEC Scoring in Patients of Necrotizing Fasciitis and its Correlation with the Outcome","authors":"Sumit Kumar, Suhas Agarwal, Gaurav Patel, Ishan Sehgal, Sandeep Gara, Pushkar Yadav","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground: Necrotizing fasciitis is an expeditiously escalating inflammatory infection of the fascia, with secondary necrosis of the subcutaneous tissues. To aid diagnosis, the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) scoring system was devised to stratify the likelihood of infection in patients on presentation. Objectives: Study aimed to investigate and quantify the relationships between the LRINEC scoring system and the outcomes such as need for amputation, length of hospital and mortality stay in patients with necrotizing fasciitis. Method: A total number of 90 Patients were admitted with a provisional diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. LRINEC score was calculated for each case based on six laboratory variables at the time of presentation. Enrolled patients were divided into three groups on the basis of LRINEC score. The differences in mortality, length of hospitalization, number of debridement and the need of amputation between these groups were compared. Results: Increasing age, male gender, DM has a poor prognosis in the outcome of necrotizing fasciitis patients. The amputation rates and mortality rates are better correlated with higher LRINEC score. Conclusion: The LRINEC score helps in stratifying the patients into risk categories such as low risk, moderate risk and high risk categories, according to severity in a much organized way and the appropriate management like surgical debridement can be started timely. LRINEC score is a robust index that is capable of detecting early cases of necrotizing fasciitis and is simple enough for routine use. It is a simplified bedside diagnostic tool for early diagnosis and prediction of outcome in patients of necrotizing fasciitis.","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground: Necrotizing fasciitis is an expeditiously escalating inflammatory infection of the fascia, with secondary necrosis of the subcutaneous tissues. To aid diagnosis, the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) scoring system was devised to stratify the likelihood of infection in patients on presentation. Objectives: Study aimed to investigate and quantify the relationships between the LRINEC scoring system and the outcomes such as need for amputation, length of hospital and mortality stay in patients with necrotizing fasciitis. Method: A total number of 90 Patients were admitted with a provisional diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. LRINEC score was calculated for each case based on six laboratory variables at the time of presentation. Enrolled patients were divided into three groups on the basis of LRINEC score. The differences in mortality, length of hospitalization, number of debridement and the need of amputation between these groups were compared. Results: Increasing age, male gender, DM has a poor prognosis in the outcome of necrotizing fasciitis patients. The amputation rates and mortality rates are better correlated with higher LRINEC score. Conclusion: The LRINEC score helps in stratifying the patients into risk categories such as low risk, moderate risk and high risk categories, according to severity in a much organized way and the appropriate management like surgical debridement can be started timely. LRINEC score is a robust index that is capable of detecting early cases of necrotizing fasciitis and is simple enough for routine use. It is a simplified bedside diagnostic tool for early diagnosis and prediction of outcome in patients of necrotizing fasciitis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坏死性筋膜炎患者 LRINEC 评分的有效性及其与预后的相关性
摘要背景:坏死性筋膜炎是一种迅速升级的筋膜炎症感染,继发皮下组织坏死。为了帮助诊断,我们设计了坏死性筋膜炎实验室风险指标(LRINEC)评分系统,对患者发病时感染的可能性进行分层。研究目的研究旨在调查和量化 LRINEC 评分系统与坏死性筋膜炎患者截肢需求、住院时间和死亡率等结果之间的关系。研究方法共收治了 90 名初步诊断为坏死性筋膜炎的患者。根据患者发病时的六个实验室变量计算每个病例的 LRINEC 评分。根据 LRINEC 评分将入选患者分为三组。比较三组患者在死亡率、住院时间、清创次数和截肢需求方面的差异。结果如下年龄增大、男性、糖尿病对坏死性筋膜炎患者的预后影响较差。截肢率和死亡率与 LRINEC 评分越高越相关。结论LRINEC 评分有助于根据严重程度有条理地将患者分为低危、中危和高危等风险类别,并及时采取适当的治疗措施,如手术清创。LRINEC 评分是一个强大的指数,能够检测出坏死性筋膜炎的早期病例,而且简单易用,适合常规使用。它是一种简化的床旁诊断工具,可用于坏死性筋膜炎患者的早期诊断和预后预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Hemorrhoidal laser ablation procedure: a minimally invasive treatment for grades II, III, and IV using a 1470 nm diode laser The impact of adipose fat tissue on pathogenesis of crypto-glandular anal fistula Assessment of the usefulness and effectiveness of interactive telemedicine classes in surgery – survey of polish medical students The intraoperative application of indocyanine green (ICG), in breast reconstructive surgery using a latissimus dorsi flap, as a preventive factor for tissue ischemia and postoperative complications Analysis of risk factor for surgical site infection and other postoperative complications in patients following loop ileostomy reversal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1