Navigating through the Cracks of the State System: Shifting Spaces of Hope in the Portuguese Mobility Regime

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropological Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1353/anq.2024.a923085
Elizabeth Challinor
{"title":"Navigating through the Cracks of the State System: Shifting Spaces of Hope in the Portuguese Mobility Regime","authors":"Elizabeth Challinor","doi":"10.1353/anq.2024.a923085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Portugal's tolerance towards irregular migration and its relatively extensive citizenship rights, in comparison with other European countries, have contributed towards its reputation as a migrant friendly state. However, when the state turns a blind eye to the irregular status of migrants and when the outsourcing of refugee reception to civil society fails to deliver according to Weberian expectations of an orderly, rational bureaucracy, who has the right to call whom to account? Through an examination of the blurred accountabilities in different sites of service provision in Portugal, the article examines the complex, shifting and incomplete strategies employed by social workers, civil society hosting staff and migrants in struggles over claims and resources. The challenges are like those of a game of cards in which players, searching for clarification regarding the rules of the game and how to apply or even manipulate them, may be partners in one round and adversaries in the next. These sites of struggle extend beyond two-sided confrontations between bureaucrats and their clients to include the wider structural context with its multiple actors, multiple accountabilities, and complex positionalities at play. A common outcome in these struggles for migrants and service providers alike is a transition from hope in state service delivery to hope in their own ability to navigate the system. There are limits to what service providers can achieve due to the structural conditions beyond their control. When they fail to deliver, relations between migrants and service providers sour. Feeling that clients have acted contrary to their expectations of compliant gratitude, service providers employ strategies which range from cutting relationships altogether to providing minimal formal support and questioning their own reactions. Migrants, believing that they have been let down or even tricked by the state, may even feel legitimatized to trick it in return.","PeriodicalId":51536,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2024.a923085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Portugal's tolerance towards irregular migration and its relatively extensive citizenship rights, in comparison with other European countries, have contributed towards its reputation as a migrant friendly state. However, when the state turns a blind eye to the irregular status of migrants and when the outsourcing of refugee reception to civil society fails to deliver according to Weberian expectations of an orderly, rational bureaucracy, who has the right to call whom to account? Through an examination of the blurred accountabilities in different sites of service provision in Portugal, the article examines the complex, shifting and incomplete strategies employed by social workers, civil society hosting staff and migrants in struggles over claims and resources. The challenges are like those of a game of cards in which players, searching for clarification regarding the rules of the game and how to apply or even manipulate them, may be partners in one round and adversaries in the next. These sites of struggle extend beyond two-sided confrontations between bureaucrats and their clients to include the wider structural context with its multiple actors, multiple accountabilities, and complex positionalities at play. A common outcome in these struggles for migrants and service providers alike is a transition from hope in state service delivery to hope in their own ability to navigate the system. There are limits to what service providers can achieve due to the structural conditions beyond their control. When they fail to deliver, relations between migrants and service providers sour. Feeling that clients have acted contrary to their expectations of compliant gratitude, service providers employ strategies which range from cutting relationships altogether to providing minimal formal support and questioning their own reactions. Migrants, believing that they have been let down or even tricked by the state, may even feel legitimatized to trick it in return.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
穿越国家制度的裂缝:葡萄牙流动制度中不断变化的希望空间
ABSTRACT: 与其他欧洲国家相比,葡萄牙对非正常移民的宽容和相对广泛的公民权利,使其享有移民友好国家的美誉。然而,当国家对移民的非正常身份视而不见,当将难民接待工作外包给民间社会的做法无法实现韦伯对有序、理性的官僚机构的期望时,谁有权要求谁承担责任?文章通过对葡萄牙不同服务提供场所中模糊的问责制的研究,探讨了社会工作者、民间社会接待人员和移民在争夺权利主张和资源时所采用的复杂、多变和不完整的策略。这些挑战就像纸牌游戏一样,玩家们在游戏中寻求对游戏规则的澄清,以及如何应用甚至操纵这些规则,在这一轮游戏中可能是合作伙伴,而在下一轮游戏中则可能是对手。这些斗争的场所超出了官僚与客户之间的双面对抗,还包括更广泛的结构性背景,其中有多个参与者、多重责任和复杂的地位。移民和服务提供者在这些斗争中的一个共同结果是从对国家提供服务的希望转变为对自身驾驭该系统能力的希望。由于服务提供者无法控制的结构性条件,他们所能实现的目标是有限的。当服务提供者无法提供服务时,移民与服务提供者之间的关系就会恶化。服务提供者认为客户的行为违背了他们对顺从的感激的期望,因此会采取各种策略,从完全切断关系到提供最低限度的正式支持以及质疑自己的反应。移民认为自己被国家辜负了,甚至被国家欺骗了,他们甚至会觉得欺骗国家是合法的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Since 1921, Anthropological Quarterly has published scholarly articles, review articles, book reviews, and lists of recently published books in all areas of sociocultural anthropology. Its goal is the rapid dissemination of articles that blend precision with humanism, and scrupulous analysis with meticulous description.
期刊最新文献
Navigating through the Cracks of the State System: Shifting Spaces of Hope in the Portuguese Mobility Regime Bigger Fish to Fry: A Theory of Cooking as Risk, with Greek Examples by David E. Sutton (review) The Great Outboard Debate: Negotiating Materiality and Dispossession in a Southeast Asian Marine Hunting Community Settling History in Silwan: State Emblems and Public Secrets in Occupied East Jerusalem Transcendent Images: Saintly Devotion, Art, and Indigenous Sovereignty in Oaxacan Transnational Migration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1