Prevalence of middle mesial root canal in mandibular molars in an Iranian population: A micro-computed tomography study

Q2 Dentistry Dental Research Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/drj.drj_54_23
Alireza Farhad, M. Hasheminia, E. Hekmatian, Vahid Mojiri
{"title":"Prevalence of middle mesial root canal in mandibular molars in an Iranian population: A micro-computed tomography study","authors":"Alireza Farhad, M. Hasheminia, E. Hekmatian, Vahid Mojiri","doi":"10.4103/drj.drj_54_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: Knowledge about the anatomic variations of the root canal system and their prevalence is necessary for clinicians to ideally clean the root canal system. The anatomic complexity of the root canal system is one of the reasons for its inadequate debridement, resulting in residual microorganisms and root canal treatment failure. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of middle mesial root canals in mandibular molars in an Iranian population. Materials and Methods: The samples in the present descriptive/cross-sectional study consisted of mandibular first and second molars (n = 100, with 50 first and 50 s molars). A convenient sampling method was used to collect samples. The teeth were mounted in gypsum and scanned using a micro-computed tomography unit. The images were reconstructed with software, and the relevant checklist was completed by the observers. The data were analyzed with SPSS v26 using the Chi-squared test at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The prevalence of the middle mesial root canal in the present study was 36% for mandibular first molars and 22% for mandibular second molars, with an overall prevalence of 29%. The prevalence of the middle mesial root canal was not significantly different between the first and second mandibular molars (P = 0.12). The mean distance between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual root canal orifices in the teeth with a middle mesial root canal was significantly higher than in those without the middle mesial root canal (P < 0.001). In addition, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of the middle mesial root canal between the teeth with and without the second distal root canal (P = 0.89). Conclusion: The prevalence of the middle mesial root canal in the studied population was 29%, which is significant clinically. In addition, the mean distance between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual root canal orifices in teeth with a middle mesial root canal was higher than that in teeth without this root canal.","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_54_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Knowledge about the anatomic variations of the root canal system and their prevalence is necessary for clinicians to ideally clean the root canal system. The anatomic complexity of the root canal system is one of the reasons for its inadequate debridement, resulting in residual microorganisms and root canal treatment failure. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of middle mesial root canals in mandibular molars in an Iranian population. Materials and Methods: The samples in the present descriptive/cross-sectional study consisted of mandibular first and second molars (n = 100, with 50 first and 50 s molars). A convenient sampling method was used to collect samples. The teeth were mounted in gypsum and scanned using a micro-computed tomography unit. The images were reconstructed with software, and the relevant checklist was completed by the observers. The data were analyzed with SPSS v26 using the Chi-squared test at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The prevalence of the middle mesial root canal in the present study was 36% for mandibular first molars and 22% for mandibular second molars, with an overall prevalence of 29%. The prevalence of the middle mesial root canal was not significantly different between the first and second mandibular molars (P = 0.12). The mean distance between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual root canal orifices in the teeth with a middle mesial root canal was significantly higher than in those without the middle mesial root canal (P < 0.001). In addition, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of the middle mesial root canal between the teeth with and without the second distal root canal (P = 0.89). Conclusion: The prevalence of the middle mesial root canal in the studied population was 29%, which is significant clinically. In addition, the mean distance between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual root canal orifices in teeth with a middle mesial root canal was higher than that in teeth without this root canal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗人口中下颌臼齿中中根管的患病率:一项微型计算机断层扫描研究
摘要 背景:了解根管系统的解剖变异及其流行情况对于临床医生理想地清洁根管系统非常必要。根管系统解剖学上的复杂性是导致清创不彻底、微生物残留和根管治疗失败的原因之一。本研究旨在评估伊朗人群中下颌磨牙中中根管的患病率。材料和方法:本描述性/横断面研究的样本包括下颌第一和第二磨牙(n = 100,其中第一和第二磨牙各为 50)。样本采集采用了方便的抽样方法。将牙齿装在石膏中,使用微型计算机断层扫描装置进行扫描。使用软件对图像进行重建,并由观察者填写相关核对表。数据使用 SPSS v26 进行分析,采用卡方检验,显著性水平为 P <0.05。结果在本研究中,下颌第一磨牙中中间根管的患病率为 36%,下颌第二磨牙为 22%,总患病率为 29%。下颌第一磨牙和下颌第二磨牙的中间根管患病率无明显差异(P = 0.12)。有中间中牙根管的牙齿中颊根管口和中叶根管口之间的平均距离明显高于没有中间中牙根管的牙齿(P < 0.001)。此外,有第二远端根管的牙齿和没有第二远端根管的牙齿在中中层根管的患病率上没有明显差异(P = 0.89)。结论研究人群中中间根管的患病率为 29%,这在临床上意义重大。此外,有中中根管的牙齿的颊中根管口和舌中根管口之间的平均距离高于没有中中根管的牙齿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
Bcl-2 and galectin-3 expression is associated with recurrence of ameloblastoma. Evaluation of antifungal effect of amphotericin B in comparison with nystatin on Candida species derived from patients undergoing head-and-neck radiotherapy. Comparison of periapical parallel radiography with cbct with different field of views (FOV) for the detection of periapical lesions. Antifungal effect of atorvastatin in comparison with fluconazole on Candida species isolated from patients undergoing head-and-neck radiotherapy. Antibacterial effect of 940 nm diode laser on Enterococcus faecalis-infected root canals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1