The Effects of Social Distance and Gender on Moral Decisions and Judgments

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1027/1864-9335/a000537
Zoé Szczepaniak, Aurore Gaboriaud, J. Quinton, A. Smeding
{"title":"The Effects of Social Distance and Gender on Moral Decisions and Judgments","authors":"Zoé Szczepaniak, Aurore Gaboriaud, J. Quinton, A. Smeding","doi":"10.1027/1864-9335/a000537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In morality, social distance should influence judgments and decisions. Singer et al.’s (2019) Everyday Moral Conflict Situations scale was created to assess altruistic versus egoistic choices in everyday moral contexts depending on social distance manipulated at the item level. Via a reanalysis of their data, we found an unreported interaction effect between social distance and gender on behavioral choices. We conducted a conceptual replication (Part 1) and extended previous research by empirically assessing the link between altruism and morality (Part 2). This pre-registered study ( N = 299) confirmed the gender-by-social distance interaction, with a stronger social distance effect for males and for egoistic behaviors. Furthermore, behavioral choices were linked to moral judgments of wrongness. Limitations and future directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47278,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In morality, social distance should influence judgments and decisions. Singer et al.’s (2019) Everyday Moral Conflict Situations scale was created to assess altruistic versus egoistic choices in everyday moral contexts depending on social distance manipulated at the item level. Via a reanalysis of their data, we found an unreported interaction effect between social distance and gender on behavioral choices. We conducted a conceptual replication (Part 1) and extended previous research by empirically assessing the link between altruism and morality (Part 2). This pre-registered study ( N = 299) confirmed the gender-by-social distance interaction, with a stronger social distance effect for males and for egoistic behaviors. Furthermore, behavioral choices were linked to moral judgments of wrongness. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会距离和性别对道德决定和判断的影响
摘要:在道德方面,社会距离应影响判断和决策。Singer等人(2019)设计了 "日常道德冲突情境 "量表,以评估日常道德情境中利他主义与利己主义的选择,这取决于在项目水平上操纵的社会距离。通过对他们的数据进行重新分析,我们发现社会距离和性别对行为选择之间存在一种未报告的交互效应。我们进行了概念复制(第 1 部分),并通过实证评估利他主义与道德之间的联系(第 2 部分)扩展了之前的研究。这项预先登记的研究(N = 299)证实了性别与社会距离之间的相互作用,男性和利己主义行为的社会距离效应更强。此外,行为选择还与对错误的道德判断有关。本文讨论了研究的局限性和未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Psychology
Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Take Me Out of the Loop Quality, Replicability, and Transparency in Research in Social Psychology Can Asymmetric Punishment Explain Norm Changes? Us and Ours Working Too Hard or Not Hard Enough?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1