Future VAT Regime for Financial Services from a Stakeholder Perspective: Analysis of the European Commission 2020 Public Consultation’s Position Papers

Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2024004
Rafaela Pardete, Márcia C. Santos, Francisco Leote
{"title":"Future VAT Regime for Financial Services from a Stakeholder Perspective: Analysis of the European Commission 2020 Public Consultation’s Position Papers","authors":"Rafaela Pardete, Márcia C. Santos, Francisco Leote","doi":"10.54648/ecta2024004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study sought to address the challenges of formulating the European Union’s value-added tax (VAT) reform for the financial services sector and implementing the proposed changes. The concerns and suggestions submitted by this sector’s stakeholders during the European Commission’s 2021 public consultation are used as inputs. The research included automated computer-assisted content analysis of fifty-two position papers, using up-to-date text mining techniques to define four cluster containing the most salient terms. An in-depth critical review highlighted the most significant concerns and suggested alterations to the current VAT framework. The results include a three-layered discussion model that goes well beyond a straightforward one-shot discussion of whether financial services should charge VAT. First, the technical rationality view of not charging VAT when providing financial services is no longer applicable. Second, intermediary and cost-sharing groups are characteristic of these services, which puts into question the tax’s neutrality principle if the current VAT exemption regime remains in place. Last, abolishing the VAT exemption for these services could put an especially heavy burden on end consumers and small businesses, thereby implying extra measures will be needed to avoid a strongly negative socioeconomic impact. Significant implications for theory, practice and policy are presented.\nValue-added tax (VAT), Financial service, Insurance service, Tax policy, Public consultation, European Commission, Data mining, VOSviewer","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2024004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study sought to address the challenges of formulating the European Union’s value-added tax (VAT) reform for the financial services sector and implementing the proposed changes. The concerns and suggestions submitted by this sector’s stakeholders during the European Commission’s 2021 public consultation are used as inputs. The research included automated computer-assisted content analysis of fifty-two position papers, using up-to-date text mining techniques to define four cluster containing the most salient terms. An in-depth critical review highlighted the most significant concerns and suggested alterations to the current VAT framework. The results include a three-layered discussion model that goes well beyond a straightforward one-shot discussion of whether financial services should charge VAT. First, the technical rationality view of not charging VAT when providing financial services is no longer applicable. Second, intermediary and cost-sharing groups are characteristic of these services, which puts into question the tax’s neutrality principle if the current VAT exemption regime remains in place. Last, abolishing the VAT exemption for these services could put an especially heavy burden on end consumers and small businesses, thereby implying extra measures will be needed to avoid a strongly negative socioeconomic impact. Significant implications for theory, practice and policy are presented. Value-added tax (VAT), Financial service, Insurance service, Tax policy, Public consultation, European Commission, Data mining, VOSviewer
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
从利益相关者的角度看未来金融服务增值税制度:对欧盟委员会 2020 年公众咨询立场文件的分析
本研究旨在应对欧盟金融服务业增值税(VAT)改革的制定和拟议改革的实施所面临的挑战。该部门的利益相关者在欧盟委员会 2021 年公众咨询期间提交的关注问题和建议被用作投入。研究包括对 52 份立场文件进行自动计算机辅助内容分析,利用最新的文本挖掘技术定义了包含最突出术语的四个群组。深入的批判性审查强调了最重要的关注点,并对现行增值税框架提出了修改建议。研究结果包括一个三层讨论模型,该模型远远超出了对金融服务是否应征收增值税的一次性直接讨论。首先,在提供金融服务时不征收增值税的技术合理性观点不再适用。其次,中介和成本分担群体是这些服务的特点,如果现行的增值税免税制度继续存在,税收的中立性原则就会受到质疑。最后,取消这些服务的增值税免税可能会给最终消费者和小企业带来特别沉重的负担,从而意味着需要采取额外的措施来避免对社会经济造成严重的负面影响。增值税(VAT), 金融服务, 保险服务, 税收政策, 公众咨询, 欧盟委员会, 数据挖掘, VOSviewer
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1