Biomechanical aging behaviour of clear aligners

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Australasian Orthodontic Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2478/aoj-2024-0006
Li Mei, Carrol Jin, Aishah Na, Jamie Marra, Simon Guan, J. Choi
{"title":"Biomechanical aging behaviour of clear aligners","authors":"Li Mei, Carrol Jin, Aishah Na, Jamie Marra, Simon Guan, J. Choi","doi":"10.2478/aoj-2024-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The biomechanical behaviour of clear aligners can affect the clinical efficacy of tooth movement.\n \n \n \n To investigate the aging effects of clear aligners to suggest an optimal wear time from the biomechanical perspective.\n \n \n \n Brand new “as-received” (0-day) clear aligners (Invisalign, Align Co., USA) were immersed in distilled water and placed in an incubator at a constant temperature of 37°C for 21 days to simulate the aging process encountered in the oral cavity. The biomechanical properties (flexural strength, translucency, surface roughness, hardness, and tensile strength) of the clear aligners were assessed each day. The flexural strength was measured using a digital tension gauge; translucency was assessed using the Vita Easyshade digital spectrophotometer; surface roughness was measured using a profilometer; hardness was measured by the indentation test; and tensile strength was measured using a universal testing machine.\n \n \n \n The flexural strength decreased significantly after 7 days (0.22 ± 0.01 N at 3 mm compression; 0.35 ± 0.01 N at 5 mm compression) compared with the baseline (0.26 ± 0.01 N, 0.41 ± 0.01 N, respectively) (difference = 0.15 N, p < 0.05 for both). The hardness decreased significantly after 10 days (4.37 ± 0.48 kgf/mm2) compared with the baseline (6.60 ± 0.43 kgf/mm2) (difference = 2.23 kgf/mm2, p < 0.05). No significant change was found in translucency (p = 0.38), internal surface roughness (p = 0.99), external surface roughness (p = 0.57), and tensile strength (p = 0.84) during the 21 days of simulated aging.\n \n \n \n The flexural strength and hardness of the clear aligners decreased significantly after 7 days and 10 days, respectively. Surface roughness, translucency, and tensile strength varied little during the 21 days of artificial aging.\n","PeriodicalId":48559,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Orthodontic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2024-0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The biomechanical behaviour of clear aligners can affect the clinical efficacy of tooth movement. To investigate the aging effects of clear aligners to suggest an optimal wear time from the biomechanical perspective. Brand new “as-received” (0-day) clear aligners (Invisalign, Align Co., USA) were immersed in distilled water and placed in an incubator at a constant temperature of 37°C for 21 days to simulate the aging process encountered in the oral cavity. The biomechanical properties (flexural strength, translucency, surface roughness, hardness, and tensile strength) of the clear aligners were assessed each day. The flexural strength was measured using a digital tension gauge; translucency was assessed using the Vita Easyshade digital spectrophotometer; surface roughness was measured using a profilometer; hardness was measured by the indentation test; and tensile strength was measured using a universal testing machine. The flexural strength decreased significantly after 7 days (0.22 ± 0.01 N at 3 mm compression; 0.35 ± 0.01 N at 5 mm compression) compared with the baseline (0.26 ± 0.01 N, 0.41 ± 0.01 N, respectively) (difference = 0.15 N, p < 0.05 for both). The hardness decreased significantly after 10 days (4.37 ± 0.48 kgf/mm2) compared with the baseline (6.60 ± 0.43 kgf/mm2) (difference = 2.23 kgf/mm2, p < 0.05). No significant change was found in translucency (p = 0.38), internal surface roughness (p = 0.99), external surface roughness (p = 0.57), and tensile strength (p = 0.84) during the 21 days of simulated aging. The flexural strength and hardness of the clear aligners decreased significantly after 7 days and 10 days, respectively. Surface roughness, translucency, and tensile strength varied little during the 21 days of artificial aging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透明矫形器的生物力学老化特性
透明矫治器的生物力学特性会影响牙齿移动的临床疗效。 为了研究透明矫治器的老化效应,从生物力学角度提出最佳佩戴时间。 将全新的 "收货时"(0 天)透明矫治器(Invisalign,Align Co., USA)浸入蒸馏水中,在 37°C 恒温培养箱中放置 21 天,以模拟口腔中的老化过程。每天对透明矫治器的生物力学特性(抗弯强度、半透明度、表面粗糙度、硬度和拉伸强度)进行评估。挠曲强度用数字拉力计测量;透光度用 Vita Easyshade 数字分光光度计评估;表面粗糙度用轮廓仪测量;硬度用压痕测试测量;拉伸强度用万能试验机测量。 与基线值(分别为 0.26 ± 0.01 N 和 0.41 ± 0.01 N)相比,7 天后的抗弯强度明显下降(3 mm 压缩时为 0.22 ± 0.01 N;5 mm 压缩时为 0.35 ± 0.01 N)(两者的差异 = 0.15 N,p < 0.05)。与基线值(6.60 ± 0.43 kgf/mm2)相比,10 天后硬度明显下降(4.37 ± 0.48 kgf/mm2)(差异 = 2.23 kgf/mm2,p < 0.05)。在 21 天的模拟老化过程中,半透明度(p = 0.38)、内表面粗糙度(p = 0.99)、外表面粗糙度(p = 0.57)和拉伸强度(p = 0.84)均无明显变化。 透明矫治器的抗弯强度和硬度分别在 7 天和 10 天后显著下降。在 21 天的人工老化过程中,表面粗糙度、半透明度和拉伸强度变化不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Orthodontic Journal
Australasian Orthodontic Journal Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Australasian Orthodontic Journal (AOJ) is the official scientific publication of the Australian Society of Orthodontists. Previously titled the Australian Orthodontic Journal, the name of the publication was changed in 2017 to provide the region with additional representation because of a substantial increase in the number of submitted overseas'' manuscripts. The volume and issue numbers continue in sequence and only the ISSN numbers have been updated. The AOJ publishes original research papers, clinical reports, book reviews, abstracts from other journals, and other material which is of interest to orthodontists and is in the interest of their continuing education. It is published twice a year in November and May. The AOJ is indexed and abstracted by Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) and Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition.
期刊最新文献
Discrepancy index, treatment complexity index and objective Grading system: correlation between parameters, indices and implications for treatment ChatGPT in orthodontics: limitations and possibilities Orthodontists’ perception and attitude toward accelerated orthodontic treatments in Australia Multidimensional tooth movement boundaries in the extended aesthetic zone: a cone-beam computed tomography study Efficacy of in-house clear aligner therapy mechanics on root torque: an in-vitro study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1