“This Land of Thorns Is Not Habitable”: Diagnosing the Despair of Racialized Meta-oppression

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Critical Philosophy of Race Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5325/critphilrace.12.1.0126
Jacqueline Renée Scott
{"title":"“This Land of Thorns Is Not Habitable”: Diagnosing the Despair of Racialized Meta-oppression","authors":"Jacqueline Renée Scott","doi":"10.5325/critphilrace.12.1.0126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article addresses the growing literature in critical race studies, which holds that racism is permanent or incurable, and that by adopting this pessimistic view of racism, we can enact improved and healthier racialized lives. I argue that the focus on curing anti-Black racism, and the failure to do so in the civil rights era and its aftermath has left people of all races, to varying degrees, stuck in pessimistic states of racialized anger, resentment, guilt, and shame. These pessimistic states have brought about an additional level of oppression for targets of racialized oppression. I call it “meta-oppression,” and it is the oppression of being oppressed. I argue that this oppression has exacerbated the effects of the social disease of racism, and it has literally affected the physiologies of many African Americans. This article provides a diagnosis of these existential and physiological states of meta-oppression and a clarification of its characteristics. This diagnosis is an initial step in a larger project of formulating and enacting effective treatments for it. I then argue that meta-oppression is a helpful diagnostic tool for clarifying the characteristics and ramifications on Blacks of US systemic racism during the post–civil rights movement period. I aim to establish meta-oppression as an existential and physiological condition that requires attention so as to expand the social imaginations of people of color and to allow us to engage in more systemic joyful affirmations of our racialized lives while still living within racist conditions.","PeriodicalId":43337,"journal":{"name":"Critical Philosophy of Race","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Philosophy of Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.12.1.0126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses the growing literature in critical race studies, which holds that racism is permanent or incurable, and that by adopting this pessimistic view of racism, we can enact improved and healthier racialized lives. I argue that the focus on curing anti-Black racism, and the failure to do so in the civil rights era and its aftermath has left people of all races, to varying degrees, stuck in pessimistic states of racialized anger, resentment, guilt, and shame. These pessimistic states have brought about an additional level of oppression for targets of racialized oppression. I call it “meta-oppression,” and it is the oppression of being oppressed. I argue that this oppression has exacerbated the effects of the social disease of racism, and it has literally affected the physiologies of many African Americans. This article provides a diagnosis of these existential and physiological states of meta-oppression and a clarification of its characteristics. This diagnosis is an initial step in a larger project of formulating and enacting effective treatments for it. I then argue that meta-oppression is a helpful diagnostic tool for clarifying the characteristics and ramifications on Blacks of US systemic racism during the post–civil rights movement period. I aim to establish meta-oppression as an existential and physiological condition that requires attention so as to expand the social imaginations of people of color and to allow us to engage in more systemic joyful affirmations of our racialized lives while still living within racist conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"这片荆棘之地不适合居住":诊断种族化元压迫的绝望情绪
本文论述了批判性种族研究中日益增多的文献,这些文献认为种族主义是永久性的或不可治愈的,通过采用这种对种族主义的悲观看法,我们可以制定更好、更健康的种族化生活。我认为,在民权时代及其之后,人们一直关注如何治愈反黑人的种族主义,但却没能做到这一点,这在不同程度上让所有种族的人都陷入了种族化的愤怒、怨恨、内疚和羞愧等悲观状态。这些悲观状态给种族化压迫的对象带来了额外的压迫。我称之为 "元压迫",即被压迫的压迫。我认为,这种压迫加剧了种族主义这一社会疾病的影响,对许多非裔美国人的生理产生了切实的影响。本文对这些元压迫的存在和生理状态进行了诊断,并阐明了其特征。这一诊断是为元压迫制定和实施有效治疗这一更大计划的第一步。然后,我认为元压迫是一种有用的诊断工具,有助于澄清后民权运动时期美国系统性种族主义的特征及其对黑人的影响。我的目标是将元压迫确立为一种需要关注的存在和生理状况,从而拓展有色人种的社会想象力,让我们在生活在种族主义环境中的同时,能够更加系统地快乐地肯定我们的种族化生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Philosophy of Race
Critical Philosophy of Race ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.
期刊最新文献
Slavery and Race: Philosophical Debates in the Eighteenth Century “Without Losing Sight of the Concrete”: Critical and Metacritical Theories of Race Reparations for Reproductive Slavery and Its Afterlives The Colonial Contract and the Coloniality Of Gender: Decolonial Feminist Reflections on Charles Mills’s Racia-Sexual Contract The Combahee River Collective Statement and Black Feminist Universalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1