Quality improvement project to improve inhaler delivery in the intensive care unit

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20101058241241915
QinHao Jonathan Ye, Ganesh Kalyanasundaram, Hsiao Peng Toh, Qian Wen Leo, Linda Marie Nathan, Aubrey Cunanan, Han Ying Jessica Tan, Kiran Sharma
{"title":"Quality improvement project to improve inhaler delivery in the intensive care unit","authors":"QinHao Jonathan Ye, Ganesh Kalyanasundaram, Hsiao Peng Toh, Qian Wen Leo, Linda Marie Nathan, Aubrey Cunanan, Han Ying Jessica Tan, Kiran Sharma","doi":"10.1177/20101058241241915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Late 2022, an ICU nurse discovered that Seretide™ (salmeterol/Fluticasone) Evohaler, a commonly used inhaler, did not change its dose counter when used with the inhaler connector 22M-22F. This was identified as a medication safety issue. Knowledge gaps of inhaler use in mechanically ventilated patients were identified as well. To effectively administer metered dose inhalers to ventilated patients and increase its accuracy and safety. We instituted education programs for healthcare professional in the ICU and introduced a new inhaler connector RTC 24-V. This was compared with the existing 22M-22F connector in a comparative study. The dose counter of Seretide™ recorded prior to initiation and extubation showed an obvious drop in doses ranging from 15 to 63 in patients randomized to use RTC 24-V, compared to 0 to 2 drop in doses for patients using 22M-22F. A total of 51 pre study and 33 post study questionnaires were completed. Confidence that the accurate dose of medications was administered rose from 58.8% to 84.8% after using the RTC 24-V. Responses that there was no issue compromising patient safety rose from 0% to 51.5% and fewer staff expressed concern about disconnections causing infections, dropping from 51% to 9.1%. 93.9% of respondents chose the new RTC 24-V as the preferred inhaler connector. The new inhaler connector RTC 24-V was assessed to have less medication errors. ICU healthcare professionals expressed greater confidence in its safety and accuracy. We will implement the use of this connector with continued medical education.","PeriodicalId":44685,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20101058241241915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Late 2022, an ICU nurse discovered that Seretide™ (salmeterol/Fluticasone) Evohaler, a commonly used inhaler, did not change its dose counter when used with the inhaler connector 22M-22F. This was identified as a medication safety issue. Knowledge gaps of inhaler use in mechanically ventilated patients were identified as well. To effectively administer metered dose inhalers to ventilated patients and increase its accuracy and safety. We instituted education programs for healthcare professional in the ICU and introduced a new inhaler connector RTC 24-V. This was compared with the existing 22M-22F connector in a comparative study. The dose counter of Seretide™ recorded prior to initiation and extubation showed an obvious drop in doses ranging from 15 to 63 in patients randomized to use RTC 24-V, compared to 0 to 2 drop in doses for patients using 22M-22F. A total of 51 pre study and 33 post study questionnaires were completed. Confidence that the accurate dose of medications was administered rose from 58.8% to 84.8% after using the RTC 24-V. Responses that there was no issue compromising patient safety rose from 0% to 51.5% and fewer staff expressed concern about disconnections causing infections, dropping from 51% to 9.1%. 93.9% of respondents chose the new RTC 24-V as the preferred inhaler connector. The new inhaler connector RTC 24-V was assessed to have less medication errors. ICU healthcare professionals expressed greater confidence in its safety and accuracy. We will implement the use of this connector with continued medical education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善重症监护室吸入器配送的质量改进项目
2022 年末,一名重症监护室护士发现,常用吸入器 Seretide™(沙美特罗/氟替卡松)Evohaler 与吸入器连接器 22M-22F 一起使用时,其剂量计数器不会发生变化。这被认为是一个用药安全问题。此外,还发现了机械通气患者使用吸入器方面的知识缺口。为了有效地为通气患者使用计量吸入器,并提高其准确性和安全性。我们为重症监护室的医护人员制定了教育计划,并引进了新型吸入器连接器 RTC 24-V。在一项比较研究中,我们将其与现有的 22M-22F 连接器进行了比较。在开始使用和拔管前记录的塞瑞泰™剂量计数器显示,随机使用 RTC 24-V 的患者剂量明显下降了 15 至 63 个剂量不等,而使用 22M-22F 的患者剂量下降了 0 至 2 个剂量不等。共完成了 51 份研究前调查问卷和 33 份研究后调查问卷。使用 RTC 24-V 后,对准确用药剂量的信心从 58.8% 上升到 84.8%。认为不会影响患者安全的受访者从 0% 上升到 51.5%,对断开连接导致感染表示担忧的员工从 51% 下降到 9.1%。93.9% 的受访者选择新型 RTC 24-V 作为首选吸入器连接器。据评估,新型吸入器连接器 RTC 24-V 的用药错误率较低。重症监护室的医护人员对其安全性和准确性表示更有信心。我们将通过持续的医学教育来推广使用这种连接器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Caudal epidural, pericapsular nerve group block and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block in hip fracture surgery: A case report Assessment and evaluation of nutrition education among physicians in a tertiary paediatric specialist hospital: The need for improved clinical nutrition teaching Heat-related illness in Singapore: Descriptive analysis of a tertiary care center from 2008 to 2020 A review on cytomegalovirus in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: Prevalence, clinical spectrum, treatment, and antiviral prophylaxis Ophthalmic primary care in Singapore: Considerations for review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1