Pedagogical and Education-Related Measures suggested by the Algerian and British governments for the higher education sector during the COVID-19 pandemic – a comparative study

Tarek Assassi, Abdelhak Chenini
{"title":"Pedagogical and Education-Related Measures suggested by the Algerian and British governments for the higher education sector during the COVID-19 pandemic – a comparative study","authors":"Tarek Assassi, Abdelhak Chenini","doi":"10.7336/academicus.2024.29.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has had far-reaching effects, not only on public health but also on the global economy, social interactions, and daily life. It has highlighted the importance of global cooperation and the need for more investment in public health and emergency preparedness. The pandemic also exposed weaknesses in many countries’ educational management systems; it has forced many higher education institutions to adopt new teaching and learning methods to minimize the risk of transmission. This resulted in the need for comparative studies to evaluate the effectiveness of different pedagogical responses and to find common ground on the most effective practices and responses that would help higher education institutions better prepare for similar challenges in the future. The present study provides a comparative study and outcomes through a record of the pedagogical responses by higher education authorities in two completely different contexts (Algeria and the UK). The authors of the paper adopted a desktop analysis approach through valid and first-hand reliable sources like government and university official releases. This research methodology would involve a systematic and rigorous approach to data collection and analysis to ensure the reliability and validity of the research findings. Through coding and thematic analysis of the collected data, the researchers concluded that the efficiency of the responses and decisions adopted by higher education institutions varied depending on a range of factors such as the institution’s resources, infrastructure, and student population. However, the pandemic highlighted the need for agile and serious responses to ensure the safety and well-being of students and the campus community.","PeriodicalId":516189,"journal":{"name":"Academicus International Scientific Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academicus International Scientific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2024.29.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had far-reaching effects, not only on public health but also on the global economy, social interactions, and daily life. It has highlighted the importance of global cooperation and the need for more investment in public health and emergency preparedness. The pandemic also exposed weaknesses in many countries’ educational management systems; it has forced many higher education institutions to adopt new teaching and learning methods to minimize the risk of transmission. This resulted in the need for comparative studies to evaluate the effectiveness of different pedagogical responses and to find common ground on the most effective practices and responses that would help higher education institutions better prepare for similar challenges in the future. The present study provides a comparative study and outcomes through a record of the pedagogical responses by higher education authorities in two completely different contexts (Algeria and the UK). The authors of the paper adopted a desktop analysis approach through valid and first-hand reliable sources like government and university official releases. This research methodology would involve a systematic and rigorous approach to data collection and analysis to ensure the reliability and validity of the research findings. Through coding and thematic analysis of the collected data, the researchers concluded that the efficiency of the responses and decisions adopted by higher education institutions varied depending on a range of factors such as the institution’s resources, infrastructure, and student population. However, the pandemic highlighted the need for agile and serious responses to ensure the safety and well-being of students and the campus community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔及利亚和英国政府在 COVID-19 大流行期间为高等教育部门建议的教学和教育相关措施 - 一项比较研究
COVID-19 大流行不仅对公共卫生,而且对全球经济、社会交往和日常生活都产生了深远的影响。它凸显了全球合作的重要性,以及在公共卫生和应急准备方面进行更多投资的必要性。大流行病还暴露了许多国家教育管理系统的薄弱环节;它迫使许多高等教育机构采用新的教学方法,以最大限度地降低传播风险。因此,有必要开展比较研究,以评估不同教学应对措施的有效性,并就最有效的做法和应对措施找到共同点,从而帮助高等教育机构更好地应对未来的类似挑战。本研究通过记录高等教育机构在两种完全不同的背景下(阿尔及利亚和英国)所采取的教学对策,提供了一项比较研究和成果。本文作者采用了桌面分析方法,通过有效的第一手可靠资料来源,如政府和大学的官方发布。这种研究方法涉及系统、严谨的数据收集和分析方法,以确保研究结果的可靠性和有效性。通过对收集到的数据进行编码和专题分析,研究人员得出结论,高等教育机构采取的应对措施和决策的效率因机构的资源、基础设施和学生人数等一系列因素而异。然而,大流行病凸显了采取灵活而严肃的应对措施的必要性,以确保学生和校园社区的安全和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The 2008 Law “On Gender Equality in Society” and Some of its Effects on Equal Representation. Speed, human reality, and the ribovirocell of human existence in the COVID19 and post-COVID19 space-time The regime of inequality affecting the Roma community in Albania Gender perspectives in the Italian Muslim family: Education, taboos, conflicts, and intergenerational transformations The Digital as Sacred Space: Exploring the Online Religious Dimension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1