Assessment of the value of 6-min walk test to predict the severity of interstitial lung disease among Indian patients

Anantha Krishna Sompalli, Sateesh Rao Kailasa, Varun Pulugundla, Naveen Chandra Reddy Kotha, Pawan Kumar Sharma, Gopala Krishnaiah Velisela, Mohammed Soheb Sadath Ansari
{"title":"Assessment of the value of 6-min walk test to predict the severity of interstitial lung disease among Indian patients","authors":"Anantha Krishna Sompalli, Sateesh Rao Kailasa, Varun Pulugundla, Naveen Chandra Reddy Kotha, Pawan Kumar Sharma, Gopala Krishnaiah Velisela, Mohammed Soheb Sadath Ansari","doi":"10.4103/jacp.jacp_54_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction: The prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is increasing. High-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT), despite having limitations, remains the choice of method for diagnosis and assessment of severity of ILD. Objective: To determine the efficacy of 6-min walk test to assess the severity of the ILD compared to HRCT. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was done among 40 patients with ILD in a tertiary hospital in Hyderabad. The data included age, gender, smoking, HRCT, 6-min walk test, spirometry, diffusion lung capacity and medical history. Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and ROC curve were used to determine the outcomes. Results: The mean age of participants was 57.18 + 13.01 years. 62.5% never smoked. Overall, 50% had severe ILD, and the rest had mild to moderate. The distance walked per 6-min, SpO2 before and SpO2 after, was significantly lower (p = 0.001; 0.002; <0.001, respectively) among patients with severe ILD than mild or moderate. The sensitivity and 1-specificity of the distance walked in 6-min to detect the severity of ILD was 0.90 and 0.31, respectively; sensitivity and 1-specificity of SpO2 before the test was 0.81 and 0.34, while that of SpO2 after the test was 0.90 and 0.17, respectively. Conclusion: This study found that the 6-min walk test is highly sensitive and specific for predicting the severity of ILD among patients. All three components of the 6-min walk test: distance, oxygen saturation before, and oxygen saturation after the test significantly lowered and were independent predictors of severe ILD.","PeriodicalId":30411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jacp.jacp_54_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is increasing. High-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT), despite having limitations, remains the choice of method for diagnosis and assessment of severity of ILD. Objective: To determine the efficacy of 6-min walk test to assess the severity of the ILD compared to HRCT. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was done among 40 patients with ILD in a tertiary hospital in Hyderabad. The data included age, gender, smoking, HRCT, 6-min walk test, spirometry, diffusion lung capacity and medical history. Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and ROC curve were used to determine the outcomes. Results: The mean age of participants was 57.18 + 13.01 years. 62.5% never smoked. Overall, 50% had severe ILD, and the rest had mild to moderate. The distance walked per 6-min, SpO2 before and SpO2 after, was significantly lower (p = 0.001; 0.002; <0.001, respectively) among patients with severe ILD than mild or moderate. The sensitivity and 1-specificity of the distance walked in 6-min to detect the severity of ILD was 0.90 and 0.31, respectively; sensitivity and 1-specificity of SpO2 before the test was 0.81 and 0.34, while that of SpO2 after the test was 0.90 and 0.17, respectively. Conclusion: This study found that the 6-min walk test is highly sensitive and specific for predicting the severity of ILD among patients. All three components of the 6-min walk test: distance, oxygen saturation before, and oxygen saturation after the test significantly lowered and were independent predictors of severe ILD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 6 分钟步行测试对预测印度患者间质性肺病严重程度的价值
简介间质性肺病(ILD)的发病率正在上升。高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)虽然有其局限性,但仍是诊断和评估间质性肺病严重程度的首选方法。研究目的确定 6 分钟步行测试与 HRCT 相比在评估 ILD 严重程度方面的有效性。方法:横断面研究在海得拉巴的一家三级医院对 40 名 ILD 患者进行了横断面研究。数据包括年龄、性别、吸烟、HRCT、6 分钟步行测试、肺活量测定、肺弥散容量和病史。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验、Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 ROC 曲线确定结果。结果显示参与者的平均年龄为 57.18 + 13.01 岁。62.5%的人从不吸烟。总体而言,50%的人患有重度 ILD,其余为轻度至中度。重度 ILD 患者每 6 分钟的步行距离、步行前的 SpO2 和步行后的 SpO2 均显著低于轻度或中度患者(分别为 p = 0.001;0.002;<0.001)。6 分钟步行距离检测 ILD 严重程度的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.90 和 0.31;检测前 SpO2 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.81 和 0.34,而检测后 SpO2 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.90 和 0.17。结论本研究发现,6 分钟步行测试对预测 ILD 患者的严重程度具有高度敏感性和特异性。6 分钟步行测试的三个组成部分:距离、测试前的血氧饱和度和测试后的血氧饱和度均显著降低,是严重 ILD 的独立预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis with prognostic risk factors: A study in the hilly state of North India A radiolucent cystic lesion in a chest radiograph of a breathless child − a case report Persistent residual lung abnormalities as final outcome in recovered severe COVID-19 pneumonia with lung function abnormalities in spirometry: Pulmonologist and radiologist perspective Wegener’s granulomatosis versus pulmonary tuberculosis: a dilemma Carcinoid tumorlet/typical carcinoid of the lung: An incidental bronchoscopic finding and cytological dilemma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1