Rimegepant as an acute treatment in a refractory migraine patient non-responder to two anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and triptans: Case report and pharmacological considerations

Q3 Medicine Cephalalgia Reports Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25158163241235130
Andrea Burgalassi, Giulia Vigani, Alberto Boccalini, F. De Cesaris, Guido Mannaioni, Alberto Chiarugi, Pierangelo Geppetti, L. Iannone
{"title":"Rimegepant as an acute treatment in a refractory migraine patient non-responder to two anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and triptans: Case report and pharmacological considerations","authors":"Andrea Burgalassi, Giulia Vigani, Alberto Boccalini, F. De Cesaris, Guido Mannaioni, Alberto Chiarugi, Pierangelo Geppetti, L. Iannone","doi":"10.1177/25158163241235130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small molecule receptor antagonists (gepants), or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) have recently become available for migraine prophylaxis and/or acute treatment. Considering their shared mechanisms of action, if the failure to an anti-CGRP(R) mAbs preclude the effectiveness of gepants or vice versa is still unknown. Herein, we report the first case of a patient with refractory migraine responsive to the acute use of rimegepant that previously failed two different anti-CGRP(R) mAbs and with no response to other acute treatments. Finally, we performed a literature review on the use of gepants in patients that failed other anti-CGRP and/or triptans. A 56-year-old female with a long history of chronic migraine without aura, fulfilling the EHF definition for a diagnosis of refractory migraine. Overall, the patient treated five not-consecutive migraine attacks. All of them were treated according to the predefined criteria. The mean (±SD) NRS before rimegepant assumption was 7.8 ± 0.9, all attacks cause at least severe impairment at onset, and no rescue medications were used. Pain free at 2 hours was achieved in three out of five attacks (60.0%), with no recurrence of migraine in the following 24 hours. The patient reported also a sustained benefit the day after the drug assumption. The response pain free was achieved after a mean time of 13.3 ± 4.5 minutes considering only attacks successfully treated (three out of five attacks). No adverse events were reported. In conclusion, rimegepant for acute treatment may be a viable option in patients with partial or no response to triptans that failed preventive treatments targeting the CGRP pathway, regardless to ligand or receptor. The failure of anti-CGRP(R) mAbs does not necessarily preclude the use of gepants (acute and/or preventive), but further studies are urgently needed to provide evidence on the efficacy of these treatments in managing drug-resistant migraine and to identify novel treatments for patients.","PeriodicalId":9702,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia Reports","volume":"92 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158163241235130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Small molecule receptor antagonists (gepants), or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) have recently become available for migraine prophylaxis and/or acute treatment. Considering their shared mechanisms of action, if the failure to an anti-CGRP(R) mAbs preclude the effectiveness of gepants or vice versa is still unknown. Herein, we report the first case of a patient with refractory migraine responsive to the acute use of rimegepant that previously failed two different anti-CGRP(R) mAbs and with no response to other acute treatments. Finally, we performed a literature review on the use of gepants in patients that failed other anti-CGRP and/or triptans. A 56-year-old female with a long history of chronic migraine without aura, fulfilling the EHF definition for a diagnosis of refractory migraine. Overall, the patient treated five not-consecutive migraine attacks. All of them were treated according to the predefined criteria. The mean (±SD) NRS before rimegepant assumption was 7.8 ± 0.9, all attacks cause at least severe impairment at onset, and no rescue medications were used. Pain free at 2 hours was achieved in three out of five attacks (60.0%), with no recurrence of migraine in the following 24 hours. The patient reported also a sustained benefit the day after the drug assumption. The response pain free was achieved after a mean time of 13.3 ± 4.5 minutes considering only attacks successfully treated (three out of five attacks). No adverse events were reported. In conclusion, rimegepant for acute treatment may be a viable option in patients with partial or no response to triptans that failed preventive treatments targeting the CGRP pathway, regardless to ligand or receptor. The failure of anti-CGRP(R) mAbs does not necessarily preclude the use of gepants (acute and/or preventive), but further studies are urgently needed to provide evidence on the efficacy of these treatments in managing drug-resistant migraine and to identify novel treatments for patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rimegepant 作为一种急性疗法,用于治疗对两种抗 CGRP 单克隆抗体和曲坦类药物无效的难治性偏头痛患者:病例报告和药理学考虑
针对降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)的小分子受体拮抗剂(gepants)或单克隆抗体(mAbs)最近已可用于偏头痛的预防和/或急性治疗。考虑到它们的共同作用机制,抗降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体(mAbs)是否会导致降钙素基因相关肽类药物失效或反之亦然仍是未知数。在此,我们报告了第一例对利美喷剂急性用药有反应的难治性偏头痛患者,该患者曾对两种不同的抗 CGRP(R) mAbs 药物治疗失败,且对其他急性治疗无反应。最后,我们对其他抗CGRP和/或三苯氧胺类药物治疗失败的患者使用格潘的文献进行了回顾。一位 56 岁的女性患者长期患有慢性无先兆偏头痛,符合 EHF 诊断难治性偏头痛的定义。患者共治疗了五次不连续的偏头痛发作。所有发作均按照预定标准进行了治疗。服用利美昔班前的平均(±SD)NRS为7.8±0.9,所有发作至少在发病时造成严重损害,且未使用任何抢救药物。在五次发作中,有三次(60.0%)在两小时内无疼痛感,在随后的24小时内偏头痛没有复发。患者还报告说,在服药后的第二天仍能持续获益。平均用药时间为(13.3 ± 4.5)分钟,仅成功治疗了一次偏头痛发作(五次发作中的三次)。无不良反应报告。总之,对于三苯氧胺类药物治疗部分反应或无反应、针对 CGRP 通路的预防性治疗失败的患者,无论其配体或受体如何,利美昔班都是一种可行的急性治疗选择。抗CGRP(R) mAbs的失败并不一定排除使用gepants(急性和/或预防性)的可能性,但迫切需要进一步的研究来证明这些疗法在治疗耐药偏头痛方面的疗效,并为患者确定新的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia Reports
Cephalalgia Reports Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Protocol of a cross-sectional, multicentre and multidisciplinary study describing phenotype and burden of a midfacial segment pain Paranoid psychosis after a single parenteral dose of indomethacin administered for headache diagnosis: A case and review of the literature Extended regular use of kinetic oscillation stimulation (KOS) in refractory chronic migraine: case report of a first, single-subject experience Corrigendum to “Eptinezumab administered intravenously, subcutaneously, or intramuscularly in healthy subjects and/or patients with migraine: Early development studies” A century of bruxism research in top-ranking medical journals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1