下载PDF
{"title":"Assessment of the impact of telehealth intervention in patients with bone and joint infection","authors":"Philippine Marque , Julie Leitao , Fréderic-Antoine Dauchy , Olivier Gerbouin , Thierry Fabre , Fabien Xuereb , Marin Lahouati","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Patients with bone and joint infections (BJI) are involved in a complex care pathway and require prolonged antimicrobial treatment. Some studies have suggested that a pharmacist-led telehealth intervention (TI) could help to ensure better follow-up of chronic diseases. To our knowledge, there are no data on the effects of pharmacist-led TI on patients with BJI. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a TI on patients treated for BJIs at three weeks after hospital discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Patients encountered during hospitalization and receiving standardized care including TI were included in the study. All adverse events (AE) reported by patients during TI were evaluated. Impact of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) provided by a clinical pharmacist following TI was evaluated by CLEO© (CLinical, Economic and Organizational) scale. Patient satisfaction concerning TI was assessed by an anonymous questionnaire following medical consultation at the end of antimicrobial treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over a 4-month period, 36 patients received TI. Fifty-two AEs were identified in 21 patients (58%). Two patients were hospitalized due to an AE. Clinical pharmacists provided 34 pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) for 23 patients (64%). According to CLEO scale, 11 PIs had a major clinical impact (32%), 6 PIs (18%) had a favorable impact on the direct cost of treatment and 27 PIs (79%) had positive organizational impact. Concerning TI process, patients were satisfied or very satisfied, with an average score of 9.6/10.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TI led to a high number of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs), with a meaningful clinical, organizational, and economic impact. Patients were also highly satisfied with this intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":"54 4","pages":"Article 104906"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000617/pdfft?md5=8bb52774d90244caa5488f212079ba91&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924000617-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Objectives Patients with bone and joint infections (BJI) are involved in a complex care pathway and require prolonged antimicrobial treatment. Some studies have suggested that a pharmacist-led telehealth intervention (TI) could help to ensure better follow-up of chronic diseases. To our knowledge, there are no data on the effects of pharmacist-led TI on patients with BJI. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a TI on patients treated for BJIs at three weeks after hospital discharge.
Patients and Methods Patients encountered during hospitalization and receiving standardized care including TI were included in the study. All adverse events (AE) reported by patients during TI were evaluated. Impact of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) provided by a clinical pharmacist following TI was evaluated by CLEO© (CLinical, Economic and Organizational) scale. Patient satisfaction concerning TI was assessed by an anonymous questionnaire following medical consultation at the end of antimicrobial treatment.
Results Over a 4-month period, 36 patients received TI. Fifty-two AEs were identified in 21 patients (58%). Two patients were hospitalized due to an AE. Clinical pharmacists provided 34 pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) for 23 patients (64%). According to CLEO scale, 11 PIs had a major clinical impact (32%), 6 PIs (18%) had a favorable impact on the direct cost of treatment and 27 PIs (79%) had positive organizational impact. Concerning TI process, patients were satisfied or very satisfied, with an average score of 9.6/10.
Conclusion TI led to a high number of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs), with a meaningful clinical, organizational, and economic impact. Patients were also highly satisfied with this intervention.
评估远程医疗干预对骨与关节感染患者的影响
目的:骨与关节感染(BJI)患者的护理路径复杂,需要长时间的抗菌治疗。一些研究表明,由药剂师主导的远程医疗干预(TI)有助于确保对慢性疾病进行更好的随访。据我们所知,目前还没有关于药剂师主导的远程医疗干预对北京和睦家医院患者的影响的数据。本研究的目的是评估出院后三周内,TI 对接受北京和睦家医院治疗的患者的影响。评估了患者在TI期间报告的所有不良事件(AE)。采用 CLEO©(临床、经济和组织)量表对临床药剂师在 TI 后提供的药物干预(PIs)的影响进行评估。在抗菌药物治疗结束后的医疗咨询中,通过匿名问卷对患者对 TI 的满意度进行了评估。在 21 名患者(58%)中发现了 52 种不良反应。两名患者因AE住院。临床药剂师为 23 名患者(64%)提供了 34 次药物干预 (PI)。根据 CLEO 量表,11 项 PI(32%)对临床产生了重大影响,6 项 PI(18%)对直接治疗成本产生了有利影响,27 项 PI(79%)对组织产生了积极影响。关于 TI 流程,患者表示满意或非常满意,平均得分为 9.6/10.ConclusionTI 带来了大量的药物干预(PIs),对临床、组织和经济产生了有意义的影响。患者对这一干预措施也非常满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。