Respiratory symptom perception during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.1016/j.resp.2024.104256
Josh T. Goh , Bryce N. Balmain , Andrew R. Tomlinson , James P. MacNamara , Satyam Sarma , Thomas Ritz , Denis J. Wakeham , Tiffany L. Brazile , Linda S. Hynan , Benjamin D. Levine , Tony G. Babb
{"title":"Respiratory symptom perception during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction","authors":"Josh T. Goh ,&nbsp;Bryce N. Balmain ,&nbsp;Andrew R. Tomlinson ,&nbsp;James P. MacNamara ,&nbsp;Satyam Sarma ,&nbsp;Thomas Ritz ,&nbsp;Denis J. Wakeham ,&nbsp;Tiffany L. Brazile ,&nbsp;Linda S. Hynan ,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Levine ,&nbsp;Tony G. Babb","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigated whether central or peripheral limitations to oxygen uptake elicit different respiratory sensations and whether dyspnea on exertion (DOE) provokes unpleasantness and negative emotions in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). 48 patients were categorized based on their cardiac output (Q̇c)/oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>) slope and stroke volume (SV) reserve during an incremental cycling test. 15 were classified as centrally limited and 33 were classified as peripherally limited. Ratings of perceived breathlessness (RPB) and unpleasantness (RPU) were assessed (Borg 0–10 scale) during a 20 W cycling test. 15 respiratory sensations statements (1–10 scale) and 5 negative emotions statements (1−10) were subsequently rated. RPB (Central: 3.5±2.0 vs. Peripheral: 3.4±2.0, p=0.86), respiratory sensations, or negative emotions were not different between groups (p&gt;0.05). RPB correlated (p&lt;0.05) with RPU (r=0.925), “anxious” (r=0.610), and “afraid” (r=0.383). While DOE provokes elevated levels of negative emotions, DOE and respiratory sensations seem more related to a common mechanism rather than central and/or peripheral limitations in HFpEF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824000491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated whether central or peripheral limitations to oxygen uptake elicit different respiratory sensations and whether dyspnea on exertion (DOE) provokes unpleasantness and negative emotions in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). 48 patients were categorized based on their cardiac output (Q̇c)/oxygen uptake (V̇O2) slope and stroke volume (SV) reserve during an incremental cycling test. 15 were classified as centrally limited and 33 were classified as peripherally limited. Ratings of perceived breathlessness (RPB) and unpleasantness (RPU) were assessed (Borg 0–10 scale) during a 20 W cycling test. 15 respiratory sensations statements (1–10 scale) and 5 negative emotions statements (1−10) were subsequently rated. RPB (Central: 3.5±2.0 vs. Peripheral: 3.4±2.0, p=0.86), respiratory sensations, or negative emotions were not different between groups (p>0.05). RPB correlated (p<0.05) with RPU (r=0.925), “anxious” (r=0.610), and “afraid” (r=0.383). While DOE provokes elevated levels of negative emotions, DOE and respiratory sensations seem more related to a common mechanism rather than central and/or peripheral limitations in HFpEF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者运动时的呼吸症状感知
我们研究了在射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者中,中枢或外周对摄氧的限制是否会引起不同的呼吸感觉,以及用力时呼吸困难(DOE)是否会引起不愉快和负面情绪。根据增量骑车测试中的心输出量(Q.̇c)/吸氧量(V.̇O2)斜率和每搏容量(SV)储备对 48 名患者进行了分类。15 人被归类为中枢受限,33 人被归类为外周受限。在 20 W 自行车测试中,对呼吸困难感(RPB)和不愉快感(RPU)进行了评估(博格 0-10 级评分)。随后对 15 项呼吸感觉陈述(1-10 分制)和 5 项负面情绪陈述(1-10 分制)进行评分。RPB(中枢:3.5±2.0 vs. 外周:3.4±2.0,p=0.86)、呼吸感觉或负面情绪在组间无差异(p>0.05)。RPB 与 RPU(r=0.925)、"焦虑"(r=0.610)和 "害怕"(r=0.383)相关(p<0.05)。虽然 DOE 会引发负面情绪水平的升高,但 DOE 和呼吸感觉似乎更多地与一种共同机制有关,而非高频心衰患者的中枢和/或外周限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense. Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as: -Mechanics of breathing- Gas exchange and acid-base balance- Respiration at rest and exercise- Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen- Embryonic and adult respiration- Comparative respiratory physiology. Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.
期刊最新文献
Endomorphin-2 (Endo2) and substance P (SubP) co-application attenuates SubP-induced excitation and alters frequency plasticity in neonatal rat in vitro preparations Lateral hypothalamic astrocytes contribute to the hypercapnic chemoreflex in a light-dark cycle-dependent manner in unanesthetized rats The acute effect of respiratory muscle training on cortisol, testosterone, and testosterone-to-cortisol ratio in well-trained triathletes - exploratory study Ticagrelor-related dyspnea beyond adenosine: Insights into retrotrapezoid hyperactivity 4-Hydroxychalcone attenuates ovalbumin-induced allergic airway inflammation and oxidative stress by activating Nrf2/GPx4 pathway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1