Narrative R&D disclosure and insider trading profitability: Evidence from China

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting and Public Policy Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107210
Wan Huang , Qingwen Liang
{"title":"Narrative R&D disclosure and insider trading profitability: Evidence from China","authors":"Wan Huang ,&nbsp;Qingwen Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates how narrative R&amp;D disclosures affect firms’ information asymmetry from the perspective of insider trading profitability. Inconsistent with the traditional information economics theory that information disclosure can alleviate information asymmetry, we find robust evidence that insiders in firms with more narrative R&amp;D disclosures gain significantly greater returns from their stock selling, but this positive relation is attenuated when the readability of R&amp;D-related texts is higher. We examine two potential channels through which more narrative R&amp;D disclosures increase information asymmetry, thus creating opportunities for insiders to trade profitably. One is managers’ obfuscation disclosure of narrative R&amp;D information due to proprietary costs, and the other is the high information processing costs associated with the technical nature of R&amp;D information. We also find that good corporate governance mechanisms can weaken the positive association between narrative R&amp;D disclosure and insider trading profitability. In further analysis, we provide evidence that more narrative R&amp;D disclosures indeed exert high information processing costs for investors and provide opportunities for insiders to trade more before bad news arrives. Overall, our research sheds light on the dark side of narrative R&amp;D disclosure on firms’ information environment from the perspective of insider trading.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 107210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425424000334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates how narrative R&D disclosures affect firms’ information asymmetry from the perspective of insider trading profitability. Inconsistent with the traditional information economics theory that information disclosure can alleviate information asymmetry, we find robust evidence that insiders in firms with more narrative R&D disclosures gain significantly greater returns from their stock selling, but this positive relation is attenuated when the readability of R&D-related texts is higher. We examine two potential channels through which more narrative R&D disclosures increase information asymmetry, thus creating opportunities for insiders to trade profitably. One is managers’ obfuscation disclosure of narrative R&D information due to proprietary costs, and the other is the high information processing costs associated with the technical nature of R&D information. We also find that good corporate governance mechanisms can weaken the positive association between narrative R&D disclosure and insider trading profitability. In further analysis, we provide evidence that more narrative R&D disclosures indeed exert high information processing costs for investors and provide opportunities for insiders to trade more before bad news arrives. Overall, our research sheds light on the dark side of narrative R&D disclosure on firms’ information environment from the perspective of insider trading.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研发信息披露与内幕交易盈利能力:来自中国的证据
本文从内幕交易收益率的角度研究了叙述性 R&D 信息披露如何影响公司的信息不对称。与信息披露可以缓解信息不对称的传统信息经济学理论不同,我们发现有力的证据表明,在 R&D 信息披露叙述性较强的公司中,内部人通过出售股票获得的收益明显更高,但当 R&D 相关文本的可读性较高时,这种正相关关系就会减弱。我们研究了两个潜在的渠道,通过这两个渠道,更多的 R&D 信息披露可能会增加信息不对称,从而为内部人创造交易获利的机会。其一是管理者出于专有成本的考虑而模糊披露 R&D 信息,其二是 R&D 信息的技术性所带来的高信息处理成本。我们还发现,良好的公司治理机制会削弱 R&D 信息披露与内幕交易盈利之间的正相关关系。在进一步分析中,我们提供的证据表明,更多的 R&D 信息披露确实会给投资者带来高昂的信息处理成本,并为内部人士在坏消息到来之前进行更多交易提供了机会。总之,我们的研究从内幕交易的角度揭示了 R&D 信息披露对公司信息环境的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy publishes research papers focusing on the intersection between accounting and public policy. Preference is given to papers illuminating through theoretical or empirical analysis, the effects of accounting on public policy and vice-versa. Subjects treated in this journal include the interface of accounting with economics, political science, sociology, or law. The Journal includes a section entitled Accounting Letters. This section publishes short research articles that should not exceed approximately 3,000 words. The objective of this section is to facilitate the rapid dissemination of important accounting research. Accordingly, articles submitted to this section will be reviewed within fours weeks of receipt, revisions will be limited to one, and publication will occur within four months of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Blockchain adoption and corporate financial reporting quality Crowding-out or Calling-out? The influence of mandatory industry-related firm-specific information disclosure on analyst reports Editorial Board Attention to corporate disclosure and earnings Management: Evidence from downloads of SEC filings Consolidation in national accounts: Implications for municipal enterprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1