Association of Three Novel Inflammatory Markers: Lymphocyte to HDL-C Ratio, High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein to HDL-C Ratio and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein to Lymphocyte Ratio With Metabolic Syndrome

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1002/edm2.479
Rana Kolahi Ahari, Nazanin Akbari, Negin Babaeepoor, Zahra Fallahi, Sara Saffar Soflaei, Gordon Ferns, Mahmoud Ebrahimi, Mohsen Moohebati, Habibollah Esmaily, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan
{"title":"Association of Three Novel Inflammatory Markers: Lymphocyte to HDL-C Ratio, High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein to HDL-C Ratio and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein to Lymphocyte Ratio With Metabolic Syndrome","authors":"Rana Kolahi Ahari,&nbsp;Nazanin Akbari,&nbsp;Negin Babaeepoor,&nbsp;Zahra Fallahi,&nbsp;Sara Saffar Soflaei,&nbsp;Gordon Ferns,&nbsp;Mahmoud Ebrahimi,&nbsp;Mohsen Moohebati,&nbsp;Habibollah Esmaily,&nbsp;Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan","doi":"10.1002/edm2.479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to compare the association of three novel inflammatory indicators with metabolic syndrome (MetS) among Mashhad stroke and heart atherosclerotic disorder (MASHAD) cohort participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, the cohort participants were divided into the MetS(+) and MetS(−) groups. The lymphocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (LHR), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) to HDL-C ratio (HCHR) and hs-CRP to lymphocyte ratio (HCLR) were calculated and were compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression (LR) analysis was performed to find the association of the indices with the presence of MetS among men and women. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to establish cut-off values in predicting MetS for men and women. <i>p</i>-Values &lt;0.05 were considered as statistically significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among a total of 8890 participants (5500 MetS(−) and 3390 MetS(+)), LHR, HCHR and HCLR were significantly higher in the MetS(+) group than in MetS(−) group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In LR analysis, after adjusting for multiple cofounders, LHR remained an independent factor for the presence of MetS among men (OR: 1.254; 95% CI: 1.202–1.308; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and women (OR: 1.393; 95% CI: 1.340–1.448; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). HCHR also remained an independent factor for the presence of MetS only in women (OR: 1.058; 95% CI: 1.043–1.073; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that LHR had the higher AUC for predicting MetS in both men (AUC: 0.627; 95% CI: 0.611–0.643; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and women (AUC: 0.683; 95% CI: 0.670, 0.696; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This suggests that among both genders, the LHR as an inexpensive and easy-to-access marker has a better diagnostic performance and could be a promising alternative to the traditional expensive inflammatory markers such as hs-CRP for the evaluation of inflammation in patients with MetS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.479","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to compare the association of three novel inflammatory indicators with metabolic syndrome (MetS) among Mashhad stroke and heart atherosclerotic disorder (MASHAD) cohort participants.

Methods

According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, the cohort participants were divided into the MetS(+) and MetS(−) groups. The lymphocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (LHR), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) to HDL-C ratio (HCHR) and hs-CRP to lymphocyte ratio (HCLR) were calculated and were compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression (LR) analysis was performed to find the association of the indices with the presence of MetS among men and women. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to establish cut-off values in predicting MetS for men and women. p-Values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

Among a total of 8890 participants (5500 MetS(−) and 3390 MetS(+)), LHR, HCHR and HCLR were significantly higher in the MetS(+) group than in MetS(−) group (p < 0.001). In LR analysis, after adjusting for multiple cofounders, LHR remained an independent factor for the presence of MetS among men (OR: 1.254; 95% CI: 1.202–1.308; p < 0.001) and women (OR: 1.393; 95% CI: 1.340–1.448; p < 0.001). HCHR also remained an independent factor for the presence of MetS only in women (OR: 1.058; 95% CI: 1.043–1.073; p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that LHR had the higher AUC for predicting MetS in both men (AUC: 0.627; 95% CI: 0.611–0.643; p < 0.001) and women (AUC: 0.683; 95% CI: 0.670, 0.696; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This suggests that among both genders, the LHR as an inexpensive and easy-to-access marker has a better diagnostic performance and could be a promising alternative to the traditional expensive inflammatory markers such as hs-CRP for the evaluation of inflammation in patients with MetS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种新型炎症标记物的关系淋巴细胞与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比率、高敏 C 反应蛋白与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比率和高敏 C 反应蛋白与淋巴细胞比率与代谢综合征的关系
目的 我们旨在比较马什哈德中风和心脏动脉粥样硬化紊乱队列(MASHAD)参与者中三种新型炎症指标与代谢综合征(MetS)的关联。 方法 根据国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)的标准,将队列参与者分为 MetS(+)组和 MetS(-)组。计算淋巴细胞与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)的比值(LHR)、高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)与HDL-C的比值(HCHR)和hs-CRP与淋巴细胞的比值(HCLR),并进行组间比较。通过二元逻辑回归(LR)分析,找出这些指标与男性和女性 MetS 存在的关联。采用接收者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析来确定预测男性和女性 MetS 的临界值。 结果 在 8890 名参与者(5500 名 MetS(-)和 3390 名 MetS(+))中,MetS(+)组的 LHR、HCHR 和 HCLR 显著高于 MetS(-) 组(p <0.001)。在 LR 分析中,在调整了多个共因子后,LHR 仍然是男性(OR:1.254;95% CI:1.202-1.308;p <;0.001)和女性(OR:1.393;95% CI:1.340-1.448;p <;0.001)出现 MetS 的独立因素。HCHR 也仍然是仅女性出现 MetS 的独立因素(OR:1.058;95% CI:1.043-1.073;p <;0.001)。ROC 曲线分析显示,LHR 在男性(AUC:0.627;95% CI:0.611-0.643;p <;0.001)和女性(AUC:0.683;95% CI:0.670, 0.696;p <;0.001)中预测 MetS 的 AUC 较高。 结论 这表明,在男女两性中,LHR 作为一种廉价且易于获取的标记物,具有更好的诊断性能,可替代传统的昂贵炎症标记物(如 hs-CRP),用于评估 MetS 患者的炎症情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP): The Most Accurate Indicator of Overweight and Obesity Among Lipid Indices in Type 2 Diabetes—Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study The Causal Role of Thyroid Hormones in Bipolar Disorders: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study Trends and Disparities in Coronary Artery Disease and Obesity-Related Mortality in the United States From 1999–2022 Comparative Efficacy of Magnesium and Potassium Towards Cholesterol and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomised Single-Blinded Controlled Clinical Trial Cardio-Metabolic Risk Profile of Women With Endometriosis: A Population-Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1