Congenital anomalies during Covid-19: artifact of surveillance or a real TORCH?

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH European Journal of Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1007/s10654-024-01122-8
Nathalie Auger, Laura Arbour, Antoine Lewin, Émilie Brousseau, Jessica Healy-Profitós, Thuy Mai Luu
{"title":"Congenital anomalies during Covid-19: artifact of surveillance or a real TORCH?","authors":"Nathalie Auger, Laura Arbour, Antoine Lewin, Émilie Brousseau, Jessica Healy-Profitós, Thuy Mai Luu","doi":"10.1007/s10654-024-01122-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infections in the first trimester of pregnancy can be teratogenic, but the possibility that Covid-19 could lead to birth defects is unclear. We examined whether SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy or exposure to pandemic conditions were associated with the risk of congenital anomalies. We carried out a retrospective study of 420,222 neonates born in Quebec, Canada in two time periods: prepandemic (January 1, 2017 to March 12, 2020) vs. pandemic (March 13, 2020 to March 31, 2022). We classified pandemic births as early (first trimester completed before the pandemic) or late (first trimester during the pandemic), and identified patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections during pregnancy. We applied (1) adjusted log-binomial regression models to assess the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and congenital anomalies, and (2) autoregressive interrupted time series regression to analyze temporal trends in the monthly number of defects in all patients regardless of infection. In total, 29,263 newborns (7.0%) had a congenital anomaly. First trimester SARS-CoV-2 infections were not associated with a greater risk of birth defects compared with no infection (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.59–1.95). However, births during the late pandemic period were more likely to be diagnosed with congenital microcephaly compared with prepandemic births (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.21–1.71). Interrupted time series analysis confirmed that the frequency of microcephaly increased during the late pandemic period, whereas other anomalies did not. We conclude that Covid-19 is likely not teratogenic, but enhanced surveillance of anomalies among late pandemic births may have heightened the detection of infants with microcephaly.</p>","PeriodicalId":11907,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01122-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infections in the first trimester of pregnancy can be teratogenic, but the possibility that Covid-19 could lead to birth defects is unclear. We examined whether SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy or exposure to pandemic conditions were associated with the risk of congenital anomalies. We carried out a retrospective study of 420,222 neonates born in Quebec, Canada in two time periods: prepandemic (January 1, 2017 to March 12, 2020) vs. pandemic (March 13, 2020 to March 31, 2022). We classified pandemic births as early (first trimester completed before the pandemic) or late (first trimester during the pandemic), and identified patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections during pregnancy. We applied (1) adjusted log-binomial regression models to assess the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and congenital anomalies, and (2) autoregressive interrupted time series regression to analyze temporal trends in the monthly number of defects in all patients regardless of infection. In total, 29,263 newborns (7.0%) had a congenital anomaly. First trimester SARS-CoV-2 infections were not associated with a greater risk of birth defects compared with no infection (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.59–1.95). However, births during the late pandemic period were more likely to be diagnosed with congenital microcephaly compared with prepandemic births (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.21–1.71). Interrupted time series analysis confirmed that the frequency of microcephaly increased during the late pandemic period, whereas other anomalies did not. We conclude that Covid-19 is likely not teratogenic, but enhanced surveillance of anomalies among late pandemic births may have heightened the detection of infants with microcephaly.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19 期间的先天性畸形:监视的假象还是真正的 TORCH?
妊娠头三个月的感染可能会致畸,但Covid-19导致出生缺陷的可能性尚不清楚。我们研究了孕期感染 SARS-CoV-2 或接触大流行病是否与先天性畸形的风险有关。我们对加拿大魁北克省出生的 420,222 名新生儿进行了回顾性研究,研究分为两个时间段:大流行前(2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 12 日)与大流行期间(2020 年 3 月 13 日至 2022 年 3 月 31 日)。我们将大流行期间的新生儿分为早期(大流行前三个月)和晚期(大流行期间的前三个月),并确定了孕期感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者。我们采用(1)调整对数二项式回归模型来评估 SARS-CoV-2 感染与先天性畸形之间的关联,以及(2)自回归间断时间序列回归来分析所有患者(无论感染与否)每月缺陷数量的时间趋势。共有 29,263 名新生儿(7.0%)患有先天性畸形。与未感染相比,头三个月感染 SARS-CoV-2 与出生缺陷的更大风险无关(RR 1.07,95% CI 0.59-1.95)。然而,与大流行前的新生儿相比,大流行后期的新生儿更有可能被诊断为先天性小头畸形(RR 1.44,95% CI 1.21-1.71)。间断时间序列分析证实,在大流行后期,小头畸形的发病率有所上升,而其他畸形的发病率则没有上升。我们的结论是,Covid-19 很可能不会致畸,但加强对大流行后期出生婴儿异常情况的监测可能会提高小头畸形婴儿的检出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Epidemiology
European Journal of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
1.50%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Epidemiology, established in 1985, is a peer-reviewed publication that provides a platform for discussions on epidemiology in its broadest sense. It covers various aspects of epidemiologic research and statistical methods. The journal facilitates communication between researchers, educators, and practitioners in epidemiology, including those in clinical and community medicine. Contributions from diverse fields such as public health, preventive medicine, clinical medicine, health economics, and computational biology and data science, in relation to health and disease, are encouraged. While accepting submissions from all over the world, the journal particularly emphasizes European topics relevant to epidemiology. The published articles consist of empirical research findings, developments in methodology, and opinion pieces.
期刊最新文献
Risks and rates, and the mathematical link between them Cohort profile: the provincial opioid agonist treatment cohort in Ontario, Canada Associations of Global Burden of Diseases study-derived dietary scores with mortality and chronic disease risk: a comprehensive analysis from the prospective NutriNet-Santé study The associations of long-term physical activity in adulthood with later biological ageing and all-cause mortality – a prospective twin study Association between preconception and early pregnancy exposure to fine particulate matter and nervous system anomalies: a nested case-control study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1