Older people's experiences of hospitalization for surgical intervention for hip fracture: A systematic review

Zexuan Liu , Zhenlan Xia , Yuanfang Kuang , Beibei Liu
{"title":"Older people's experiences of hospitalization for surgical intervention for hip fracture: A systematic review","authors":"Zexuan Liu ,&nbsp;Zhenlan Xia ,&nbsp;Yuanfang Kuang ,&nbsp;Beibei Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2024.101096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hip fracture always requires hospitalization with high cost, which cause the complicated experiences and feelings.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To inform pre- and in-hospital communication practices between healthcare professionals and patients through a systematic review and qualitative research that synthesizes the experiences and feelings of older patients with hip fracture during the perioperative period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and three Chinese databases for relevant studies. Qualitative studies were included if they were related to the experiences and needs of hospitalization of older patients with hip fracture. Study quality was evaluated using the 2016 Joanna Briggs Institute quality evaluation criteria for qualitative research, and the results were consolidated using an thematic synthesis approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen studies were included in our meta-synthesis. We extracted 58 clear research topics. Eight new categories were formed after induction and integration, which were finally merged into three integrated results. Integration result 1: Patients suffered a large amount of physical and psychological trauma. Integration result 2: A balance of proper protection and independence for patients is required. Integration result 3: Adequate pre-discharge preparation is required.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our review suggests that healthcare professionals should reduce pain catastrophizing and the fear of falling after surgery among older people with hip fracture. Furthermore, adequate pre-discharge preparation should be made jointly with patients. Meeting patients’ diverse needs by various methods will promote active and healthy aging.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124124000169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hip fracture always requires hospitalization with high cost, which cause the complicated experiences and feelings.

Objective

To inform pre- and in-hospital communication practices between healthcare professionals and patients through a systematic review and qualitative research that synthesizes the experiences and feelings of older patients with hip fracture during the perioperative period.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and three Chinese databases for relevant studies. Qualitative studies were included if they were related to the experiences and needs of hospitalization of older patients with hip fracture. Study quality was evaluated using the 2016 Joanna Briggs Institute quality evaluation criteria for qualitative research, and the results were consolidated using an thematic synthesis approach.

Results

Sixteen studies were included in our meta-synthesis. We extracted 58 clear research topics. Eight new categories were formed after induction and integration, which were finally merged into three integrated results. Integration result 1: Patients suffered a large amount of physical and psychological trauma. Integration result 2: A balance of proper protection and independence for patients is required. Integration result 3: Adequate pre-discharge preparation is required.

Conclusions

Our review suggests that healthcare professionals should reduce pain catastrophizing and the fear of falling after surgery among older people with hip fracture. Furthermore, adequate pre-discharge preparation should be made jointly with patients. Meeting patients’ diverse needs by various methods will promote active and healthy aging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人因髋部骨折住院接受手术治疗的经历:系统回顾
背景髋部骨折总是需要住院治疗,费用高昂,导致患者的经历和感受复杂。目的通过系统综述和定性研究,综合老年髋部骨折患者在围手术期的经历和感受,为医护人员和患者之间的院前和院内沟通实践提供参考。方法我们检索了 Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL 和三个中文数据库中的相关研究。与老年髋部骨折患者住院期间的经历和需求相关的定性研究均被纳入。研究质量采用 2016 年乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)定性研究质量评估标准进行评估,并采用专题综合法对结果进行整合。我们提取了 58 个明确的研究主题。经过归纳和整合,形成了 8 个新的类别,最后合并为 3 项整合成果。整合结果 1:患者遭受了巨大的身心创伤。整合结果 2:需要兼顾对患者的适当保护和独立。结论我们的研究表明,医护人员应减少髋部骨折老年人术后的疼痛灾难化和跌倒恐惧。此外,应与患者共同做好充分的出院前准备。通过各种方法满足患者的不同需求将促进积极健康的老年生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of older adults: The difficulties and needs of returning home after hip fractures Efficacy of vitamin C supplementation in preventing and treating complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) in Orthopedic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Improving external fixator pin site care through user involvement: A quality improvement project Psychometric properties of Japanese version15D and cultural characteristics of quality of life undergoing patients with hip and knee arthroplasty The relationship of pain catastrophizing in principal caregivers of postoperative children with malignant bone tumors and children's kinesiophobia and pain perception: A cross-sectional survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1