Clinical Significance Thresholds in Primary and Revision Latarjet Procedures With Comparable Outcome Achievements

Ignacio Pasqualini, Ignacio Tanoira, Eoghan T. Hurley, Maximiliano Ranalletta, Luciano Andrés Rossi
{"title":"Clinical Significance Thresholds in Primary and Revision Latarjet Procedures With Comparable Outcome Achievements","authors":"Ignacio Pasqualini, Ignacio Tanoira, Eoghan T. Hurley, Maximiliano Ranalletta, Luciano Andrés Rossi","doi":"10.1177/03635465241241538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Given the variability across populations and settings, defining the MCID and the PASS for the Rowe and ASOSS scores and patients undergoing primary and revision Latarjet it is essential to have accurate benchmarks relevant to these groups when interpreting clinical results.Purpose:To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain during sports, Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS), and Rowe scores after primary and revision Latarjet procedures for treatment of shoulder instability.Study Design:Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Between January 2018 and January 2020, a retrospective review of 149 patients undergoing primary Latarjet (n = 82) and revision Latarjet (n = 67) to treat shoulder instability was performed in a single institution. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The delta was defined as the change between the pre- and postoperative scores. Distribution-based and anchored-based approaches were used to estimate the MCID and the PASS, respectively. The optimal cutoff point and the percentage of patients achieving those thresholds were also calculated.Results:The distribution-based MCIDs after primary Latarjet were 1.1, 7.5, and 9.6 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved the MCID thresholds were 93.9%, 98.7%, and 100% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The PASS thresholds after primary Latarjet were ≤1, ≥90, and ≥85 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The percentages of patients who achieved PASS thresholds were 82.9%, 89%, and 86.5% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The distribution-based MCIDs after revision Latarjet were 0.6, 6.2, and 3.4 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved MCID thresholds were 89.3%, 100%, and 100% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The PASS thresholds were ≤3, ≥87, and ≥86 after revision Latarjet for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved the PASS thresholds were 88%, 88%, and 91% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS, respectively.Conclusion:This study identified useful values for the MCID and PASS thresholds in VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores after primary and revision Latarjet procedures for treating shoulder instability. Most patients achieved MCID and PASS benchmarks, indicating successful primary and revision Latarjet procedure outcomes. These metrics can serve as valuable parameters when analyzing parameters in future studies and have the potential to enhance patient care by optimizing treatment strategies and surgical decision making.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241241538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Given the variability across populations and settings, defining the MCID and the PASS for the Rowe and ASOSS scores and patients undergoing primary and revision Latarjet it is essential to have accurate benchmarks relevant to these groups when interpreting clinical results.Purpose:To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain during sports, Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS), and Rowe scores after primary and revision Latarjet procedures for treatment of shoulder instability.Study Design:Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Between January 2018 and January 2020, a retrospective review of 149 patients undergoing primary Latarjet (n = 82) and revision Latarjet (n = 67) to treat shoulder instability was performed in a single institution. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The delta was defined as the change between the pre- and postoperative scores. Distribution-based and anchored-based approaches were used to estimate the MCID and the PASS, respectively. The optimal cutoff point and the percentage of patients achieving those thresholds were also calculated.Results:The distribution-based MCIDs after primary Latarjet were 1.1, 7.5, and 9.6 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved the MCID thresholds were 93.9%, 98.7%, and 100% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The PASS thresholds after primary Latarjet were ≤1, ≥90, and ≥85 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The percentages of patients who achieved PASS thresholds were 82.9%, 89%, and 86.5% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The distribution-based MCIDs after revision Latarjet were 0.6, 6.2, and 3.4 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved MCID thresholds were 89.3%, 100%, and 100% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The PASS thresholds were ≤3, ≥87, and ≥86 after revision Latarjet for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved the PASS thresholds were 88%, 88%, and 91% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS, respectively.Conclusion:This study identified useful values for the MCID and PASS thresholds in VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores after primary and revision Latarjet procedures for treating shoulder instability. Most patients achieved MCID and PASS benchmarks, indicating successful primary and revision Latarjet procedure outcomes. These metrics can serve as valuable parameters when analyzing parameters in future studies and have the potential to enhance patient care by optimizing treatment strategies and surgical decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
效果相当的初次和翻修拉塔切口手术的临床意义阈值
背景:考虑到不同人群和不同环境的差异性,在解释临床结果时,确定Rowe和ASOSS评分的最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值以及接受初治和翻修拉塔杰特手术的患者的最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值至关重要。目的:确定肩关节不稳定初治和复治Latarjet术后运动疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、运动肩关节结果评分系统(ASOSS)和Rowe评分的最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值。研究设计:队列研究(诊断);证据级别,3.方法:2018年1月至2020年1月期间,一家机构对149名接受初治Latarjet(n = 82)和复治Latarjet(n = 67)治疗肩关节不稳定的患者进行了回顾性审查。术前和术后一年收集了患者报告的结果指标。Delta定义为术前和术后评分之间的变化。分别采用基于分布和基于锚定的方法来估计 MCID 和 PASS。结果:基于分布的 MCID 分别为 1.1、7.5 和 9.6。VAS、Rowe 和 ASOSS 评分达到 MCID 临界值的患者比例分别为 93.9%、98.7% 和 100%。初级Latarjet治疗后,VAS、Rowe和ASOSS评分的PASS阈值分别为≤1、≥90和≥85。VAS、Rowe 和 ASOSS 评分达到 PASS 临界值的患者比例分别为 82.9%、89% 和 86.5%。改良拉塔杰特后,VAS、Rowe 和 ASOSS 评分的分布式 MCID 分别为 0.6、6.2 和 3.4。VAS、Rowe和ASOSS评分达到MCID阈值的患者比例分别为89.3%、100%和100%。修正 Latarjet 后,VAS、Rowe 和 ASOSS 评分的 PASS 临界值分别为≤3、≥87 和≥86。结论:该研究确定了治疗肩关节不稳定的初治和复治Latarjet术后VAS、Rowe和ASOSS评分的MCID和PASS阈值。大多数患者都达到了 MCID 和 PASS 临界值,这表明初治和复治 Latarjet 手术均取得了成功。这些指标可作为未来研究中分析参数时的重要参数,并有可能通过优化治疗策略和手术决策来加强对患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thank You, Reviewers! Strengthening the Evidence: Addressing Biases in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Studies: Response Strengthening the Evidence: Addressing Biases in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Studies: Letter to the Editor In Gratitude Presidential Address of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1