Clinical Outcomes and Graft Resorption After Metal-Free Bone Block Suture Tape Cerclage Fixation for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Computed Tomography Analysis

Abdul-ilah Hachem, Eduardo Diaz-Apablaza, Andres Molina-Creixell, Xavi Ruis, Sebastian Videla, Jose Luis Agulló
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes and Graft Resorption After Metal-Free Bone Block Suture Tape Cerclage Fixation for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Computed Tomography Analysis","authors":"Abdul-ilah Hachem, Eduardo Diaz-Apablaza, Andres Molina-Creixell, Xavi Ruis, Sebastian Videla, Jose Luis Agulló","doi":"10.1177/03635465241236179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Glenoid reconstruction with a bone block for anterior glenoid bone loss (GBL) has shown excellent outcomes. However, fixation techniques that require metal implants are associated with metal-related complications and bone graft resorption.Hypothesis:Arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction using a tricortical iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) and metal-free suture tape cerclage fixation can safely and effectively restore the glenoid surface area in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and anterior GBL.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Adult patients (≥18 years) of both sexes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and anterior GBL ≥15% were enrolled. These patients underwent arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction with ICBGs and metal-free suture tape cerclage fixation. The effectiveness and clinical outcomes with this technique were evaluated at 24 months using functional scores. Resorption of the graft articular surface was assessed by computed tomography, with the graft surface divided into 6 square areas aligned in 2 columns. Descriptive analysis was conducted.Results:A total of 23 consecutive patients met inclusion criteria (22 male, 1 female; mean age, 30.5 ± 7.9 years). The mean preoperative GBL was 19.7% ± 3.4%, and there were 15 allograft and 8 autograft ICBGs. All patients exhibited graft union at 3 months. The median follow-up was 38.5 months (interquartile range, 24-45 months). The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Rowe, Constant-Murley, and Subjective Shoulder Value scores improved from preoperatively (35.1%, 24.8, 83.1, and 30.9, respectively) to postoperatively (84.7%, 91.1, 96.0, and 90.9, respectively) ( P < .001). No differences in clinical scores were observed between the graft types. One surgical wound infection was reported, and 2 patients (8.7% [95% CI, 2.4%-26.8%]) required a reoperation. The mean overall glenoid surface area increased from 80.3% ± 3.5% to 117.0% ± 8.3% immediately after surgery before subsequently reducing to 98.7% ± 6.2% and 95.0% ± 5.7% at 12 and 24 months, respectively ( P < .001). The mean graft resorption rate was 18.1% ± 7.9% in the inner column and 80.3% ± 22.4% in the outer column. Additionally, 3 patients treated with an allograft (20.0% [95% CI, 7.1%-45.2%]), including the 2 with clinical failures, exhibited complete graft resorption at the last follow-up.Conclusion:Arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction using an ICBG and metal-free suture tape cerclage fixation was safe and effective, yielding excellent clinical outcomes. Resorption of the graft articular surface predominantly affected the nonloaded areas beyond the best-fit circle perimeter.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241236179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Glenoid reconstruction with a bone block for anterior glenoid bone loss (GBL) has shown excellent outcomes. However, fixation techniques that require metal implants are associated with metal-related complications and bone graft resorption.Hypothesis:Arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction using a tricortical iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) and metal-free suture tape cerclage fixation can safely and effectively restore the glenoid surface area in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and anterior GBL.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Adult patients (≥18 years) of both sexes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and anterior GBL ≥15% were enrolled. These patients underwent arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction with ICBGs and metal-free suture tape cerclage fixation. The effectiveness and clinical outcomes with this technique were evaluated at 24 months using functional scores. Resorption of the graft articular surface was assessed by computed tomography, with the graft surface divided into 6 square areas aligned in 2 columns. Descriptive analysis was conducted.Results:A total of 23 consecutive patients met inclusion criteria (22 male, 1 female; mean age, 30.5 ± 7.9 years). The mean preoperative GBL was 19.7% ± 3.4%, and there were 15 allograft and 8 autograft ICBGs. All patients exhibited graft union at 3 months. The median follow-up was 38.5 months (interquartile range, 24-45 months). The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Rowe, Constant-Murley, and Subjective Shoulder Value scores improved from preoperatively (35.1%, 24.8, 83.1, and 30.9, respectively) to postoperatively (84.7%, 91.1, 96.0, and 90.9, respectively) ( P < .001). No differences in clinical scores were observed between the graft types. One surgical wound infection was reported, and 2 patients (8.7% [95% CI, 2.4%-26.8%]) required a reoperation. The mean overall glenoid surface area increased from 80.3% ± 3.5% to 117.0% ± 8.3% immediately after surgery before subsequently reducing to 98.7% ± 6.2% and 95.0% ± 5.7% at 12 and 24 months, respectively ( P < .001). The mean graft resorption rate was 18.1% ± 7.9% in the inner column and 80.3% ± 22.4% in the outer column. Additionally, 3 patients treated with an allograft (20.0% [95% CI, 7.1%-45.2%]), including the 2 with clinical failures, exhibited complete graft resorption at the last follow-up.Conclusion:Arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction using an ICBG and metal-free suture tape cerclage fixation was safe and effective, yielding excellent clinical outcomes. Resorption of the graft articular surface predominantly affected the nonloaded areas beyond the best-fit circle perimeter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无金属骨块缝合带Cerclage固定治疗复发性肩关节前方失稳后的临床疗效和移植物吸收:计算机断层扫描分析
背景:使用骨块重建盂前骨缺损(GBL)的效果非常好。假设:使用三皮质髂嵴植骨(ICBG)和无金属缝合带cerclage固定的关节镜盂重建术可安全有效地恢复复发性肩关节前方不稳定和前方GBL患者的盂面面积。研究设计:病例系列;证据级别:4。研究方法:研究对象为复发性肩关节前方不稳定且前方GBL≥15%的成年男女患者(≥18岁)。这些患者接受了关节镜下的盂重建术,使用了ICBGs和无金属缝合带cerclage固定。该技术的有效性和临床疗效在24个月后通过功能评分进行评估。通过计算机断层扫描评估了移植物关节面的吸收情况,将移植物表面分为 6 个正方形区域,并以两列排列。结果:共有 23 名患者符合纳入标准(22 名男性,1 名女性;平均年龄(30.5 ± 7.9)岁)。术前GBL的平均值为19.7%±3.4%,异体移植ICBG 15例,自体移植ICBG 8例。所有患者均在 3 个月后出现移植物结合。中位随访时间为38.5个月(四分位间范围为24-45个月)。西安大略省肩关节不稳定性指数、Rowe、Constant-Murley 和肩关节主观价值评分从术前(分别为 35.1%、24.8、83.1 和 30.9)提高到术后(分别为 84.7%、91.1、96.0 和 90.9)(P < .001)。不同类型移植物的临床评分没有差异。有一项手术伤口感染报告,2 名患者(8.7% [95% CI, 2.4%-26.8%])需要再次手术。平均总体盂面面积在术后立即从 80.3% ± 3.5% 增加到 117.0% ± 8.3%,随后在 12 个月和 24 个月时分别降至 98.7% ± 6.2% 和 95.0% ± 5.7%(P <.001)。内柱的平均移植物吸收率为 18.1% ± 7.9%,外柱为 80.3% ± 22.4%。结论:使用 ICBG 和无金属缝合带卡环固定的关节镜盂重建安全有效,临床效果极佳。移植物关节面的吸收主要影响最佳匹配圆周以外的非负荷区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thank You, Reviewers! Strengthening the Evidence: Addressing Biases in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Studies: Response Strengthening the Evidence: Addressing Biases in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Studies: Letter to the Editor In Gratitude Presidential Address of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1