A comparison of stitching techniques to reconstruct large volume x-ray tomography of batteries

Matilda Fransson , Benoit Cordonnier , Ramon Zimmermanns , Paul R. Shearing , Alexander Rack , Ludovic Broche
{"title":"A comparison of stitching techniques to reconstruct large volume x-ray tomography of batteries","authors":"Matilda Fransson ,&nbsp;Benoit Cordonnier ,&nbsp;Ramon Zimmermanns ,&nbsp;Paul R. Shearing ,&nbsp;Alexander Rack ,&nbsp;Ludovic Broche","doi":"10.1016/j.tmater.2024.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography (μCT) is a valuable technique to study the internal structure of heterogeneous samples with high spatial and temporal resolution. However, synchrotron X-ray imaging, such as many microscopy methods, is solidly limited by its Field of View (FOV): a challenge when approaching large and/or highly detailed volumes at high spatial imaging resolution. In this study, we consider two techniques used to increase the FOV in µCT for studying Li-ion batteries, Local Tomography Stitching (LTS) and Sinogram Oriented Stitching (SOS), and compare in terms of scan time, processing efficiency and computing storage. We complement our study by estimating the impact of different battery geometries on the stitching performance for similar scanning parameters. Evaluation of the two presented techniques reveals that both provide equally satisfyingly stitched volumes. Nevertheless, it is demonstrated that SOS is predominantly more efficient for the considered battery geometries, requires fewer scans in total, and hence has a lower time and storage demand in comparison to LTS. However, technical constraints make the SOS technique more difficult to implement. Further discussed are differences in acquisition and reconstruction for the two techniques, addressing the processing efficiency for both SOS and LTS techniques and we shall provide indicators for selecting the most suitable stitching technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101254,"journal":{"name":"Tomography of Materials and Structures","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X24000068/pdfft?md5=39d788f96b4d61ee5fc0662c19bf4b41&pid=1-s2.0-S2949673X24000068-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomography of Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X24000068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography (μCT) is a valuable technique to study the internal structure of heterogeneous samples with high spatial and temporal resolution. However, synchrotron X-ray imaging, such as many microscopy methods, is solidly limited by its Field of View (FOV): a challenge when approaching large and/or highly detailed volumes at high spatial imaging resolution. In this study, we consider two techniques used to increase the FOV in µCT for studying Li-ion batteries, Local Tomography Stitching (LTS) and Sinogram Oriented Stitching (SOS), and compare in terms of scan time, processing efficiency and computing storage. We complement our study by estimating the impact of different battery geometries on the stitching performance for similar scanning parameters. Evaluation of the two presented techniques reveals that both provide equally satisfyingly stitched volumes. Nevertheless, it is demonstrated that SOS is predominantly more efficient for the considered battery geometries, requires fewer scans in total, and hence has a lower time and storage demand in comparison to LTS. However, technical constraints make the SOS technique more difficult to implement. Further discussed are differences in acquisition and reconstruction for the two techniques, addressing the processing efficiency for both SOS and LTS techniques and we shall provide indicators for selecting the most suitable stitching technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重建电池大体积 X 射线断层成像的拼接技术比较
同步辐射 X 射线显微层析成像(μCT)是一项宝贵的技术,可用于研究高空间和时间分辨率的异质样品内部结构。然而,同步辐射 X 射线成像和许多显微镜方法一样,都受到视场(FOV)的严重限制:这是以高空间成像分辨率处理大体积和/或高细节体积时所面临的挑战。在本研究中,我们考虑了用于提高μCT视场(FOV)以研究锂离子电池的两种技术,即局部断层扫描拼接(LTS)和面向中图的拼接(SOS),并在扫描时间、处理效率和计算存储方面进行了比较。我们通过估算不同电池几何形状对类似扫描参数下拼接性能的影响来补充我们的研究。对这两种技术的评估表明,它们都能提供同样令人满意的拼接体积。然而,研究表明,对于所考虑的电池几何形状,SOS 的效率更高,所需的扫描次数更少,因此与 LTS 相比,对时间和存储的需求更低。然而,技术上的限制使得 SOS 技术更难实施。我们将进一步讨论两种技术在采集和重建方面的差异,解决 SOS 和 LTS 技术的处理效率问题,并为选择最合适的拼接技术提供指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of AI crack segmentation models for additive manufacturing Contrast-enhancing staining agents for ex vivo contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A review Visualizing pulp fibers using X-ray tomography: Enhancing the contrast by labeling with iron oxide nanoparticles and the use of immersion oil 3D mineral quantification of particulate materials with rare earth mineral inclusions: Achieving sub-voxel resolution by considering the partial volume and blurring effect Geo-SegNet: A contrastive learning enhanced U-net for geomaterial segmentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1