A prospective randomized study comparing two frameless immobilization systems for cranial stereotactic radiotherapy

Dylan Callens , Chahrazad Benazzouz , Lise Stessens , Wout Piot , An Nulens , Maarten Lambrecht , Patrick Berkovic , Jean-François Daisne
{"title":"A prospective randomized study comparing two frameless immobilization systems for cranial stereotactic radiotherapy","authors":"Dylan Callens ,&nbsp;Chahrazad Benazzouz ,&nbsp;Lise Stessens ,&nbsp;Wout Piot ,&nbsp;An Nulens ,&nbsp;Maarten Lambrecht ,&nbsp;Patrick Berkovic ,&nbsp;Jean-François Daisne","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The Dual Shell Encompass Fibreplast™ System (DS-Encompass) by CQ Medical™ is validated for frameless immobilization in stereotactic brain radiotherapy. An alternative mask model has been proposed with the rear shell replaced by a Moldcare® cushion (M−Encompass). To validate the use of this model in our cranial stereotactic workflow method including HyperArc™, we performed a prospective randomized study comparing inter-and intrafractional motion and patients comfort between both masks.</p></div><div><h3>Materials &amp; Methods</h3><p>A prospective randomized study between DS-Encompass and M−Encompass was conducted involving 60 participants. Stratification between DS-Encompass and M−Encompass was carried out based on the fractionation scheme. Treatment plans were created with HyperArc™. During treatment, surface guidance was used for patient positioning and monitoring. A pre-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT) was acquired to correct interfractional motion and a post-treatment CBCT was acquired to quantify the intrafractional motion. Patients reported comfort was analyzed with a Likert-scale at the end of the treatment. Unpaired t-tests were conducted to determine the level of significance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference in interfractional translations is present. A significant difference is revealed in roll-axis rotation, where DS-Encompass allows for smaller deviations. Since interfractional motion can be corrected through daily CBCT-scans and 6D-couch corrections, they are clinically irrelevant. Intrafractional motion does not differ significantly and remains below 0.5 mm and 0.5° for both systems. There is no statistical difference in patient-reported comfort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that Encompass with Moldcare offers a safe alternative to Duall Shell Encompass for non-coplanar stereotactic brain radiotherapy. There is no significant difference in intrafractional motion nor difference in comfort levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000167/pdfft?md5=963922d30176313bcfa12c7f536cbb01&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000167-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Dual Shell Encompass Fibreplast™ System (DS-Encompass) by CQ Medical™ is validated for frameless immobilization in stereotactic brain radiotherapy. An alternative mask model has been proposed with the rear shell replaced by a Moldcare® cushion (M−Encompass). To validate the use of this model in our cranial stereotactic workflow method including HyperArc™, we performed a prospective randomized study comparing inter-and intrafractional motion and patients comfort between both masks.

Materials & Methods

A prospective randomized study between DS-Encompass and M−Encompass was conducted involving 60 participants. Stratification between DS-Encompass and M−Encompass was carried out based on the fractionation scheme. Treatment plans were created with HyperArc™. During treatment, surface guidance was used for patient positioning and monitoring. A pre-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT) was acquired to correct interfractional motion and a post-treatment CBCT was acquired to quantify the intrafractional motion. Patients reported comfort was analyzed with a Likert-scale at the end of the treatment. Unpaired t-tests were conducted to determine the level of significance.

Results

No significant difference in interfractional translations is present. A significant difference is revealed in roll-axis rotation, where DS-Encompass allows for smaller deviations. Since interfractional motion can be corrected through daily CBCT-scans and 6D-couch corrections, they are clinically irrelevant. Intrafractional motion does not differ significantly and remains below 0.5 mm and 0.5° for both systems. There is no statistical difference in patient-reported comfort.

Conclusion

We conclude that Encompass with Moldcare offers a safe alternative to Duall Shell Encompass for non-coplanar stereotactic brain radiotherapy. There is no significant difference in intrafractional motion nor difference in comfort levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较两种头颅立体定向放射治疗无框架固定系统的前瞻性随机研究
引言 CQ Medical™ 公司的双壳 Encompass Fibreplast™ 系统(DS-Encompass)已通过验证,可用于脑立体定向放射治疗中的无框架固定。还提出了另一种面罩模型,其后壳由 Moldcare® 软垫取代(M-Encompass)。为了验证该模型在包括 HyperArc™ 在内的头颅立体定向工作流程方法中的应用,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,比较了两种面罩之间的点间和点内运动以及患者的舒适度。根据分层方案对 DS-Encompass 和 M-Encompass 进行了分层。使用 HyperArc™ 创建了治疗计划。在治疗过程中,表面引导用于患者定位和监测。采集治疗前锥形束 CT (CBCT) 以纠正点间移动,采集治疗后 CBCT 以量化点内移动。治疗结束后,采用李克特量表对患者报告的舒适度进行分析。进行非配对 t 检验以确定显著性水平。在滚动轴旋转方面存在明显差异,DS-Encompass 允许的偏差较小。由于切迹间运动可以通过日常的 CBCT 扫描和 6D 凹陷矫正进行校正,因此与临床无关。两个系统的切迹内移动差异不大,都保持在 0.5 毫米和 0.5°以下。结论我们得出结论,在非共面立体定向脑放射治疗中,带有 Moldcare 的 Encompass 可以安全地替代 Duall Shell Encompass。在点内运动和舒适度方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
Treatment efficiency and quality improvement via double imaging modality (DIM) versus single imaging modality (SIM) image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer Patient experience preparing for prostate cancer radiotherapy Training for tomorrow: Establishing a worldwide curriculum in online adaptive radiation therapy Pan-Canadian assessment of image guided adaptive radiation therapy and the role of the radiation therapist Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of CTV contour adaptations by radiation therapists for adaptive prostate radiotherapy on a 0.35 T MR-Linac
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1