Reference prior for Bayesian estimation of seismic fragility curves

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103622
Antoine Van Biesbroeck , Clément Gauchy , Cyril Feau , Josselin Garnier
{"title":"Reference prior for Bayesian estimation of seismic fragility curves","authors":"Antoine Van Biesbroeck ,&nbsp;Clément Gauchy ,&nbsp;Cyril Feau ,&nbsp;Josselin Garnier","doi":"10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the key elements of probabilistic seismic risk assessment studies is the fragility curve, which represents the conditional probability of failure of a mechanical structure for a given scalar measure derived from seismic ground motion. For many structures of interest, estimating these curves is a daunting task because of the limited amount of data available; data which is only binary in our framework, i.e., only describing the structure as being in a failure or non-failure state. A large number of methods described in the literature tackle this challenging framework through parametric log-normal models. Bayesian approaches, on the other hand, allow model parameters to be learned more efficiently. However, the impact of the choice of the prior distribution on the posterior distribution cannot be readily neglected and, consequently, neither can its impact on any resulting estimation. This paper proposes a comprehensive study of this parametric Bayesian estimation problem for limited and binary data. Using the reference prior theory as a cornerstone, this study develops an objective approach to choosing the prior. This approach leads to the Jeffreys prior, which is derived for this problem for the first time. The posterior distribution is proven to be proper (i.e., it integrates to unity) with the Jeffreys prior but improper with some traditional priors found in the literature. With the Jeffreys prior, the posterior distribution is also shown to vanish at the boundaries of the parameters’ domain, which means that sampling the posterior distribution of the parameters does not result in anomalously small or large values. Therefore, the use of the Jeffreys prior does not result in degenerate fragility curves such as unit-step functions, and leads to more robust credibility intervals. The numerical results obtained from two different case studies—including an industrial example—illustrate the theoretical predictions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54583,"journal":{"name":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266892024000444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the key elements of probabilistic seismic risk assessment studies is the fragility curve, which represents the conditional probability of failure of a mechanical structure for a given scalar measure derived from seismic ground motion. For many structures of interest, estimating these curves is a daunting task because of the limited amount of data available; data which is only binary in our framework, i.e., only describing the structure as being in a failure or non-failure state. A large number of methods described in the literature tackle this challenging framework through parametric log-normal models. Bayesian approaches, on the other hand, allow model parameters to be learned more efficiently. However, the impact of the choice of the prior distribution on the posterior distribution cannot be readily neglected and, consequently, neither can its impact on any resulting estimation. This paper proposes a comprehensive study of this parametric Bayesian estimation problem for limited and binary data. Using the reference prior theory as a cornerstone, this study develops an objective approach to choosing the prior. This approach leads to the Jeffreys prior, which is derived for this problem for the first time. The posterior distribution is proven to be proper (i.e., it integrates to unity) with the Jeffreys prior but improper with some traditional priors found in the literature. With the Jeffreys prior, the posterior distribution is also shown to vanish at the boundaries of the parameters’ domain, which means that sampling the posterior distribution of the parameters does not result in anomalously small or large values. Therefore, the use of the Jeffreys prior does not result in degenerate fragility curves such as unit-step functions, and leads to more robust credibility intervals. The numerical results obtained from two different case studies—including an industrial example—illustrate the theoretical predictions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地震脆性曲线贝叶斯估算的参考先验
概率地震风险评估研究的关键要素之一是脆性曲线,它代表了机械结构在地震地面运动产生的给定标量下发生破坏的条件概率。对于许多相关结构而言,估算这些曲线是一项艰巨的任务,因为可用的数据量有限;在我们的框架中,这些数据只是二元数据,即只能描述结构处于失效或非失效状态。文献中描述的大量方法都是通过参数对数正态模型来处理这一具有挑战性的框架。另一方面,贝叶斯方法可以更有效地学习模型参数。然而,先验分布的选择对后验分布的影响不容忽视,因此对估计结果的影响也不容忽视。本文提出对有限数据和二元数据的参数贝叶斯估计问题进行全面研究。本研究以参考先验理论为基础,开发了一种选择先验的客观方法。这种方法导致了 Jeffreys 先验,并首次针对该问题推导出了 Jeffreys 先验。事实证明,杰弗里斯先验的后验分布是适当的(即积分为一),而文献中的一些传统先验的后验分布是不适当的。使用杰弗里斯先验时,后验分布在参数域的边界处也会消失,这意味着对参数的后验分布进行采样不会产生异常小或异常大的值。因此,使用 Jeffreys 先验不会导致退化的脆性曲线(如单位阶跃函数),并带来更稳健的可信区间。从两个不同的案例研究(包括一个工业实例)中获得的数值结果证明了理论预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
98
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scholarly work dealing primarily with probabilistic and statistical approaches to contemporary solid/structural and fluid mechanics problems encountered in diverse technical disciplines such as aerospace, civil, marine, mechanical, and nuclear engineering. The journal aims to maintain a healthy balance between general solution techniques and problem-specific results, encouraging a fruitful exchange of ideas among disparate engineering specialities.
期刊最新文献
Real-time anomaly detection of the stochastically excited systems on spherical (S2) manifold Nonprobabilistic time-dependent reliability analysis for uncertain structures under interval process loads Fractional-order filter approximations for efficient stochastic response determination of wind-excited linear structural systems Seismic reliability analysis using Subset Simulation enhanced with an explorative adaptive conditional sampling algorithm Efficient optimization-based method for simultaneous calibration of load and resistance factors considering multiple target reliability indices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1