Differences Between Traumatic and Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review

Kristine Mundal, Andrew G. Geeslin, Eirik Solheim, Eivind Inderhaug
{"title":"Differences Between Traumatic and Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review","authors":"Kristine Mundal, Andrew G. Geeslin, Eirik Solheim, Eivind Inderhaug","doi":"10.1177/03635465241237254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Intact meniscus roots are a prerequisite for normal meniscal function, including even distribution of compressive forces across the knee joint. An injury to the root disrupts the hoop strength of the meniscus and may lead to its extrusion and the development of osteoarthritis. A medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is often thought to have a primary degenerative pathogenesis. However, there is mention of some cases of MMPRTs where the patients have a solely traumatic injury to a previously healthy meniscus.Purpose:To describe a subpopulation of patients with traumatic MMPRT.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.Methods:The Web of Science database ( www.webofscience.com ) was queried using the Medical Subject Headings term “medial root tear.” Articles were reviewed, and those evaluated for MMPRTs in a degenerative meniscus were excluded. A total of 25 articles describing cases of acute traumatic causes were included in this study. For these articles, the patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and concomitant injuries evaluated were recorded and pooled.Results:The search revealed 660 articles, and 25 were selected for inclusion. A total of 113 patients with a traumatic MMPRT were identified and included in this review. The study population had a mean age of 27.1 years and a high share of men (64%). Also, this review displays how most patients with traumatic MMPRTs also suffer concomitant injuries (68%).Conclusion:The findings in this review support our hypothesis that there is a unique subgroup with acute traumatic MMPRTs that have unique patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and combined injuries, compared with previously published reviews on MMPRTs.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241237254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Intact meniscus roots are a prerequisite for normal meniscal function, including even distribution of compressive forces across the knee joint. An injury to the root disrupts the hoop strength of the meniscus and may lead to its extrusion and the development of osteoarthritis. A medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is often thought to have a primary degenerative pathogenesis. However, there is mention of some cases of MMPRTs where the patients have a solely traumatic injury to a previously healthy meniscus.Purpose:To describe a subpopulation of patients with traumatic MMPRT.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.Methods:The Web of Science database ( www.webofscience.com ) was queried using the Medical Subject Headings term “medial root tear.” Articles were reviewed, and those evaluated for MMPRTs in a degenerative meniscus were excluded. A total of 25 articles describing cases of acute traumatic causes were included in this study. For these articles, the patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and concomitant injuries evaluated were recorded and pooled.Results:The search revealed 660 articles, and 25 were selected for inclusion. A total of 113 patients with a traumatic MMPRT were identified and included in this review. The study population had a mean age of 27.1 years and a high share of men (64%). Also, this review displays how most patients with traumatic MMPRTs also suffer concomitant injuries (68%).Conclusion:The findings in this review support our hypothesis that there is a unique subgroup with acute traumatic MMPRTs that have unique patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and combined injuries, compared with previously published reviews on MMPRTs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性和退行性内侧半月板后根撕裂的区别:系统性综述
背景:完整的半月板根部是半月板正常功能的先决条件,包括压缩力在膝关节内的均匀分布。半月板根部的损伤会破坏半月板的箍强度,并可能导致半月板挤出和骨关节炎的发生。内侧半月板后根撕裂(MMPRT)通常被认为是一种原发性退行性病变。目的:描述外伤性半月板后根撕裂患者的一个亚群。研究设计:系统综述;证据等级,5。方法:使用医学主题词 "内侧半月板后根撕裂 "查询科学网数据库(www.webofscience.com)。对文章进行了审查,并排除了那些对退行性半月板内侧根撕裂进行评估的文章。本研究共收录了 25 篇描述急性创伤病例的文章。对于这些文章,研究人员记录并汇总了患者特征、损伤机制以及所评估的伴随损伤。共有113名外伤性MMPRT患者被确定并纳入本综述。研究对象的平均年龄为27.1岁,男性比例较高(64%)。结论:本综述的研究结果支持了我们的假设,即与之前发表的有关 MMPRTs 的综述相比,急性外伤性 MMPRTs 有一个独特的亚群,该亚群具有独特的患者特征、损伤机制和合并损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High Rate of Return to Sport in Contact and Collision Athletes After Arthroscopic Latarjet With Cortical Button Fixation. Posterior Glenoid Bone Grafting in the Setting of Excessive Glenoid Retroversion Does Not Provide Adequate Stability in a Cadaveric Posterior Instability Model. Association of Undercorrection With Residual Proinflammatory Gene Expressions and Clinical Outcomes After Medial Open Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy. Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Medial Femoral Condyle in Patients With Varus and Nonvarus Alignment. Posterior Tibial Slope Measured on Plain Radiograph Versus MRI and Its Association With Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case-Control Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1