Assessing intradisciplinary pharmacy communication related to transitions of care

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100438
Letitia N. Warunek PharmD, BCPS, Brenda Gruver PharmD, Liam Bartko PharmD, Jaycee Blair PharmD
{"title":"Assessing intradisciplinary pharmacy communication related to transitions of care","authors":"Letitia N. Warunek PharmD, BCPS,&nbsp;Brenda Gruver PharmD,&nbsp;Liam Bartko PharmD,&nbsp;Jaycee Blair PharmD","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pharmacists play an important role in transitions of care, where successful communication is vital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the extent of intradisciplinary communication between pharmacists during patient transitions of care. Secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacist communication practices and to explore the potential barriers and facilitators to effective health communications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A twenty item online survey was administered by email to all pharmacists practicing within a multisite regional healthcare system in central and northeastern Pennsylvania. Statistical analysis consisted of descriptive statistics for multiple choice, select all that apply, and Likert-type questions. Themes were summarized for open ended questions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 132 (32%) pharmacists responded to the survey of which 90 responses were included in the analysis. The majority of pharmacists felt either extremely comfortable (53.3%) or somewhat comfortable (33.3%) reaching out to another pharmacist within the same health system. However, most contacted other pharmacy disciplines within the health system ≤25% of their work week. The ability to reach the pharmacist was the most important factor to pharmacist comfort (extremely important <em>n</em> = 56, somewhat important <em>n</em> = 27). Not knowing who to contact was the biggest barrier (44.8%). The electronic messaging systems Microsoft Teams (almost always <em>n</em> = 33, often <em>n</em> = 25) and TigerText (almost always <em>n</em> = 17, often <em>n</em> = 23) were the forms of communication utilized most often.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pharmacists feel comfortable communicating with pharmacists across different entities within the health system, however, intradisciplinary communication related to transitions of care activities is limited. Improving awareness of system-wide pharmacist directories (34.2%) and distribution of pharmacist schedules (18.4%) were identified as tools that may improve communication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000349/pdfft?md5=30b24ff17e9efdc484a11f725b0b4e7f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000349-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pharmacists play an important role in transitions of care, where successful communication is vital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the extent of intradisciplinary communication between pharmacists during patient transitions of care. Secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacist communication practices and to explore the potential barriers and facilitators to effective health communications.

Methods

A twenty item online survey was administered by email to all pharmacists practicing within a multisite regional healthcare system in central and northeastern Pennsylvania. Statistical analysis consisted of descriptive statistics for multiple choice, select all that apply, and Likert-type questions. Themes were summarized for open ended questions.

Results

A total of 132 (32%) pharmacists responded to the survey of which 90 responses were included in the analysis. The majority of pharmacists felt either extremely comfortable (53.3%) or somewhat comfortable (33.3%) reaching out to another pharmacist within the same health system. However, most contacted other pharmacy disciplines within the health system ≤25% of their work week. The ability to reach the pharmacist was the most important factor to pharmacist comfort (extremely important n = 56, somewhat important n = 27). Not knowing who to contact was the biggest barrier (44.8%). The electronic messaging systems Microsoft Teams (almost always n = 33, often n = 25) and TigerText (almost always n = 17, often n = 23) were the forms of communication utilized most often.

Conclusions

Pharmacists feel comfortable communicating with pharmacists across different entities within the health system, however, intradisciplinary communication related to transitions of care activities is limited. Improving awareness of system-wide pharmacist directories (34.2%) and distribution of pharmacist schedules (18.4%) were identified as tools that may improve communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估与护理过渡相关的学科内药学交流
背景药剂师在护理过渡中发挥着重要作用,而成功的沟通对于护理过渡至关重要。本研究的主要目的是评估在患者护理过渡期间药剂师之间的学科内沟通程度。次要目标是评估药剂师的沟通实践,并探讨有效健康沟通的潜在障碍和促进因素。方法:通过电子邮件向宾夕法尼亚州中部和东北部一个多站点区域医疗保健系统内的所有执业药剂师发放了一份包含 20 个项目的在线调查问卷。统计分析包括多选、全选和李克特类型问题的描述性统计。结果 共有 132 名药剂师(32%)对调查做出了回复,其中 90 份回复纳入了分析。大多数药剂师认为,与同一医疗系统内的其他药剂师联系非常方便(53.3%)或比较方便(33.3%)。然而,大多数药剂师在工作周内联系医疗系统内其他药学学科的比例不超过 25%。能够联系到药剂师是让药剂师感到舒适的最重要因素(极其重要 n = 56,比较重要 n = 27)。不知道与谁联系是最大的障碍(44.8%)。电子信息系统 Microsoft Teams(几乎总是 n = 33,经常 n = 25)和 TigerText(几乎总是 n = 17,经常 n = 23)是最常用的沟通方式。提高对全系统药剂师目录的认识(34.2%)和分发药剂师日程表(18.4%)被认为是可以改善沟通的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Montelukast deprescribing in outpatient specialty clinics: A single center cross-sectional study Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand Comparing nursing medication rounds before and after implementation of automated dispensing cabinets: A time and motion study Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the general medication adherence scale (GMAS) in patients with high blood pressure A cross-sectional survey exploring organizational readiness to implement community pharmacy-based opioid counseling and naloxone services in rural versus urban settings in Alabama
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1