Gender, racial-ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in the development of social-emotional competence among elementary school students

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101311
Juyeon Lee , Valerie B. Shapiro , Jennifer L. Robitaille , Paul LeBuffe
{"title":"Gender, racial-ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in the development of social-emotional competence among elementary school students","authors":"Juyeon Lee ,&nbsp;Valerie B. Shapiro ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Robitaille ,&nbsp;Paul LeBuffe","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social-emotional competence (SEC) has been demonstrated to be a crucial factor for student mental health and is malleable through the high-quality implementation of effective school-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs. SEL is now widely practiced in the United States as a Tier 1 strategy for the entire student body, yet it remains unclear whether disparities exist in the development of SEC across socio-culturally classified subgroups of students. Also, despite the field's widespread concern about teacher bias in assessing SEC within diverse student bodies, little evidence is available on the measurement invariance of the SEC assessment tools used to explore and facilitate SEC development. Based on a sociocultural view of student SEC development, this study aimed to measure and examine the extent to which gender, racial-ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities exist in SEC developmental trajectories during elementary school years. Specifically, using 3 years of SEC assessment data collected from a districtwide SEL initiative (<em>N</em> = 5452; Grades K–2 at baseline; nine measurement occasions), this study (a) tested the measurement invariance of a widely-used, teacher-rated SEC assessment tool (DESSA-Mini) across student gender, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES); and (b) examined the extent to which multiyear SEC growth trajectories differed across these subgroups under a routine SEL practice condition. The invariance testing results supported strict factorial invariance of the DESSA-Mini across all the examined subgroups, thereby providing a foundation for valid cross-group comparisons of student SEC growth. The piecewise latent growth modeling results indicated that boys (vs. girls), Black students (vs. White students), Hispanic students (vs. White students), and low-income students (vs. middle-to-high-income students) started with a lower level of SEC, with these gaps being sustained or slightly widened throughout 3 elementary school years. Based on these findings, this study calls for future research that can inform practice efforts to ensure equitable SEC assessments and produce more equitable SEL outcomes, thereby promoting equity in school mental health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 101311"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524000311","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social-emotional competence (SEC) has been demonstrated to be a crucial factor for student mental health and is malleable through the high-quality implementation of effective school-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs. SEL is now widely practiced in the United States as a Tier 1 strategy for the entire student body, yet it remains unclear whether disparities exist in the development of SEC across socio-culturally classified subgroups of students. Also, despite the field's widespread concern about teacher bias in assessing SEC within diverse student bodies, little evidence is available on the measurement invariance of the SEC assessment tools used to explore and facilitate SEC development. Based on a sociocultural view of student SEC development, this study aimed to measure and examine the extent to which gender, racial-ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities exist in SEC developmental trajectories during elementary school years. Specifically, using 3 years of SEC assessment data collected from a districtwide SEL initiative (N = 5452; Grades K–2 at baseline; nine measurement occasions), this study (a) tested the measurement invariance of a widely-used, teacher-rated SEC assessment tool (DESSA-Mini) across student gender, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES); and (b) examined the extent to which multiyear SEC growth trajectories differed across these subgroups under a routine SEL practice condition. The invariance testing results supported strict factorial invariance of the DESSA-Mini across all the examined subgroups, thereby providing a foundation for valid cross-group comparisons of student SEC growth. The piecewise latent growth modeling results indicated that boys (vs. girls), Black students (vs. White students), Hispanic students (vs. White students), and low-income students (vs. middle-to-high-income students) started with a lower level of SEC, with these gaps being sustained or slightly widened throughout 3 elementary school years. Based on these findings, this study calls for future research that can inform practice efforts to ensure equitable SEC assessments and produce more equitable SEL outcomes, thereby promoting equity in school mental health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学生社会情感能力发展中的性别、种族-民族和社会经济差异
社会情感能力(Social-emotional competence,SEC)已被证明是影响学生心理健康的关键因素,通过高质量地实施有效的校本社会情感学习(Social and emotional learning,SEL)计划,SEC是可以改变的。目前,美国已将社会与情感学习(SEL)作为面向全体学生的一级策略广泛开展,但社会与情感学习(SEC)在社会文化分类的学生亚群中的发展是否存在差异,目前仍不清楚。此外,尽管该领域普遍关注教师在评估不同学生群体中的 SEC 时存在偏差,但几乎没有证据表明用于探索和促进 SEC 发展的 SEC 评估工具具有测量不变性。基于对学生SEC发展的社会文化观点,本研究旨在测量和检验小学阶段SEC发展轨迹中存在的性别、种族-民族和社会经济差异的程度。具体来说,本研究利用从全区 SEL 行动中收集的 3 年 SEC 评估数据(N = 5452;基线为 K-2 年级;9 次测量),(a) 测试了广泛使用的、由教师评分的 SEC 评估工具(DESSA-Mini)在不同学生性别、种族和民族以及社会经济地位(SES)之间的测量不变性;(b) 研究了在常规 SEL 实践条件下,这些亚群的多年 SEC 增长轨迹的差异程度。不变性测试结果表明,DESSA-Mini 在所有被考察的亚群体中都具有严格的因子不变性,从而为有效地跨群体比较学生的 SEC 增长情况奠定了基础。片式潜增长建模结果表明,男生(与女生相比)、黑人学生(与白人学生相比)、西班牙裔学生(与白人学生相比)和低收入学生(与中高收入学生相比)一开始的SEC水平较低,这些差距在小学三年中一直保持或略有扩大。基于这些发现,本研究呼吁未来的研究能够为实践工作提供信息,以确保 SEC 评估的公平性,并产生更公平的 SEL 结果,从而促进学校心理健康的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the treatment utility of the Cognitive Assessment System: A meta-analysis of reading and mathematics outcomes The CARES classroom observation tool: Psychometrics of an observational measure of culturally responsive practices Profiles of principal stress and coping: Concurrent and prospective correlates Emotional intersection: Delineating test anxiety, emotional disorders, and student well-being Universal Teacher-Child Interaction Training in early childhood special education: Identifying mechanisms of action that explain why it works
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1