Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer

IF 3.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Atmospheric Environment: X Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100258
Pablo García, Anna Holm Støckler, Anders Feilberg, Jesper Nørlem Kamp
{"title":"Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer","authors":"Pablo García,&nbsp;Anna Holm Støckler,&nbsp;Anders Feilberg,&nbsp;Jesper Nørlem Kamp","doi":"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emissions from agriculture are a worldwide problem as it is the major anthropogenic source of ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide. Several efforts have been made to mitigate emissions. To achieve this, reliable measuring techniques are necessary to quantify the impact of the emissions. Different techniques relying on different principles are available. Generally, these techniques demonstrate good agreement on their measurements but there is a lack of studies that thoroughly investigate cross-interferences. In this work, three different models of Cavity Ring-Down Spectrometers measuring ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane were tested in parallel for potential biases due to interference from ammonia, water vapor, and twelve volatile organic compounds commonly present in agricultural environments. Our results showed a small negative bias with increasing humidity on nitrous oxide and minor interferences of ammonia on nitrous oxide and methane. None of the tested volatile organic compounds interfered with ammonia, methane, or nitrous oxide measurements. Overall, concentration measurements of ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane with cavity ring-down spectrometry have proven reliable under typical agricultural conditions. Minor interferences were only observed under exceptional conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37150,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259016212400025X/pdfft?md5=e7a4646785bf2edef0ed02d5f2a9dc30&pid=1-s2.0-S259016212400025X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259016212400025X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emissions from agriculture are a worldwide problem as it is the major anthropogenic source of ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide. Several efforts have been made to mitigate emissions. To achieve this, reliable measuring techniques are necessary to quantify the impact of the emissions. Different techniques relying on different principles are available. Generally, these techniques demonstrate good agreement on their measurements but there is a lack of studies that thoroughly investigate cross-interferences. In this work, three different models of Cavity Ring-Down Spectrometers measuring ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane were tested in parallel for potential biases due to interference from ammonia, water vapor, and twelve volatile organic compounds commonly present in agricultural environments. Our results showed a small negative bias with increasing humidity on nitrous oxide and minor interferences of ammonia on nitrous oxide and methane. None of the tested volatile organic compounds interfered with ammonia, methane, or nitrous oxide measurements. Overall, concentration measurements of ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane with cavity ring-down spectrometry have proven reliable under typical agricultural conditions. Minor interferences were only observed under exceptional conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多气腔环降光谱仪上的非目标气体干扰调查
农业排放是一个世界性问题,因为它是氨气、甲烷和氧化亚氮的主要人为来源。为了减少排放,人们已经做出了许多努力。为此,需要可靠的测量技术来量化排放的影响。目前有基于不同原理的不同技术。一般来说,这些技术的测量结果显示出良好的一致性,但缺乏彻底调查交叉干扰的研究。在这项工作中,我们对测量氨、一氧化二氮和甲烷的三种不同型号的空腔环降分光仪进行了平行测试,以了解氨、水蒸气和农业环境中常见的 12 种挥发性有机化合物的干扰可能造成的偏差。结果表明,随着湿度的增加,氧化亚氮会出现微小的负偏差,而氨对氧化亚氮和甲烷的干扰较小。所测试的挥发性有机化合物都不会干扰氨、甲烷或一氧化二氮的测量。总的来说,在典型的农业条件下,使用空腔降环光谱法测量氨、一氧化二氮和甲烷的浓度是可靠的。只有在特殊条件下才能观察到轻微的干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment: X
Atmospheric Environment: X Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Detection and analysis of ship emissions using single-particle mass spectrometry: A land-based field study in the port of rostock, Germany Comparison of global air pollution impacts across horizontal resolutions Manifesting the hidden pollutants: Quantifying emissions and environmental impact of petroleum refinery on PM2.5 Quantifying particulate matter emission rates from naturally ventilated dairy buildings by considering roof opening contributions Regional and seasonal impact of hydrogen propulsion systems on potential contrail cirrus cover
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1