Exploring the Impact of 3D Fast Spin Echo and Inversion Recovery Gradient Echo Sequences Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition on Automated Brain Tumor Segmentation
Mana Moassefi MD , Shahriar Faghani MD , Sara Khanipour Roshan MD , Gian Marco Conte MD, PhD , Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad Mousavi MD , Timothy J. Kaufmann MD , Bradley J. Erickson MD, PhD
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of 3D Fast Spin Echo and Inversion Recovery Gradient Echo Sequences Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition on Automated Brain Tumor Segmentation","authors":"Mana Moassefi MD , Shahriar Faghani MD , Sara Khanipour Roshan MD , Gian Marco Conte MD, PhD , Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad Mousavi MD , Timothy J. Kaufmann MD , Bradley J. Erickson MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To conduct a study comparing the performance of automated segmentation techniques using 2 different contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CET1) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We collected 100 preoperative glioblastoma (GBM) MRIs consisting of 50 IR-GRE and 50 3-dimensional fast spin echo (3D-FSE) image sets. Their gold-standard tumor segmentation mask was created based on the expert opinion of a neuroradiologist. Cases were randomly divided into training and test sets. We used the no new UNet (nnUNet) architecture pretrained on the 501-image public data set containing IR-GRE sequence image sets, followed by 2 training rounds with the IR-GRE and 3D-FSE images, respectively. For each patient, in the IR-GRE and 3D-FSE test sets, we had 2 prediction masks, one from the model fine-tuned with the IR-GRE training set and one with 3D-FSE. The dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the 2 sets of results for each case in the test sets were compared using the Wilcoxon tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Models trained on 3D-FSE images outperformed IR-GRE models in lesion segmentation, with mean DSC differences of 0.057 and 0.022 in the respective test sets. For the 3D-FSE and IR-GRE test sets, the calculated <em>P</em> values comparing DSCs from 2 models were .02 and .61, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Including 3D-FSE MRI in the training data set improves segmentation performance when segmenting 3D-FSE images.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 231-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000269/pdfft?md5=f561c94cea75e11c92b35216bd0136b8&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000269-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To conduct a study comparing the performance of automated segmentation techniques using 2 different contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CET1) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition protocol.
Patients and Methods
We collected 100 preoperative glioblastoma (GBM) MRIs consisting of 50 IR-GRE and 50 3-dimensional fast spin echo (3D-FSE) image sets. Their gold-standard tumor segmentation mask was created based on the expert opinion of a neuroradiologist. Cases were randomly divided into training and test sets. We used the no new UNet (nnUNet) architecture pretrained on the 501-image public data set containing IR-GRE sequence image sets, followed by 2 training rounds with the IR-GRE and 3D-FSE images, respectively. For each patient, in the IR-GRE and 3D-FSE test sets, we had 2 prediction masks, one from the model fine-tuned with the IR-GRE training set and one with 3D-FSE. The dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the 2 sets of results for each case in the test sets were compared using the Wilcoxon tests.
Results
Models trained on 3D-FSE images outperformed IR-GRE models in lesion segmentation, with mean DSC differences of 0.057 and 0.022 in the respective test sets. For the 3D-FSE and IR-GRE test sets, the calculated P values comparing DSCs from 2 models were .02 and .61, respectively.
Conclusion
Including 3D-FSE MRI in the training data set improves segmentation performance when segmenting 3D-FSE images.