Development and validation of health-oriented personal evaluation for the community-dwelling older person based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International Journal of Older People Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1111/opn.12609
Liang Zhou MD, Chun Feng DPT, Yue Lu MS, Li-Juan Zhong MS, Jing Gao MS, Na Liu MS, Feng Lin MD, PhD, Zhong-Li Jiang MD, PhD
{"title":"Development and validation of health-oriented personal evaluation for the community-dwelling older person based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health","authors":"Liang Zhou MD,&nbsp;Chun Feng DPT,&nbsp;Yue Lu MS,&nbsp;Li-Juan Zhong MS,&nbsp;Jing Gao MS,&nbsp;Na Liu MS,&nbsp;Feng Lin MD, PhD,&nbsp;Zhong-Li Jiang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/opn.12609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) offers a standardized international terminology to operationalize function management across multiple domains, but the summary score of the ICF qualifier scale provides limited information on the comparison of personal abilities and functioning difficulties.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To enhance the interpretative power of the ICF-based Health-oriented Personal Evaluation for the community-dwelling older person (iHOPE-OP) scale through the implementation of the item response theory (IRT) modelling.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional, multi-centre study administrated 161 ICF categories (58 on body functions, 15 on body structures, 60 on activities or participation and 28 on environmental factors) to evaluate the functional level of 338 older citizens (female = 158, male = 180) residing in community or supportive living facilities. The validation process encompassed assessing the IRT model fitness and evaluating the psychometric properties of the IRT-derived iHOPE-OP scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The age of participants ranged from 60 to 94.57, with the mean age of 70. The analysis of non-parametric and parametric models revealed that the three-parameter logistic IRT model, with a dichotomous scoring principle, exhibited the best fit. The 53-item iHOPE-OP scale demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.9729, Guttman's lambda-2 = 0.9749, Molenaar-Sijtsma Statistic = 0.9803, latent class reliability coefficient = 0.9882). There was a good validity between person abilities and the Barthel Index (<i>p</i> &lt; .001, <i>r</i> = .83), as well as instrumental activities of daily living (<i>p</i> &lt; .001, <i>r</i> = .84).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>IRT methods generate the reliable and valid iHOPE-OP scale with the most discriminable and minimal items to represent the older person's functional performance at a comprehensive level. The use of the Wright map can aid in presby-functioning management by visualizing item difficulties and person abilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for practice</h3>\n \n <p>Considering the intricate and heterogeneous health status of older persons, a single functional assessment tool might not fulfil the need to fully understand the multifaceted health status. For use in conjunction with the IRT and ICF framework, the reliable and valid iHOPE-OP scale was developed and can be applied to capture presby-functioning. The Wright map depicts the distribution of item difficulties and person abilities on the same scale that facilitates person-centred goal setting and tailors intervention.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.12609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) offers a standardized international terminology to operationalize function management across multiple domains, but the summary score of the ICF qualifier scale provides limited information on the comparison of personal abilities and functioning difficulties.

Objectives

To enhance the interpretative power of the ICF-based Health-oriented Personal Evaluation for the community-dwelling older person (iHOPE-OP) scale through the implementation of the item response theory (IRT) modelling.

Methods

This cross-sectional, multi-centre study administrated 161 ICF categories (58 on body functions, 15 on body structures, 60 on activities or participation and 28 on environmental factors) to evaluate the functional level of 338 older citizens (female = 158, male = 180) residing in community or supportive living facilities. The validation process encompassed assessing the IRT model fitness and evaluating the psychometric properties of the IRT-derived iHOPE-OP scale.

Results

The age of participants ranged from 60 to 94.57, with the mean age of 70. The analysis of non-parametric and parametric models revealed that the three-parameter logistic IRT model, with a dichotomous scoring principle, exhibited the best fit. The 53-item iHOPE-OP scale demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.9729, Guttman's lambda-2 = 0.9749, Molenaar-Sijtsma Statistic = 0.9803, latent class reliability coefficient = 0.9882). There was a good validity between person abilities and the Barthel Index (p < .001, r = .83), as well as instrumental activities of daily living (p < .001, r = .84).

Conclusions

IRT methods generate the reliable and valid iHOPE-OP scale with the most discriminable and minimal items to represent the older person's functional performance at a comprehensive level. The use of the Wright map can aid in presby-functioning management by visualizing item difficulties and person abilities.

Implications for practice

Considering the intricate and heterogeneous health status of older persons, a single functional assessment tool might not fulfil the need to fully understand the multifaceted health status. For use in conjunction with the IRT and ICF framework, the reliable and valid iHOPE-OP scale was developed and can be applied to capture presby-functioning. The Wright map depicts the distribution of item difficulties and person abilities on the same scale that facilitates person-centred goal setting and tailors intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》,为居住在社区的老年人开发和验证以健康为导向的个人评估方法
背景 《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)提供了一个标准化的国际术语,用于操作多个领域的功能管理,但 ICF 限定量表的总分在比较个人能力和功能困难方面提供的信息有限。 目的 通过实施项目反应理论(IRT)模型,增强基于 ICF 的社区居住老年人健康导向个人评估量表(iHOPE-OP)的解释力。 方法 这项横断面、多中心研究使用了 161 个 ICF 类别(58 个关于身体功能,15 个关于身体结构,60 个关于活动或参与,28 个关于环境因素)来评估 338 名居住在社区或支持性生活设施中的老年人(女性 = 158 人,男性 = 180 人)的功能水平。验证过程包括评估 IRT 模型的适用性以及评估 IRT 衍生的 iHOPE-OP 量表的心理测量特性。 结果 参与者的年龄从 60 岁到 94.57 岁不等,平均年龄为 70 岁。对非参数模型和参数模型的分析表明,采用二分计分原则的三参数逻辑 IRT 模型的拟合效果最好。53 个项目的 iHOPE-OP 量表显示出较高的信度(Cronbach's α = 0.9729,Guttman's lambda-2 = 0.9749,Molenaar-Sijtsma Statistic = 0.9803,潜类信度系数 = 0.9882)。个人能力与巴特尔指数(p < .001, r = .83)以及日常生活工具活动(p < .001, r = .84)之间具有良好的有效性。 结论 IRT 方法产生了可靠有效的 iHOPE-OP 量表,其中的项目最具可辨别性且最少,能够全面反映老年人的功能表现。使用赖特图谱可以直观地显示项目困难和个人能力,从而有助于老花功能管理。 对实践的启示 考虑到老年人复杂多样的健康状况,单一的功能评估工具可能无法满足全面了解老年人多方面健康状况的需要。为了与 IRT 和 ICF 框架结合使用,我们开发了可靠有效的 iHOPE-OP 量表,并可用于捕捉老花功能。Wright 地图描述了同一量表中项目困难和个人能力的分布情况,有助于以人为本地设定目标和进行有针对性的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: International Journal of Older People Nursing welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including research, practice, education, management, and policy. We publish manuscripts that further scholarly inquiry and improve practice through innovation and creativity in all aspects of gerontological nursing. We encourage submission of integrative and systematic reviews; original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; secondary analyses of existing data; historical works; theoretical and conceptual analyses; evidence based practice projects and other practice improvement reports; and policy analyses. All submissions must reflect consideration of IJOPN''s international readership and include explicit perspective on gerontological nursing. We particularly welcome submissions from regions of the world underrepresented in the gerontological nursing literature and from settings and situations not typically addressed in that literature. Editorial perspectives are published in each issue. Editorial perspectives are submitted by invitation only.
期刊最新文献
Impact and Needs in Caregiving for Individuals With Dementia and Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Living in Nursing Homes Improving Nursing Oral Care Practice for Community-Dwelling Care-Dependent Older People Issue Information The Experience of Hospitalisation for People Living With Dementia: A Qualitative Exploration of How Context Shapes Experiences Effects of Tactile Massage in Improving Older Residents' Psychological Health in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Randomised Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1