Correction to “Performance of combination of local exhaust system and floor-supply displacement ventilation system as prevention measure of infection in consulting room”
{"title":"Correction to “Performance of combination of local exhaust system and floor-supply displacement ventilation system as prevention measure of infection in consulting room”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/2475-8876.12444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Yoshihara J, Yamanaka T, Kobayashi T, Choi N, Kobayashi N. Performance of combination of local exhaust system and floor-supply displacement ventilation system as prevention measure of infection in consulting room. Jpn Archit Rev. 2023;6: e12413. https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.12413</p><p>This paper was originally written as an “original paper,” and its classification as a “review paper” is incorrect. Since it was reviewed and accepted as an “original paper” for peer review, this paper should have been classified as an “original paper.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":42793,"journal":{"name":"Japan Architectural Review","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2475-8876.12444","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Architectural Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2475-8876.12444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Yoshihara J, Yamanaka T, Kobayashi T, Choi N, Kobayashi N. Performance of combination of local exhaust system and floor-supply displacement ventilation system as prevention measure of infection in consulting room. Jpn Archit Rev. 2023;6: e12413. https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.12413
This paper was originally written as an “original paper,” and its classification as a “review paper” is incorrect. Since it was reviewed and accepted as an “original paper” for peer review, this paper should have been classified as an “original paper.”