Social pension insurance and household risky asset investment: Evidence from China

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2024.04.001
Jingrong Li , Xinyu Mi , Chenlei Zhang , Yanran Qin
{"title":"Social pension insurance and household risky asset investment: Evidence from China","authors":"Jingrong Li ,&nbsp;Xinyu Mi ,&nbsp;Chenlei Zhang ,&nbsp;Yanran Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using the data from the 2013, 2015, and 2017 waves of the China Household Finance Survey, this paper explores the impact of participation in social pension insurance on household risky asset investment with the time-varying difference-in-difference model. The research findings indicate that, in urban areas, insured households are 2.3% more likely to invest in risky assets compared to uninsured households, and the share invested in risky assets is 0.8% higher. This positive effect is more pronounced for households with a higher level of risk preference. At the same time, there is no significant difference in the probability or proportion of risky assets allocation between insured and uninsured households in rural areas. These findings have important policy implications. When the government reforms the social pension insurance system or allocates public resources in the future, they can consider gradually breaking the dual urban-rural structure in the pension insurance system to alleviate concerns among rural households regarding uncertainties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the data from the 2013, 2015, and 2017 waves of the China Household Finance Survey, this paper explores the impact of participation in social pension insurance on household risky asset investment with the time-varying difference-in-difference model. The research findings indicate that, in urban areas, insured households are 2.3% more likely to invest in risky assets compared to uninsured households, and the share invested in risky assets is 0.8% higher. This positive effect is more pronounced for households with a higher level of risk preference. At the same time, there is no significant difference in the probability or proportion of risky assets allocation between insured and uninsured households in rural areas. These findings have important policy implications. When the government reforms the social pension insurance system or allocates public resources in the future, they can consider gradually breaking the dual urban-rural structure in the pension insurance system to alleviate concerns among rural households regarding uncertainties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会养老保险与家庭风险资产投资:来自中国的证据
本文利用中国家庭金融调查 2013 年、2015 年和 2017 年的数据,采用时变差分模型探讨了参加社会养老保险对家庭风险资产投资的影响。研究结果表明,在城镇地区,与未参保家庭相比,参保家庭投资风险资产的可能性高出 2.3%,投资风险资产的比例高出 0.8%。对于风险偏好水平较高的家庭来说,这种积极影响更为明显。同时,农村地区投保家庭和未投保家庭在风险资产配置的概率或比例上没有显著差异。这些发现具有重要的政策含义。未来政府在改革社会养老保险制度或配置公共资源时,可以考虑逐步打破养老保险制度中的城乡二元结构,以减轻农村家庭对不确定性的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.
期刊最新文献
Monetary policy through the risk-taking channel: Evidence from an emerging market Bank insolvency risk, Z-score measures and unimodal returns: A refinement Can corporate social performance mitigate the risk of extreme stock returns? Are public debt and public debt expectations associated with debt management strategies? Time-frequency co-movement and cross-quantile connectedness of exchange rates: Evidence from ASEAN+3 Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1