Use of portable single-lead electrocardiogram device as an alternative for QTc monitoring in critically ill patients

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1111/anec.13116
Martin Rebolledo-Del Toro MD, Ana Beatriz Carvajalino-Galeano MD, Clarena Pinto-Brito, Oscar Mauricio Muñoz-Velandia MD, MSc, PhD, Ángel Alberto García-Peña MD, MSc, PhD(c), FACC
{"title":"Use of portable single-lead electrocardiogram device as an alternative for QTc monitoring in critically ill patients","authors":"Martin Rebolledo-Del Toro MD,&nbsp;Ana Beatriz Carvajalino-Galeano MD,&nbsp;Clarena Pinto-Brito,&nbsp;Oscar Mauricio Muñoz-Velandia MD, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Ángel Alberto García-Peña MD, MSc, PhD(c), FACC","doi":"10.1111/anec.13116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Acquired QT prolongation is frequent and leads to a higher mortality rate in critically ill patients. KardiaMobile 1L® (KM1L) is a portable, user-friendly single lead, mobile alternative to conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram (12-L ECG) that could be more readily available, potentially facilitating more frequent QTc assessments in intensive care units (ICU); however, there is currently no evidence to validate this potential use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a prospective diagnostic test study comparing QT interval measurement using KM1L with conventional 12-L ECG ordered for any reason in patients admitted to an ICU. We compared the mean difference using a paired <i>t</i>-test, agreement using Bland–Altman analysis, and Lin's concordance coefficient, numerical precision (proportion of QT measurements with &lt;10 ms difference between KM1L and conventional 12-L ECG), and clinical precision (concordance for adequate discrimination of prolonged QTc).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 114 patients (61.4% men, 60% cardiovascular etiology of hospitalization) with 131 12-L ECG traces. We found no statistical difference between corrected QT measurements (427 ms vs. 428 ms, <i>p</i> = .308). Lin's concordance coefficient was 0.848 (95% CI 0.801–0.894, <i>p</i> = .001). Clinical precision was excellent in males and substantial in females (Kappa 0.837 and 0.781, respectively). Numerical precision was lower in patients with vasoactive drugs (−13.99 ms), QT-prolonging drugs (13.84 ms), antiarrhythmic drugs (−12.87 ms), and a heart rate (HR) difference of ≥5 beats per minute (bpm) between devices (−11.26 ms).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our study validates the clinical viability of KM1L, a single-lead mobile ECG device, for identifying prolonged QT intervals in ICU patients. Caution is warranted in patients with certain medical conditions that may affect numerical precision.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8074,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anec.13116","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.13116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Acquired QT prolongation is frequent and leads to a higher mortality rate in critically ill patients. KardiaMobile 1L® (KM1L) is a portable, user-friendly single lead, mobile alternative to conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram (12-L ECG) that could be more readily available, potentially facilitating more frequent QTc assessments in intensive care units (ICU); however, there is currently no evidence to validate this potential use.

Methods

We conducted a prospective diagnostic test study comparing QT interval measurement using KM1L with conventional 12-L ECG ordered for any reason in patients admitted to an ICU. We compared the mean difference using a paired t-test, agreement using Bland–Altman analysis, and Lin's concordance coefficient, numerical precision (proportion of QT measurements with <10 ms difference between KM1L and conventional 12-L ECG), and clinical precision (concordance for adequate discrimination of prolonged QTc).

Results

We included 114 patients (61.4% men, 60% cardiovascular etiology of hospitalization) with 131 12-L ECG traces. We found no statistical difference between corrected QT measurements (427 ms vs. 428 ms, p = .308). Lin's concordance coefficient was 0.848 (95% CI 0.801–0.894, p = .001). Clinical precision was excellent in males and substantial in females (Kappa 0.837 and 0.781, respectively). Numerical precision was lower in patients with vasoactive drugs (−13.99 ms), QT-prolonging drugs (13.84 ms), antiarrhythmic drugs (−12.87 ms), and a heart rate (HR) difference of ≥5 beats per minute (bpm) between devices (−11.26 ms).

Conclusion

Our study validates the clinical viability of KM1L, a single-lead mobile ECG device, for identifying prolonged QT intervals in ICU patients. Caution is warranted in patients with certain medical conditions that may affect numerical precision.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用便携式单导联心电图仪作为重症患者 QTc 监测的替代方法
目的 重症患者经常出现获得性 QT 间期延长,并导致较高的死亡率。KardiaMobile 1L® (KM1L) 是一种便携式、用户友好型单导联移动心电图仪,可替代传统的 12 导联心电图仪(12-L ECG)。 方法 我们进行了一项前瞻性诊断测试研究,比较了使用 KM1L 和传统 12-L 心电图对重症监护室住院患者进行 QT 间期测量的结果。我们使用配对 t 检验比较了平均差异,使用 Bland-Altman 分析比较了一致性,并比较了林氏一致性系数、数字精确度(KM1L 和传统 12-L ECG 之间差异为 <10 ms 的 QT 测量比例)和临床精确度(充分辨别 QTc 延长的一致性)。 结果 我们纳入了 114 名患者(61.4% 为男性,60% 因心血管疾病住院),共 131 份 12-L 心电图描记图。我们发现校正后的 QT 测量值之间没有统计学差异(427 毫秒对 428 毫秒,P = .308)。林氏一致性系数为 0.848 (95% CI 0.801-0.894, p = .001)。男性的临床精确度非常高,而女性的精确度则相当高(Kappa 分别为 0.837 和 0.781)。使用血管活性药物(-13.99 毫秒)、QT 延长药物(13.84 毫秒)、抗心律失常药物(-12.87 毫秒)以及设备间心率(HR)差异≥5 次/分(bpm)(-11.26 毫秒)的患者的数字精确度较低。 结论 我们的研究验证了单导联移动心电图设备 KM1L 在识别 ICU 患者 QT 间期延长方面的临床可行性。对于某些可能会影响数值精度的疾病患者,应谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY (A.N.E) is an online only journal that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. ANE is the first journal in an evolving subspecialty that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. The publication includes topics related to 12-lead, exercise and high-resolution electrocardiography, arrhythmias, ischemia, repolarization phenomena, heart rate variability, circadian rhythms, bioengineering technology, signal-averaged ECGs, T-wave alternans and automatic external defibrillation. ANE publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of noninvasive electrocardiology. Original research, clinical studies, state-of-the-art reviews, case reports, technical notes, and letters to the editors will be published to meet future demands in this field.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Myocardial Fibrosis Detected by CMR in Patients With Idiopathic PVCs Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Premature Contractions Originating From RVOT With Interruption of the Inferior Vena Cava—A Case Report Association Between Different Insulin Resistance Indices and Heart Failure in US Adults With Diabetes Mellitus Coronary Angiographic Features of de Winter Syndrome: More Than Just Occlusion of the Left Anterior Descending Artery Intracardiac Echocardiography and Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Dextrocardia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1