Beyond Industry 4.0 – integrating Lean, digital technologies and people

IF 7.1 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Operations & Production Management Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1108/ijopm-01-2024-0069
Alejandro G. Frank, Matthias Thürer, Moacir Godinho Filho, Giuliano A. Marodin
{"title":"Beyond Industry 4.0 – integrating Lean, digital technologies and people","authors":"Alejandro G. Frank, Matthias Thürer, Moacir Godinho Filho, Giuliano A. Marodin","doi":"10.1108/ijopm-01-2024-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to provide an overall framework that connects and explains a macro-perspective of the findings from the five studies of this special issue. Through this, we aim to answer two main questions: How can Lean and Industry 4.0 be integrated, and what are the outcomes for workers from such integration?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The special issue received 64 papers that were evaluated in multiple stages until this final sample of five papers that describe different facets of the integration between Lean and Industry 4.0 and their relationship with worker activities. In this introduction, we review the main findings of these five studies and propose an integrative view and associated propositions. A discussion provides directions to advance the field further.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The framework shows that when Lean and Industry 4.0 are integrated, companies will face two types of tensions, dialectical and paradoxical, which require different managerial approaches. By managing such tensions, the Lean-Industry 4.0 integration can help improve social performance, as well as develop systematic problem-solving and cumulative learning capabilities. Five important themes for this field of research are outlined: the importance of work routines, legitimation, competence, sense and mental flexibility.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study brings a new theoretical perspective to the integration of Lean with Industry 4.0-related digital technologies. The results go beyond the usual view of improving operational performance and dig into the effects on workers. It also shows that the integration process relies on and can enhance human capabilities such as learning and problem-solving.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":14234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-01-2024-0069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to provide an overall framework that connects and explains a macro-perspective of the findings from the five studies of this special issue. Through this, we aim to answer two main questions: How can Lean and Industry 4.0 be integrated, and what are the outcomes for workers from such integration?

Design/methodology/approach

The special issue received 64 papers that were evaluated in multiple stages until this final sample of five papers that describe different facets of the integration between Lean and Industry 4.0 and their relationship with worker activities. In this introduction, we review the main findings of these five studies and propose an integrative view and associated propositions. A discussion provides directions to advance the field further.

Findings

The framework shows that when Lean and Industry 4.0 are integrated, companies will face two types of tensions, dialectical and paradoxical, which require different managerial approaches. By managing such tensions, the Lean-Industry 4.0 integration can help improve social performance, as well as develop systematic problem-solving and cumulative learning capabilities. Five important themes for this field of research are outlined: the importance of work routines, legitimation, competence, sense and mental flexibility.

Originality/value

This study brings a new theoretical perspective to the integration of Lean with Industry 4.0-related digital technologies. The results go beyond the usual view of improving operational performance and dig into the effects on workers. It also shows that the integration process relies on and can enhance human capabilities such as learning and problem-solving.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越工业 4.0 - 整合精益、数字技术和人才
目的 本研究旨在提供一个整体框架,从宏观角度连接和解释本特刊五项研究的结果。通过这一框架,我们旨在回答两个主要问题:设计/方法/方法本特刊共收到 64 篇论文,经过多个阶段的评估,最终确定了五篇论文样本,这五篇论文描述了精益生产与工业 4.0 融合的不同方面及其与工人活动的关系。在导言中,我们回顾了这五项研究的主要发现,并提出了综合观点和相关命题。研究结果该框架表明,当精益与工业 4.0 相结合时,企业将面临两种类型的紧张关系,即辩证关系和矛盾关系,这需要不同的管理方法。通过管理这种紧张关系,精益与工业 4.0 的整合有助于提高社会绩效,并培养系统的问题解决能力和累积学习能力。本研究概述了这一研究领域的五个重要主题:工作常规的重要性、合法性、能力、感觉和心理灵活性。研究结果超越了提高运营绩效的常规视角,深入探讨了对工人的影响。研究还表明,整合过程依赖于并能够提高人的能力,如学习和解决问题的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
17.20%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The mission of the International Journal of Operations & Production Management (IJOPM) is to publish cutting-edge, innovative research with the potential to significantly advance the field of Operations and Supply Chain Management, both in theory and practice. Drawing on experiences from manufacturing and service sectors, in both private and public contexts, the journal has earned widespread respect in this complex and increasingly vital area of business management. Methodologically, IJOPM encompasses a broad spectrum of empirically-based inquiry using suitable research frameworks, as long as they offer generic insights of substantial value to operations and supply chain management. While the journal does not categorically exclude specific empirical methodologies, it does not accept purely mathematical modeling pieces. Regardless of the chosen mode of inquiry or methods employed, the key criteria are appropriateness of methodology, clarity in the study's execution, and rigor in the application of methods. It's important to note that any contribution should explicitly contribute to theory. The journal actively encourages the use of mixed methods where appropriate and valuable for generating research insights.
期刊最新文献
Is it good to have a choice? The value of participatory order assignments in warehousing The role of digital technologies in configuring circular ecosystems Beyond the new normal for sustainability: transformative operations and supply chain management for negative emissions Impact pathways: putting workers front and center in addressing workforce shortages in intellectual disability care The importance of performance measurement and management in sustainable supply chain governance among SMEs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1