Total hip arthroplasty outcomes in Ehlers-Danlos patients: data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS HIP International Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1177/11207000241234030
Ittai Shichman, Vinaya Rajahraman, Utkarsh Anil, Charles C Lin, Joshua C Rozell, Ran Schwarzkopf
{"title":"Total hip arthroplasty outcomes in Ehlers-Danlos patients: data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System","authors":"Ittai Shichman, Vinaya Rajahraman, Utkarsh Anil, Charles C Lin, Joshua C Rozell, Ran Schwarzkopf","doi":"10.1177/11207000241234030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are genetic connective tissue disorders affecting multiple organ systems that frequently result in connective tissue hyperlaxity and early osteoarthritis. Short- and long-term outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in this patient population remain poorly characterised. The primary purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes and survivorship after primary THA in patients with and without EDS.Methods:The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was queried for all patients undergoing primary elective THA between September 2009 and December 2020. Patients with EDS were identified using ICD9 and ICD10 diagnosis codes. Given the relatively low incidence of EDS in this patient population, the cohort was propensity-matched 1:10 to patients without diagnosis of EDS based on demographics characteristics and medical comorbidities as measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.Results:A total of 66 THA patients with and 660 without EDS were included in each group after 1:10 propensity-matching. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or THA indications. Early postoperative outcomes such as length of hospital stay and discharge disposition were similar. Emergency Room visits and inpatient readmission rates at 3 months postoperatively did not significantly differ between groups. Patients with EDS had a higher overall revision rate compared to those without (15.0% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). Revision free survival after primary THA in patients with EDS was significantly lower than those without EDS at 9-year follow-up. Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated EDS patients had 7-times higher risk of revision (hazard ratio [HR] 7.43; 95% CI, 3.46–16.00; p < 0.001). Lastly, revision due to instability insignificantly trended higher in the EDS cohort (HR 2.29; 95% CI, 0.95–5.49; p = 0.063).Conclusions:EDS patients undergoing primary THA have increased rate of all cause revision and demonstrate decreased revision free survival compared to non-EDS THA patients.","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000241234030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are genetic connective tissue disorders affecting multiple organ systems that frequently result in connective tissue hyperlaxity and early osteoarthritis. Short- and long-term outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in this patient population remain poorly characterised. The primary purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes and survivorship after primary THA in patients with and without EDS.Methods:The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was queried for all patients undergoing primary elective THA between September 2009 and December 2020. Patients with EDS were identified using ICD9 and ICD10 diagnosis codes. Given the relatively low incidence of EDS in this patient population, the cohort was propensity-matched 1:10 to patients without diagnosis of EDS based on demographics characteristics and medical comorbidities as measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.Results:A total of 66 THA patients with and 660 without EDS were included in each group after 1:10 propensity-matching. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or THA indications. Early postoperative outcomes such as length of hospital stay and discharge disposition were similar. Emergency Room visits and inpatient readmission rates at 3 months postoperatively did not significantly differ between groups. Patients with EDS had a higher overall revision rate compared to those without (15.0% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). Revision free survival after primary THA in patients with EDS was significantly lower than those without EDS at 9-year follow-up. Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated EDS patients had 7-times higher risk of revision (hazard ratio [HR] 7.43; 95% CI, 3.46–16.00; p < 0.001). Lastly, revision due to instability insignificantly trended higher in the EDS cohort (HR 2.29; 95% CI, 0.95–5.49; p = 0.063).Conclusions:EDS patients undergoing primary THA have increased rate of all cause revision and demonstrate decreased revision free survival compared to non-EDS THA patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ehlers-Danlos 患者的全髋关节置换术效果:来自全州规划与研究合作系统的数据
导言:埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征(EDS)是一种遗传性结缔组织疾病,影响多个器官系统,经常导致结缔组织过度松弛和早期骨关节炎。对这类患者进行初次全髋关节置换术(THA)后的短期和长期疗效仍缺乏深入研究。本研究的主要目的是比较EDS患者和非EDS患者接受初级全髋关节置换术(THA)后的术后效果和存活率。方法:在纽约全州规划与研究合作系统(SPARCS)数据库中查询了2009年9月至2020年12月期间接受初级选择性THA手术的所有患者。通过 ICD9 和 ICD10 诊断代码确定了 EDS 患者。鉴于EDS在这一患者群体中的发病率相对较低,根据人口统计学特征和以Elixhauser合并症指数衡量的医疗合并症,按1:10的倾向与未确诊EDS的患者进行匹配。结果:经过1:10的倾向匹配后,每组中分别有66名EDS患者和660名未确诊EDS的THA患者。两组患者的基线特征和THA适应症无明显差异。术后早期结果(如住院时间和出院处置)相似。两组患者术后3个月的急诊就诊率和住院再入院率没有显著差异。与无EDS的患者相比,EDS患者的总体翻修率较高(15.0% vs. 3.2%,p < 0.001)。在9年的随访中,EDS患者初次THA后的无翻修存活率明显低于未患EDS的患者。Cox比例危险回归显示,EDS患者的翻修风险比无EDS患者高出7倍(危险比[HR]7.43;95% CI,3.46-16.00;p < 0.001)。结论:与非EDS THA患者相比,接受初级THA的EDS患者各种原因的翻修率增加,无翻修生存率下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
期刊最新文献
A prospective multicentre study of 82 prosthetic joint infections treated with a standardised debridement and implant retention (DAIR) protocol followed by 6 weeks of antimicrobial therapy: favourable results. Hounsfield unit values are useful for predicting early outcomes after acetabular fractures: a retrospective study. Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 35 years: a systematic review of the last 2 decades studies. Patients with multiple sclerosis have higher rates of worsening following total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched analysis. A multicentre prospective assessment of the utility of robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty with virtual range of motion on intraoperative implant positioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1