Autologous platelet concentrate in epiretinal membrane surgery: A single‐centre prospective comparative non‐inferiority study

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Acta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1111/aos.16690
Olga Furashova, Bartlomiej Adrianowicz, Katrin Engelmann
{"title":"Autologous platelet concentrate in epiretinal membrane surgery: A single‐centre prospective comparative non‐inferiority study","authors":"Olga Furashova, Bartlomiej Adrianowicz, Katrin Engelmann","doi":"10.1111/aos.16690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of the study was to compare the anatomical and functional results including reading ability after epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery in patients with and without the use of autologous platelet concentrate (APC).Methods<jats:italic>Design</jats:italic>: Prospective, comparative non‐inferiority series. <jats:italic>Setting</jats:italic>: Institutional. <jats:italic>Patients</jats:italic>: 51 eyes of 51 patients, who underwent pars‐plana vitrectomy (PPV) for ERM surgery. 29 eyes additionally received intraoperative APC, 22 eyes underwent standard procedure without APC use. <jats:italic>Observations</jats:italic>: anatomical and functional outcome parameters (central retinal thickness (CRT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reading ability (RA)) were compared between the two groups at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Subjective assessment of visual acuity and reading ability was also analysed. <jats:italic>Main outcome measures</jats:italic>: BCVA, RA and CRT.ResultsBoth groups showed significant CRT reduction and RA improvement, while BCVA improvement was significant only in eyes with intraoperative APC use during the follow‐up time of 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference between CRT reduction, BCVA and RA improvement between the groups.ConclusionIntraoperative APC use for ERM surgery results in similar anatomical and functional outcomes compared with standard ERM surgery without APC use.","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"194-196 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to compare the anatomical and functional results including reading ability after epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery in patients with and without the use of autologous platelet concentrate (APC).MethodsDesign: Prospective, comparative non‐inferiority series. Setting: Institutional. Patients: 51 eyes of 51 patients, who underwent pars‐plana vitrectomy (PPV) for ERM surgery. 29 eyes additionally received intraoperative APC, 22 eyes underwent standard procedure without APC use. Observations: anatomical and functional outcome parameters (central retinal thickness (CRT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reading ability (RA)) were compared between the two groups at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Subjective assessment of visual acuity and reading ability was also analysed. Main outcome measures: BCVA, RA and CRT.ResultsBoth groups showed significant CRT reduction and RA improvement, while BCVA improvement was significant only in eyes with intraoperative APC use during the follow‐up time of 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference between CRT reduction, BCVA and RA improvement between the groups.ConclusionIntraoperative APC use for ERM surgery results in similar anatomical and functional outcomes compared with standard ERM surgery without APC use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自体血小板浓缩物在视网膜外膜手术中的应用:单中心前瞻性非劣效性比较研究
研究目的:比较使用和未使用自体血小板浓缩物(APC)的视网膜外膜(ERM)患者手术后的解剖和功能效果,包括阅读能力:前瞻性、对比性非劣效性系列研究。设置:机构。患者:51名患者的51只眼睛接受了玻璃体旁切除术(PPV)以进行ERM手术。其中 29 眼在术中额外接受了 APC,22 眼接受了标准手术,未使用 APC。观察结果:比较了两组患者术后 6 周和 6 个月的解剖和功能结果参数(视网膜中央厚度 (CRT)、最佳矫正视力 (BCVA) 和阅读能力 (RA))。此外,还对视力和阅读能力的主观评估进行了分析。主要结果指标:结果两组的 CRT 和 RA 均显著降低,而 BCVA 的改善仅在术中使用了 APC 的随访 6 个月期间显著。结论与不使用 APC 的标准 ERM 手术相比,术中使用 APC 的 ERM 手术具有相似的解剖和功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of intravitreal faricimab therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The ever ongoing cosmetic quest to change eye colour. Slowing myopia progression with cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE) spectacle lenses-Year 1 results from a 2-year prospective, multi-centre trial. Correlation of retinal fluid and photoreceptor and RPE loss in neovascular AMD by automated quantification, a real-world FRB! analysis. Incidence, risk factors, and patient characteristics in severe contact lens-related microbial keratitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1