Evolving Licensure Examination: Assessing Student Confidence and Accuracy With Next Generation NCLEX

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Education Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20240207-10
Ashley Helvig Coombe, PhD, RN, CNE, LisaMarie Wands, PhD, RN, CHSE-A, CNE, Shannon Stevenson, EdD, MSN, RNC-OB, RNC-MNN, CNE, Rowena W. Elliott, PhD, RN, CNN, AGNP-C, GS-C, CNE, LNC, ANEF, FAAN
{"title":"Evolving Licensure Examination: Assessing Student Confidence and Accuracy With Next Generation NCLEX","authors":"Ashley Helvig Coombe, PhD, RN, CNE, LisaMarie Wands, PhD, RN, CHSE-A, CNE, Shannon Stevenson, EdD, MSN, RNC-OB, RNC-MNN, CNE, Rowena W. Elliott, PhD, RN, CNN, AGNP-C, GS-C, CNE, LNC, ANEF, FAAN","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240207-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<section><h3>Background:</h3><p>The Next Generation NCLEX (NGN) includes new item types. Little is known about nursing students' confidence and accuracy in answering these questions.</p></section><section><h3>Method:</h3><p>A descriptive comparative study examined prelicensure nursing students' confidence and accuracy in answering NGN-style items versus multiple-choice questions (MCQs) of the same content via a 12-item quiz.</p></section><section><h3>Results:</h3><p>Less than one third of students (<i>n</i> = 194; 32.1%) reported feeling confident in answering NGN questions. Students' confidence levels had no relationship on scores with NGN items. When comparing NGN-style items to MCQs, students' (<i>n</i> = 221) scores on NGN-style items were lower with bowtie or a select-all-that-apply questions but higher with highlight table or matrix multiple-choice questions.</p></section><section><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Students' lack of confidence with certain item types suggests faculty should incorporate these item types into classroom activities or course assignments. NGN test-taking strategies also should be incorporated and frequently reinforced throughout the curriculum. <strong>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(4):252–255.]</strong></p></section>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240207-10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

The Next Generation NCLEX (NGN) includes new item types. Little is known about nursing students' confidence and accuracy in answering these questions.

Method:

A descriptive comparative study examined prelicensure nursing students' confidence and accuracy in answering NGN-style items versus multiple-choice questions (MCQs) of the same content via a 12-item quiz.

Results:

Less than one third of students (n = 194; 32.1%) reported feeling confident in answering NGN questions. Students' confidence levels had no relationship on scores with NGN items. When comparing NGN-style items to MCQs, students' (n = 221) scores on NGN-style items were lower with bowtie or a select-all-that-apply questions but higher with highlight table or matrix multiple-choice questions.

Conclusion:

Students' lack of confidence with certain item types suggests faculty should incorporate these item types into classroom activities or course assignments. NGN test-taking strategies also should be incorporated and frequently reinforced throughout the curriculum. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(4):252–255.]

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不断发展的执照考试:评估学生对下一代 NCLEX 的信心和准确性
背景:下一代NCLEX(NGN)包括新的题目类型。方法:一项描述性比较研究通过 12 个项目的测验,考察了执照前护理专业学生在回答 NGN 类型项目与相同内容的多项选择题(MCQ)时的信心和准确性。学生的自信水平与 NGN 题目的得分没有关系。当将 NGN 类型的题目与 MCQs 进行比较时,学生(n = 221)在 NGN 类型题目上的得分在蝴蝶结或 "全选 "问题上较低,但在高亮表格或矩阵选择题上较高。此外,还应在整个课程中纳入并经常强化 NGN 考试策略。[J Nurs Educ.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the Power of NursingTM on Classroom Connectedness. Unveiling the SChematic Organization of Pharmacological Information for Nurses: A New Approach to Pharmacology Education for Nurses. Simulation Experiences Focusing on Addressing Culturally Based Hidden Bias and RacisM (A-CHARM). Simulation Expert Modeling to Teach Sensitive Screening in Nursing Education. Incorporating Social Needs Screening in Simulation for Family Nurse Practitioner Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1