An overview of waste in the context of Islamic economics and heterodox approaches: on common discourses

Ekrem Yilmaz
{"title":"An overview of waste in the context of Islamic economics and heterodox approaches: on common discourses","authors":"Ekrem Yilmaz","doi":"10.1108/ijoes-08-2023-0177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to investigate the viewpoints of heterodox economic thoughts and Islamic economic thought concerning the concept of waste. Additionally, it explores the shared criticisms that both perspectives hold against mainstream economic thought in relation to waste.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>First of all, the concept of waste is examined and the global effects of waste are investigated. Criticisms directed in the context of waste in mainstream economics in the context of heterodox school thoughts are examined. Likewise, criticisms directed in the context of waste in mainstream economics in the context of Islamic economic thoughts are examined. Finally, the common and different aspects of heterodox and Islamic economic thoughts were discussed, and the common criticisms of mainstream economic thought’s point of view toward waste were examined. This study is a theoretical, qualitative study.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Although both ideas have different aspects, heterodox and Islamic economic thoughts believe that the mainstream economy, which is based on capitalism and materialism, creates waste by ignoring the long-term social and environmental consequences of economic activity. They argue that the pursuit of profits and growth, without considering the impact on society and the environment, leads to an inefficient and unsustainable use of resources.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The best author’s knowledge, by emphasizing the common and different aspects of Islamic economics and heterodox thoughts, this study is the first to examine the concept of waste in the context of the common aspects of these ideas.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":42832,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ethics and Systems","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ethics and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-08-2023-0177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the viewpoints of heterodox economic thoughts and Islamic economic thought concerning the concept of waste. Additionally, it explores the shared criticisms that both perspectives hold against mainstream economic thought in relation to waste.

Design/methodology/approach

First of all, the concept of waste is examined and the global effects of waste are investigated. Criticisms directed in the context of waste in mainstream economics in the context of heterodox school thoughts are examined. Likewise, criticisms directed in the context of waste in mainstream economics in the context of Islamic economic thoughts are examined. Finally, the common and different aspects of heterodox and Islamic economic thoughts were discussed, and the common criticisms of mainstream economic thought’s point of view toward waste were examined. This study is a theoretical, qualitative study.

Findings

Although both ideas have different aspects, heterodox and Islamic economic thoughts believe that the mainstream economy, which is based on capitalism and materialism, creates waste by ignoring the long-term social and environmental consequences of economic activity. They argue that the pursuit of profits and growth, without considering the impact on society and the environment, leads to an inefficient and unsustainable use of resources.

Originality/value

The best author’s knowledge, by emphasizing the common and different aspects of Islamic economics and heterodox thoughts, this study is the first to examine the concept of waste in the context of the common aspects of these ideas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰经济学和异端方法背景下的废物概述:关于共同的论述
目的 本研究旨在探讨异端经济思想和伊斯兰经济思想关于废物概念的观点。首先,研究了浪费的概念,并调查了浪费的全球影响。在异端学派思想的背景下,对主流经济学中有关浪费的批评进行了研究。同样,还研究了在伊斯兰经济思想背景下对主流经济学中浪费现象的批评。最后,讨论了异端经济思想和伊斯兰经济思想的共同点和不同点,并研究了主流经济思想对浪费观点的共同批评。本研究是一项理论性、定性研究。研究结果尽管两种思想都有不同的方面,但异端经济思想和伊斯兰经济思想都认为,以资本主义和物质主义为基础的主流经济忽视了经济活动对社会和环境的长期影响,从而造成了浪费。他们认为,一味追求利润和增长,而不考虑对社会和环境的影响,会导致资源的低效和不可持续利用。原创性/价值据作者所知,本研究通过强调伊斯兰经济学和异端思想的共同点和不同点,首次从这些思想的共同点出发研究了浪费的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Ethics and Systems (formerly named Humanomics, the International Journal of Systems and Ethics) is a multidisciplinary journal publishing peer review research on issues of ethics and morality affecting socio-scientific systems in epistemological perspectives. The journal covers diverse areas of a socio-scientific nature. The focus is on disseminating the theory and practice of morality and ethics as a system-oriented study defined by inter-causality between critical variables of given problems.
期刊最新文献
Whistleblowing intentions of external auditors: an application of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory Relational business model for shared responsibility The impact of external debt stock on economic growth: ethical dilemmas and evidence from East African community bloc Overcoming organizational politics and unlocking meaningful work through ethical leadership Ethical mindset and the efficacy of tax ethical awareness initiatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1