Rates of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation and its impact on outcomes among females and males

Ruina Zhang, Kabir V. Malkani, James K. Gabriels, Elizabeth Reznik, Han A. Li, Ari G. Mandler, Veronica Qu, James E. Ip, George Thomas, Christopher F. Liu, Steven M. Markowitz, Bruce B Lerman, Jim W. Cheung
{"title":"Rates of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation and its impact on outcomes among females and males","authors":"Ruina Zhang, Kabir V. Malkani, James K. Gabriels, Elizabeth Reznik, Han A. Li, Ari G. Mandler, Veronica Qu, James E. Ip, George Thomas, Christopher F. Liu, Steven M. Markowitz, Bruce B Lerman, Jim W. Cheung","doi":"10.1111/pace.14984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundSeveral studies have demonstrated that females have a higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF). There are limited data on sex‐based differences in PV reconnection rates at repeat ablation. We aimed to investigate sex‐based differences in electrophysiological findings and atrial arrhythmia recurrence after repeat AF ablationMethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 161 consecutive patients (32% female, age 65 ± 10 years) who underwent repeat AF ablation after index PV isolation between 2010 and 2022. Demographics, procedural characteristics and follow‐up data were collected. Recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT)/AF was defined as any atrial arrhythmia ≥30 s in duration.ResultsCompared to males, females tended to be older and had a significantly higher prevalence of prior valve surgery (10 vs. 2%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .03). At repeat ablation, PV reconnection was found in 119 (74%) patients. Males were more likely to have PV reconnection at repeat ablation compared to females (81 vs. 59%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .004). Excluding repeat PV isolation, there were no significant differences in adjunctive ablation strategies performed at repeat ablation between females and males. During follow‐up, there were no significant differences in freedom from AT/AF recurrence between females and males after repeat ablation (63 vs. 59% at 2 years, respectively; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .48).ConclusionsAfter initial PV isolation, significantly fewer females have evidence of PV reconnection at the time of repeat ablation for recurrent AF. Despite this difference, long‐term freedom from AT/AF was similar between females and males after repeat ablation.","PeriodicalId":19650,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSeveral studies have demonstrated that females have a higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF). There are limited data on sex‐based differences in PV reconnection rates at repeat ablation. We aimed to investigate sex‐based differences in electrophysiological findings and atrial arrhythmia recurrence after repeat AF ablationMethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 161 consecutive patients (32% female, age 65 ± 10 years) who underwent repeat AF ablation after index PV isolation between 2010 and 2022. Demographics, procedural characteristics and follow‐up data were collected. Recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT)/AF was defined as any atrial arrhythmia ≥30 s in duration.ResultsCompared to males, females tended to be older and had a significantly higher prevalence of prior valve surgery (10 vs. 2%; P = .03). At repeat ablation, PV reconnection was found in 119 (74%) patients. Males were more likely to have PV reconnection at repeat ablation compared to females (81 vs. 59%; P = .004). Excluding repeat PV isolation, there were no significant differences in adjunctive ablation strategies performed at repeat ablation between females and males. During follow‐up, there were no significant differences in freedom from AT/AF recurrence between females and males after repeat ablation (63 vs. 59% at 2 years, respectively; P = .48).ConclusionsAfter initial PV isolation, significantly fewer females have evidence of PV reconnection at the time of repeat ablation for recurrent AF. Despite this difference, long‐term freedom from AT/AF was similar between females and males after repeat ablation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性心房颤动重复消融术的肺静脉再连接率及其对女性和男性治疗效果的影响
背景多项研究表明,女性在肺静脉(PV)隔离治疗房颤(AF)后心律失常复发的风险较高。关于重复消融时肺静脉再连接率的性别差异的数据很有限。我们旨在研究重复房颤消融术后电生理检查结果和房性心律失常复发的性别差异。 我们对 2010 年至 2022 年间在指数 PV 隔离术后接受重复房颤消融术的 161 例连续患者(32% 为女性,年龄为 65 ± 10 岁)进行了回顾性研究。研究收集了患者的人口统计学特征、手术特征和随访数据。复发性房性心动过速(AT)/房颤定义为持续时间≥30 秒的任何房性心律失常。结果与男性相比,女性的年龄更大,之前接受过瓣膜手术的比例明显更高(10 vs. 2%; P = .03)。在重复消融时,119 名患者(74%)发现了 PV 重接。与女性相比,男性在重复消融时更有可能出现 PV 重接(81% 对 59%;P = .004)。除重复 PV 隔离外,女性和男性在重复消融时采用的辅助消融策略没有显著差异。在随访期间,女性和男性在重复消融后免于 AT/AF 复发的比例没有明显差异(2 年时分别为 63% 和 59%;P = .48)。尽管存在这种差异,但女性和男性在重复消融术后长期免于 AT/AF 的比例相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Device programing and SMART pass algorithm activation in subcutaneous implantable defibrillator patients: Data from a remote monitoring database A validation study of the accuracy of the atrial pace map assessed with intracardiac pattern matching: Potential utility of non‐pulmonary vein mapping Historical discrepancies in transcutaneous pacing trials: A call to overcome false electrical capture A slightly irregular SVT: What is the mechanism? Risk factors for tachycardia‐induced cardiomyopathy due to atrial fibrillation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1