Lucas Alves Jaques, Pedro Rafael Rocha Stermer, Ana Karoline Brito de Oliveira, Vera Regina Fernandes da Silva Marães, Raquel Henriques Jácomo, Aline Teixeira Alves, Katiane da Costa Cunha, Marianne Lucena da Silva
{"title":"Autonomic modulation of heart rate during physical activity in pregnant women: A systematic review of literature","authors":"Lucas Alves Jaques, Pedro Rafael Rocha Stermer, Ana Karoline Brito de Oliveira, Vera Regina Fernandes da Silva Marães, Raquel Henriques Jácomo, Aline Teixeira Alves, Katiane da Costa Cunha, Marianne Lucena da Silva","doi":"10.1111/pace.14976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThere are important physiological changes in the heart rate autonomic modulation in pregnant women and these changes may affect the way their bodies respond to exercise stimulus. The objective of this review is to verify the physical exercise influence on autonomic modulation of heart rate in pregnant women.MethodsThis study is a Systematic Review. The electronic databases used to search for the studies were Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via PUBMED, Regional Health Portal and EMBASE. Experimental studies that evaluated heart‐rate variability in pregnant women practicing physical exercises were included. And articles that addressed only fetal heart‐rate variability, case reports, congress abstracts, clinical trial protocols without results, preprints, and gray literature were excluded. There were no language or publication year restrictions. The descriptors used in the Search were Cardiac Chronotropism, Sympathetic Nervous System, Pregnancy, and Physical Exercise. For statistical analysis, the fixed effect model was used.ResultsA total of 3106 articles were found, and 12 studies were included, which 5 were nonrandomized clinical trials, 4 were randomized clinical trials, and 3 were cross‐sectional studies. Three hundred and four pregnant women were included in the studies. The application of physical exercise was varied, but in general they used aerobic exercises and with increased variability of the heart rate and reflex on the autonomic modulation of heart rate.ConclusionMost studies demonstrate benefits heart rate in pregnant women, but limited research makes it hard to compare specific types of exercise and larger studies are needed to identify the best exercise.","PeriodicalId":19650,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":"162 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThere are important physiological changes in the heart rate autonomic modulation in pregnant women and these changes may affect the way their bodies respond to exercise stimulus. The objective of this review is to verify the physical exercise influence on autonomic modulation of heart rate in pregnant women.MethodsThis study is a Systematic Review. The electronic databases used to search for the studies were Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via PUBMED, Regional Health Portal and EMBASE. Experimental studies that evaluated heart‐rate variability in pregnant women practicing physical exercises were included. And articles that addressed only fetal heart‐rate variability, case reports, congress abstracts, clinical trial protocols without results, preprints, and gray literature were excluded. There were no language or publication year restrictions. The descriptors used in the Search were Cardiac Chronotropism, Sympathetic Nervous System, Pregnancy, and Physical Exercise. For statistical analysis, the fixed effect model was used.ResultsA total of 3106 articles were found, and 12 studies were included, which 5 were nonrandomized clinical trials, 4 were randomized clinical trials, and 3 were cross‐sectional studies. Three hundred and four pregnant women were included in the studies. The application of physical exercise was varied, but in general they used aerobic exercises and with increased variability of the heart rate and reflex on the autonomic modulation of heart rate.ConclusionMost studies demonstrate benefits heart rate in pregnant women, but limited research makes it hard to compare specific types of exercise and larger studies are needed to identify the best exercise.