Simple reflection exercises can build efficacy and reduce distress about relationship conflicts

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q2 COMMUNICATION PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1111/pere.12545
Emily M. Britton, Denise C. Marigold, Ian McGregor
{"title":"Simple reflection exercises can build efficacy and reduce distress about relationship conflicts","authors":"Emily M. Britton, Denise C. Marigold, Ian McGregor","doi":"10.1111/pere.12545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Serious conflicts in close personal relationships can be highly distressing and tempting to ignore, but avoidance of conflict is maladaptive. In the present research, we tested the effectiveness of short conflict‐reflection interventions to promote constructive engagement with conflicts. In Study 1 (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 358), a relatively unstructured, conflicted‐reflection intervention significantly reduced distress and bolstered confidence in partners' ability to resolve their relationship conflicts. Study 2 (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 411) further revealed that this intervention was as, or nearly as effective as more elaborate interventions that prescribed specific, theory‐based, therapeutic elements. Together, results reveal that even brief episodes of constructive reflection on relationship conflicts can improve confidence and reduce distress about them. The positive effects of a relatively unstructured reflection suggest people already have adaptive intuitions about how to more effectively manage conflicts in their relationships and can benefit from brief reflections on how to apply them.","PeriodicalId":48077,"journal":{"name":"PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serious conflicts in close personal relationships can be highly distressing and tempting to ignore, but avoidance of conflict is maladaptive. In the present research, we tested the effectiveness of short conflict‐reflection interventions to promote constructive engagement with conflicts. In Study 1 (N = 358), a relatively unstructured, conflicted‐reflection intervention significantly reduced distress and bolstered confidence in partners' ability to resolve their relationship conflicts. Study 2 (N = 411) further revealed that this intervention was as, or nearly as effective as more elaborate interventions that prescribed specific, theory‐based, therapeutic elements. Together, results reveal that even brief episodes of constructive reflection on relationship conflicts can improve confidence and reduce distress about them. The positive effects of a relatively unstructured reflection suggest people already have adaptive intuitions about how to more effectively manage conflicts in their relationships and can benefit from brief reflections on how to apply them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简单的反思练习可以提高效能,减少人际关系冲突带来的困扰
在亲密的人际关系中,严重的冲突会给人带来极大的痛苦,很容易被忽视,但回避冲突是不适应的。在本研究中,我们测试了短期冲突反思干预对促进建设性参与冲突的有效性。在研究 1(N = 358)中,一个相对非结构化的冲突反思干预显著减少了困扰,并增强了伴侣对解决关系冲突能力的信心。研究 2(N = 411)进一步显示,这种干预与规定了具体的、以理论为基础的治疗要素的更复杂的干预一样有效,或者几乎同样有效。总之,研究结果表明,即使是对关系冲突进行简短的建设性反思,也能增强人们的信心,减少对关系冲突的困扰。相对无序的反思所产生的积极效果表明,人们对于如何更有效地处理人际关系中的冲突已经有了适应性直觉,并能从如何应用这些直觉的简短反思中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Personal Relationships, first published in 1994, is an international, interdisciplinary journal that promotes scholarship in the field of personal relationships using a wide variety of methodologies and throughout a broad range of disciplines, including psychology, sociology, communication studies, anthropology, family studies, child development, social work, and gerontology. The subject matter and approach of Personal Relationships will be of interest to researchers, teachers, and practitioners. Manuscripts examining a wide range of personal relationships, including those between romantic or intimate partners, spouses, parents and children, siblings, classmates, coworkers, neighbors, and friends are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Constructing the meaning of human–AI romantic relationships from the perspectives of users dating the social chatbot Replika Self‐concept clarity and the evaluation and selection of incompatible dating partners Emerging adult perceptions of costs and benefits of using information and communication technology in dating relationships Relationship sustainability: Exploring the idea of sustainable marriages among Indian married couples “I did not expect that from you!”: Unforgiveness dimensions, attachment insecurities, and relationship under‐commitment following a relational transgression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1