What’s the use of educational research? Six stories reflecting on research use with communities

Sophie Rudolph, Eve Mayes, Tebeje Molla, Sophie Chiew, Natasha Abhayawickrama, Netta Maiava, Danielle Villafana, Rosie Welch, Ben Liu, Rachel Couper, Iris Duhn, Al Fricker, Archie Thomas, Menasik Dewanyang, Hayley McQuire, Sophie Hashimoto-Benfatto, Michelle Spisbah, Zach Smith, Tarneen Onus-Browne, Emma Rowe, Joel Windle, Fazal Rizvi
{"title":"What’s the use of educational research? Six stories reflecting on research use with communities","authors":"Sophie Rudolph, Eve Mayes, Tebeje Molla, Sophie Chiew, Natasha Abhayawickrama, Netta Maiava, Danielle Villafana, Rosie Welch, Ben Liu, Rachel Couper, Iris Duhn, Al Fricker, Archie Thomas, Menasik Dewanyang, Hayley McQuire, Sophie Hashimoto-Benfatto, Michelle Spisbah, Zach Smith, Tarneen Onus-Browne, Emma Rowe, Joel Windle, Fazal Rizvi","doi":"10.1007/s13384-024-00693-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The question of how education research can be ‘useful’ is an enduring and challenging one. In recent years, this question has been approached by universities through a widespread ‘impact’ agenda. In this article, we explore the tensions between usefulness and impact and present six stories that reflect on research use with communities. These stories engage issues of the risk of usefulness, the time that is needed to work collaboratively for research usefulness, whether theories developed in universities can be useful to communities for understanding the problems they face, who has the power to steer research to serve their purposes, and how community collective action can enhance the usefulness of research. The article concludes with a section that reflects on the importance of continuing to engage with the debates about research use in often highly commercially oriented university environments. This article brings together diverse voices that wrestle with the politics of research use beyond the neat, linear narratives of change that impact agendas tend to portray. These illustrations of the ethical dilemmas encountered through navigating research use with communities contribute to an ongoing conversation about refusing capitalist and colonialist logics of research extraction while working within institutions often driven by such logics.</p>","PeriodicalId":501129,"journal":{"name":"The Australian Educational Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian Educational Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00693-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of how education research can be ‘useful’ is an enduring and challenging one. In recent years, this question has been approached by universities through a widespread ‘impact’ agenda. In this article, we explore the tensions between usefulness and impact and present six stories that reflect on research use with communities. These stories engage issues of the risk of usefulness, the time that is needed to work collaboratively for research usefulness, whether theories developed in universities can be useful to communities for understanding the problems they face, who has the power to steer research to serve their purposes, and how community collective action can enhance the usefulness of research. The article concludes with a section that reflects on the importance of continuing to engage with the debates about research use in often highly commercially oriented university environments. This article brings together diverse voices that wrestle with the politics of research use beyond the neat, linear narratives of change that impact agendas tend to portray. These illustrations of the ethical dilemmas encountered through navigating research use with communities contribute to an ongoing conversation about refusing capitalist and colonialist logics of research extraction while working within institutions often driven by such logics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育研究有什么用?反映社区使用研究成果的六个故事
教育研究如何才能 "有用",这是一个具有挑战性的持久问题。近年来,大学通过广泛的 "影响 "议程来解决这一问题。在本文中,我们探讨了有用性与影响力之间的矛盾,并介绍了六个反映社区使用研究成果的故事。这些故事涉及以下问题:有用性的风险、为实现研究有用性而开展合作所需的时间、大学开发的理论是否有助于社区了解其所面临的问题、谁有权引导研究为其目的服务,以及社区集体行动如何提高研究的有用性。文章最后用一个章节反思了在通常高度商业化的大学环境中继续参与有关研究用途的辩论的重要性。这篇文章汇集了不同的声音,这些声音与研究使用的政治性进行了斗争,超越了影响议程倾向于描绘的整齐、线性的变革叙事。这些例子说明了在与社区共同利用研究成果的过程中遇到的道德困境,有助于我们继续讨论如何拒绝资本主义和殖民主义的研究成果提取逻辑,同时在往往受这种逻辑驱动的机构中开展工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The interplay of context and need: unravelling the interwoven threads of teachers’ professional learning/development The roles of AI and educational leaders in AI-assisted administrative decision-making: a proposed framework for symbiotic collaboration Teacher produced video tours of classrooms: what matters for their teaching of writing? Addressing the hidden labour of mentoring preservice teachers Responding to children’s voices: the new frontier in education policy reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1