Effectiveness of stress management interventions for nursing students: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING Nursing & Health Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1111/nhs.13113
Xuan Ji, Xiaoyan Guo, Kim Lam Soh, Salimah Japar, Liping He
{"title":"Effectiveness of stress management interventions for nursing students: A systematic review and meta‐analysis","authors":"Xuan Ji, Xiaoyan Guo, Kim Lam Soh, Salimah Japar, Liping He","doi":"10.1111/nhs.13113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elevated stress levels are related to diminished mental health, potentially leading to decreased well‐being and performance of nursing students. While researchers have focused on developing stress management interventions, there is a need to synthesize the evidence. A systematic review with meta‐analysis was conducted to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of stress management interventions in nursing students. A systematic literature search identified controlled stress management interventions employing a validated psychological or physiological stress measure. Forty‐one studies were included, with 36 forming a pool of 2715 participants in the meta‐analysis. The overall effect on psychological stress was positive. Intervention type, delivery modality, intervention duration in weeks, and number of sessions were moderators of intervention effectiveness, with more significant effects for mind–body programs, on‐site delivery methods, durations of 9–12 weeks, and 15–30 sessions. For physiological stress, the biomarkers of blood pressure, heart rate, and cortisol levels decreased significantly. Future research is necessary for promising outcomes related to currently underrepresented indicators and to investigate the long‐term effects of interventions.","PeriodicalId":49730,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.13113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elevated stress levels are related to diminished mental health, potentially leading to decreased well‐being and performance of nursing students. While researchers have focused on developing stress management interventions, there is a need to synthesize the evidence. A systematic review with meta‐analysis was conducted to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of stress management interventions in nursing students. A systematic literature search identified controlled stress management interventions employing a validated psychological or physiological stress measure. Forty‐one studies were included, with 36 forming a pool of 2715 participants in the meta‐analysis. The overall effect on psychological stress was positive. Intervention type, delivery modality, intervention duration in weeks, and number of sessions were moderators of intervention effectiveness, with more significant effects for mind–body programs, on‐site delivery methods, durations of 9–12 weeks, and 15–30 sessions. For physiological stress, the biomarkers of blood pressure, heart rate, and cortisol levels decreased significantly. Future research is necessary for promising outcomes related to currently underrepresented indicators and to investigate the long‐term effects of interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业学生压力管理干预措施的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
压力水平的升高与心理健康水平的降低有关,可能会导致护理专业学生的幸福感和学习成绩下降。虽然研究人员一直致力于开发压力管理干预措施,但仍有必要对证据进行综合分析。为了评估压力管理干预措施对护理专业学生的有效性,我们进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析。通过系统性文献检索,确定了采用有效心理或生理压力测量方法的受控压力管理干预措施。共纳入了 41 项研究,其中 36 项形成了一个包含 2715 名参与者的荟萃分析库。对心理压力的总体影响是积极的。干预类型、实施方式、干预持续时间(以周为单位)和疗程次数是干预效果的调节因素,其中身心项目、现场实施方法、持续时间为 9-12 周和 15-30 次疗程的干预效果更为显著。在生理压力方面,血压、心率和皮质醇水平等生物标志物均显著下降。未来的研究对于目前代表性不足的指标的预期结果以及调查干预措施的长期效果非常必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NHS has a multidisciplinary focus and broad scope and a particular focus on the translation of research into clinical practice, inter-disciplinary and multidisciplinary work, primary health care, health promotion, health education, management of communicable and non-communicable diseases, implementation of technological innovations and inclusive multicultural approaches to health services and care.
期刊最新文献
Current Status and Factors Influencing Mental Health Literacy in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study. Hope experiences in pregnant women after artificial reproduction technology: Becoming a mother. "Jumping on the Blood Pressure Bandwagon": Nurse, GP, and Patient Perspectives of a General Practice Nurse-Led Hypertension Management Intervention. Exploring the Utility of a Novel Approach of Evaluating Application of a Validated Violence Risk Assessment Instrument. "Aging Amplifies Challenges": A Descriptive Phenomenological Exploration of the Lived Experiences and Needs of Elderly Individuals With Schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1