Professional approach to the care of women who have suffered a perinatal loss

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING Nursing & Health Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1111/nhs.13116
Ana Rubio‐Alvarez, Carmen Jiménez‐Ramos, Carolina Bravo‐Vaquero, Beatriz Pulgarín‐Pulgarín, Julián Rodríguez‐Almagro, Antonio Hernández‐Martínez
{"title":"Professional approach to the care of women who have suffered a perinatal loss","authors":"Ana Rubio‐Alvarez, Carmen Jiménez‐Ramos, Carolina Bravo‐Vaquero, Beatriz Pulgarín‐Pulgarín, Julián Rodríguez‐Almagro, Antonio Hernández‐Martínez","doi":"10.1111/nhs.13116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To understand the experience, training, and needs of midwives in their approach to perinatal grief. A descriptive cross‐sectional study was carried out using an online questionnaire with 26 questions related to institutional management and individual clinical practices in the care of a perinatal loss was developed by a team of midwives from the Hospital “La Mancha‐Centro” of Alcazar de San Juan (Ciudad Real). Strobe checklist was followed. A total of 267 midwives participated. A total of 92.1% (246) of the centers had specific protocols for action, but each professional applied their own criteria. The presence of a perinatal psychology team was nonexistent according to 88% (235) of those surveyed. Regarding their training and professional experience, 16.5% (44) of the midwives had never received training. Only 4.1% (11) of the midwives felt very prepared to care for women with a perinatal loss. Among the factors associated with greater application of recommended practices in the face of perinatal death by midwives were being a woman, having prior training on care during perinatal death, and a greater perception of preparation (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05). The perception of lack of preparation on the part of midwives in the accompaniment of these families was high.","PeriodicalId":49730,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.13116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To understand the experience, training, and needs of midwives in their approach to perinatal grief. A descriptive cross‐sectional study was carried out using an online questionnaire with 26 questions related to institutional management and individual clinical practices in the care of a perinatal loss was developed by a team of midwives from the Hospital “La Mancha‐Centro” of Alcazar de San Juan (Ciudad Real). Strobe checklist was followed. A total of 267 midwives participated. A total of 92.1% (246) of the centers had specific protocols for action, but each professional applied their own criteria. The presence of a perinatal psychology team was nonexistent according to 88% (235) of those surveyed. Regarding their training and professional experience, 16.5% (44) of the midwives had never received training. Only 4.1% (11) of the midwives felt very prepared to care for women with a perinatal loss. Among the factors associated with greater application of recommended practices in the face of perinatal death by midwives were being a woman, having prior training on care during perinatal death, and a greater perception of preparation (p < 0.05). The perception of lack of preparation on the part of midwives in the accompaniment of these families was high.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期丧子妇女的专业护理方法
了解助产士在处理围产期悲伤时的经验、培训和需求。来自阿尔卡萨德圣胡安(雷阿尔城)"拉曼恰中心 "医院的助产士团队编制了一份在线调查问卷,其中包含 26 个与围产期丧子护理的机构管理和个人临床实践相关的问题,从而开展了一项描述性横断面研究。该研究采用了 Strobe 核对表。共有 267 名助产士参与。92.1%的中心(246 个)制定了具体的行动方案,但每个专业人员都采用了自己的标准。88%(235 人)的受访者表示没有围产期心理小组。在培训和专业经验方面,16.5%(44 人)的助产士从未接受过培训。只有 4.1%(11 人)的助产士认为自己已经为照顾围产期丧子妇女做好了充分准备。助产士在面对围产期死亡时更多采用推荐做法的相关因素包括:身为女性、曾接受过围产期死亡护理培训以及认为自己准备充分(p < 0.05)。认为助产士在陪伴这些家庭时缺乏准备的比例很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NHS has a multidisciplinary focus and broad scope and a particular focus on the translation of research into clinical practice, inter-disciplinary and multidisciplinary work, primary health care, health promotion, health education, management of communicable and non-communicable diseases, implementation of technological innovations and inclusive multicultural approaches to health services and care.
期刊最新文献
Barriers and Enablers of Primary Healthcare Professionals in Health Research Engagement: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Development of a Questionnaire Assessing Nurses' Situational Awareness to Missed Care. Oral Health Care: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Exploring Health Sciences Students' Perspectives on Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study. The Effect of Nurses' Professional Values on Missed Nursing Care: The Mediating Role of Moral Sensitivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1